Tag-Archive for » Genesis 1:26 «

Man As Metaphor

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 | Author: Skip Moen

And God said, “Let us make man in our image; according to our likeness.” Genesis 1:26

According To Our LikenessDe’mut is the Hebrew word translated “likeness.” It is a feminine noun. Tselem, the word for “image,” is a masculine noun. The text makes it quite clear that both words apply to the God-carrying, earth-creatures. But what’s the difference? Why not just say Man is created in God’s image and leave it at that? Why add this word?

A quick pass shows us God apparently combines masculine (image) and feminine (likeness) characteristics. Gender words don’t seem to be a problem here. Before sex is any kind of issue at all, the Hebrew text recognizes equality in its very choice of words.

Next we discover that de’mut (likeness) is often used in comparison of two dissimilar things.  Wicked people are like snake venom (Psalm 58:4).  The approaching wrath of God is like the thunder of an army on the move (Isaiah 13:4).  We see these similes but where is the comparison in the Genesis text?  What simile or metaphor is involved here?

We could suggest that the metaphor is the comparison of human beings with God.  These truly dissimilar beings are brought together by comparing something similar in each.  What is the similarity?  For that, we need a picture.

The full phrase (“according to our likeness”) is kidmoo-tenoo.  In the middle is de’mut.  This word presents the picture:  path-chaos-nail-seal (Daleth-Mem-Vav-Tau).  We suggest “the path securing a covenant over chaos.”  To be in God’s likeness is to be on the pathway that guarantees life over destruction.  God’s image is about transferred authority and order over what destroys.  God’s likeness is about the seal or guarantee that this pathway means life.  Both are active, dynamic relationships, not static elements.  Both require a prior and continuing connection to the Creator.  And both endorse life over chaos.

What happens when we add the consonant prefix and suffix?  Ki is the Hebrew word for “according to.”  But the consonant Kaf is the picture of an open hand.  It means “to allow, to open, to cover.”  Noo adds two consonants to the word, one which acts as a vowel.  They are Nun-Vav.  The picture is life secured or added.  What does the whole phrase look like?  “Allow the path that secures a covenant over chaos of guaranteed life” might be one possibility.  You might determine another, but the imagery seems obvious.  Being human means being tied to God’s path to life.  It means standing against chaos and the forces that destroy life.  It means sharing in a covenant guarantee.  It means knowing what is permitted and what is not, and acting accordingly.  Any behavior that denies, negates or rejects these images is not human behavior and the creatures who exhibit non-human behavior are not the creatures God made.  Perhaps more accurately, God intends His earth-creatures to become human.  It is a process of dynamic interaction with roles, responsibilities and a relationship with Him.  Over time, those who have been designed to become human can reject this path.  Many do.  They eventually arrive at a destination not intended for human beings.  Human beings are intended to arrive at “our image and likeness.”

It might be useful for followers of the Way to recognize just what is at stake here.  It’s not simply salvation, is it?

Topical Index: likeness, de’mut, kidmoo-tenoo, human, Genesis 1:26

Quién Da La Orden/ Quién La Recibe

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 | Author: Bessy Bendaña


Y dijo Dios: Hagamos al hombre a nuestra imagen, conforme a nuestra semejanza; Génesis 1:26

A Nuestra Imagen – ¿Qué significa el relato de Génesis cuando dice que los seres humanos fueron hechos a la imagen de Dios? La pregunta ciertamente ha permanecido al frente de innumerables tratados teológicos. A través de los siglos, la Iglesia ha entretenido grandes debates sobre qué cosa está y no está incluida en la idea que de alguna manera portamos la imagen de Dios. Sería imposible revisar todo el material sobre ésta idea, pero obviamente es crítica para nuestra comprensión de quién somos. Sabemos que la apreciación hebraica no avala la idea griega de que todo ser humano contiene un poco de chispa divina. Sabemos que la apreciación hebraica también radica lejos de la idea que los seres humanos somos meras extensiones del reino animal. Pero no hemos concretado el tema de exactamente cómo nos relacionamos a la imagen de Dios. Así que la puerta se abre para un vistazo más.

¿Qué nos dice el pictógrafo para la palabra “imagen”? la palabra hebrea es tselem. En éste texto, la palabra es be-tsalmenoo. El prefijo be es la preposición “dentro.” El sufijo noo es en pronombre “nuestro.”  La raíz consiste de tres consonantes: Tsadik-Lamed-Mem. Estas tres consonantes nos proporcionan la imagen, “el deseo o necesidad (gancho) de controlar o tener autoridad sobre el caos.” Eso parece lógico.  Si Génesis es alguna cosa, es la proclamación de la autoridad de Dios sobre el caos. Génesis anuncia el Dios de orden, el Dios que provee organización y propósito a las profundidades y quién conquista lo desordenado y vacio (Génesis 1:2). Si los seres humanos tenemos esto en común con el Creador, también están diseñados para proveer orden al caos y ejercer autoridad sobre las estructuras. Representamos el carácter divino cuando provocamos que viva el orden bajo el estandarte de la actividad creativa de Dios. Nuestra autoridad es derivativa. Depende en la autoridad soberana de Dios. Pero aun sigue siendo autoridad. Siempre y cuando actuemos como Sus agentes, exhibimos Su imagen.

