Archive for July 4th, 2012

Some Humor After the 4th of July

Wednesday, July 04th, 2012 | Author:

One of our faithful readers and supporter, and a pastor, sent me this.  I thought you might find it interesting.

This was my blog post yesterday:
I received the following invite on Facebook regarding a church July 4Th celebration: “Join us for an evening of celebrating our Freedom here in America with authentic Carolina BBQ, a host of Christian Bands/Live music, Games for the children, door prizes, and so much more! This is an opportunity for you to plan an enjoyable 4th of July Celebration and at the same time be a part of History in the making! The new ***************** is being built and all proceeds go to the building fund for a project that is well underway by the miraculous provision of God and His people! We invite you and your family to join us for food, fun and festivities! BBQ Pork, Hot Dogs, Baked Beans, Potato Salad, Cole Slaw, Rolls & Dessert Iced tea and lemonade.”
The invite is no doubt sincere. However, the more I thought about it, the more compelled I was to write concerning a subject that I have previously written about. The subject is food. In Leviticus 11, the Scriptures instruct us in what may and may not be eaten. Verse 7 says: “and the pig, for though it divides the hoof, thus making a split hoof, it does not chew cud, it is unclean to you.” (NASB) The pig is unclean and may not be consumed by the people of YHVH.

Is this really important? I ask, “Is being holy or set apart important?” At the conclusion of the instruction regarding permissible foods, verse 44-45 says: “For I am YHVH your Elohim. Consecrate yourselves therefore, and be holy, for I am holy. And you shall not make yourselves unclean with any of the swarming things that swarm on the earth. For I am YHVH who brought you up from the land of Egypt to be your Elohim; thus you shall be holy, for I am holy.’” It would seem clear from an honest reading of the scriptures, that what you eat can make you unclean, i.e. unholy. The Hebrew word for “unclean” in verse 7 is tame. It means either ritual or moral uncleaness. Both types of uncleanness is serious to YHVH. The Hebrew word for “holy” in verse 44 is qadhosh. It means both sacred ceremonially or morally. The idea is to be separate from the unclean. We as a community who follow YHVH and His Son Yeshua are to be separate from those who don’t follow Him. One way of separation is to make meals a sacred occasion. We eat what YHVH has said we may eat. Eating is not about my choices; eating is about following YHVH and His Son Yeshua. The community you are a member of is very important. Is your community clean or unclean?

The church invite means well. I will not be going. Candidly, I don’t think Yeshua will be going either, unless He brings His lunch.

Barry Jenkins Sr.
Category: Articles  | Tags: ,  | 128 Comments

Political Suicide

Wednesday, July 04th, 2012 | Author:

Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities.  For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God.  Romans 13:1 NASB

Governing authorities – Rabbi Shmuley Boteach has written a lot of books.  Two in particular are blockbusters:  Kosher Sex and Kosher Jesus.  I can’t say much about the first since I haven’t read it, but the second, Kosher Jesus, is a great piece of fiction.  Of course, it was meant to be a serious study, even a scholarly one.  But it contains so many mistakes in exegesis, such a lack of understanding of the New Testament text and ethos, and such a tangible polemic against Paul that it is hard to think of it in any other terms than a work of imagination.  Boteach goes to great lengths to “demonstrate” that the authors of the New Testament documents edited and altered the true story of Jesus, a Jewish political rebel.  He sets himself up as the correct interpreter of the documents, telling the reader again and again what pieces of the gospels are true and what pieces have been “heavily edited.”  Of course, how he determines the difference remains unexplained, except for the fact that the “edited” portions are the ones that don’t portray Jesus as the political rebel Boteach wants him to be.

But the most egregious reconstruction of the New Testament comes in his treatment of Paul.  Boteach is willing to accept Jesus as a misguided political zealot but still a hero of first century Judaism.  But Paul?  No, he was a traitor to Judaism, a convert to a new religion and ultimately responsible for accommodating Jesus’ teaching to Gentile ears.  Paul, according to Boteach, made Jesus palatable to Rome!

One of the arguments Boteach uses is Paul’s remark about submitting to authorities.  It doesn’t surprise me that Boteach uses this passage.  He is historically correct when he recognizes that the Christian Church has used Paul’s words to endorse submission to the most vile and corrupt leaders (including, as he notes, men like Hitler).  Boteach draws the conclusion that such advice cannot possibly be in line with the ethics of Jesus and must, therefore, have been constructed by Paul in order to make Paul’s new religion acceptable to the brutal powers of the Roman Empire.  Boteach would be correct – if his exegesis weren’t so flawed.  His history is right.  The Church did and does use this verse to assert control over its followers.  But Boteach didn’t read Nanos (and probably doesn’t even know about him).  Mark Nanos clearly shows that the letter to the Romans is not about pagan politics or governments.  Paul’s remarks must be read in the context of his audience, and that audience is the Gentile-Jewish members within the synagogue.  Nanos demonstrates that Paul is calling for submission to synagogue leaders.  These are the only ones put into position by God and they are the only ones who “will have praise” for righteous behavior.  Boteach understands correctly what the Church has taught.  He just doesn’t understand Paul (and neither does the Church).

Why should we care about a book that contains such blatant inaccuracies and deliberate misunderstandings?  We should care because a lot of people read Boteach as if he were the gospel.  This only leads to further schism.  Was Jesus Jewish?  Of course!  Was he a political zealot who mistakenly thought of himself as the Messiah?  Boteach says so, but his basis for saying this is the most tenuous re-reading of the text.  Was Paul to blame for Christian pogroms against Jews?  Boteach says “Yes.”  But Bo doesn’t know Paul.  (I wonder if he even read Paul’s work).  He certainly knows what the Church says about Paul, but he stops well short of real scholarship.  Unfortunately, his efforts only contribute to greater antagonism between Christians and Jews.  And his claim that all faiths lead ultimately to God makes me wonder if he actually represents Judaism accurately.  He does sell a lot of books.

Nevertheless, Boteach’s big mistake grants us a learning opportunity.  We must correct the exegetical nonsense about submitting to political authorities!  We must read Romans in context!  We must stop the terrible proclamation that God endorses whomever happens to be in power in the government.  God desires righteousness and when the government does not display righteousness, it is wrong, sinful and destructive!  God is not on the side of the king, the prime minister or the president (although they would like us to think so).  Boteach shows us just how ridiculous and immoral it is to offer a blanket endorsement of political entities.  It’s time to bring Paul’s context back into play.  It’s time to say “No,” to unrighteousness no matter where it is found.

We do not submit to evil authorities and Paul never suggests that we should.

Topical Index:  governing authorities, submit, Boteach, Kosher Jesus, Romans 13:1