¿Comprendiste eso? La imagen de Dios no es un elemento estático en el ser humano. Es la actividad dinámica del ser humano. Porto la imagen de Dios como el hacedor de orden cuando actúo como el tomador de orden. Lo que constituye la imagen es la acción dentro de la relación.  Con esto en mente podemos comprender el comentario de Pablo en Romanos 1 y la traducción de Onkelos de Génesis 1. La imagen de Dios es un verbo, igual que Dios es un verbo.

Esta investigación contiene más de un nivel. “En Nuestra imagen” no es tselem. Es be-tsalmenoo. La raíz no cambia, pero cambia la estructura de la palabra. Cuando agregamos Bet y Nun, la imagen se expande. Ahora “desear control sobre el caos” se convierte en “la casa del deseo de controlar el caos en la vida.” En otras palabras, ser en la imagen de Dios está limitado a los límites establecidos por el Creador. Portamos Su imagen – el ejercicio dinámico de autoridad – dentro de la casa de vida que El provee.

Esto nos deja con una sola pregunta: ¿Quién somos cuando no ejercemos nuestra autoridad dentro de la casa de vida de Dios? Por lo menos esto queda claro. Lo que seamos, no somos portadores de la imagen de Dios. Su imagen fluye dentro de los límites. Nuestras acciones fuera de esos límites nos hacen algo que no es humano. Los humanos son los que ministran dentro de la casa.

Imagen, tselem, be-tsalmenoo, limites, Génesis 1:26

Order-Taker/Order-Maker

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 | Author: Skip Moen

And God said, “Let us make man in our image; according to our likeness.” Genesis 1:26

In Our Image – What does the Genesis account mean when it says that human beings are made in the image of God? That question has certainly been at the forefront of countless theological treatises. Over the centuries, the Church has entertained great debates about just what is and what is not included in the idea that we somehow carry God’s image. It would be impossible to review all the material about this idea, but it is obviously critical to our understanding of who we are. We know that the Hebraic view does not endorse the Greek idea that every human being has a bit of the divine spark within. We know that the Hebraic view is also a long ways away from the idea that human beings are merely extensions of the animal kingdom. But we haven’t settled the issue about exactly how we are related to God’s image. So, the door is open for one more look.

What does the pictograph of the word for “image” tell us? The Hebrew word is tselem. In this text, the word is be-tsalmenoo. The prefix be is the preposition “in.” The suffix noo is the pronoun “our.” The root consists of three consonants: Tsadik-Lamed-Mem. These three consonants give us the picture, “the desire or need (hook) to control or have authority over chaos.” That makes a lot of sense. If Genesis is anything, it is the proclamation of God’s authority over chaos. Genesis announces the God of order, the God who brings organization and purpose to the deep and who conquers the formless and void (Genesis 1:2). If human beings have this much in common with the Creator, they too are designed to bring order to chaos and exercise authority over structure. We represent the divine character when we bring order to life under the banner of God’s creative activity. Our authority is derivative. It depends on God’s sovereign authority. But it is authority nonetheless. As long as we are acting as His agents, we exhibit His image.

Ah, did you get that? The image of God is not a static element in human being. It is a dynamic activity of being human. I carry God’s image as the order-maker when I act as the order-taker. It is the action within the relationship that constitutes the image. With this in mind, we can understand Paul’s commentary in Romans 1 and Onkelos translation of Genesis 1. The image of God is a verb, just like God is a verb.

There is one more level in this investigation. “In Our image” is not tselem. It is be-tsalmenoo. The root doesn’t change, but the structure of the word does. When we add Bet and Nun, the picture enlarges. Now “desiring control over chaos” becomes “the house of desiring control over chaos in life.” In other words, being in God’s image is limited to the boundaries set by the Creator. We carry His image – the dynamic exercise of authority – within the house of life that He provides.

This leaves us with only one question: Who are we when we do not exercise our authority within God’s house of life? At least this much seems clear. Whatever we are, we are not carriers of God’s image. His image flows within the boundaries. Our actions outside those boundaries make us something other than human. Human beings are those who minister in the house.

Topical Index: image, tselem, be-tsalmenoo, boundaries, Genesis 1:26