What is man that You take thought of him, and the son of man that You care for him? Psalm 8:4
What – The Hebrew word mah is an indefinite interrogative pronoun that means “what?” But “what” isn’t right in this verse. The Hebrew translation is correct, but the cultural transposition isn’t. “What is man?” is the wrong question. You see, asking what man is can be answered by a list of reductions common to our way of thinking. Man is an upright, walking animal that is self-aware. Really? Man is a biological machine that processes food into thought. Really? Man is the end of the evolutionary chain. Really? You see, when I ask “what,” I miss the point of David’s question. David isn’t asking for a biology lesson or a social-political theory. He is asking who we are from God’s perspective. How is it possible that the God of all creation pays any attention to us? Who are we that this God should even notice? The difference between our understanding of “what” and David’s understanding of mah is enormous – and critically important.
Abraham Heschel says, “It is indeed conceivable that man may continue to be without being human. . . . One of the most frightening prospects we must face is that this earth may be populated by a race of beings which though belonging to the race Homo sapiens according to biology will be devoid of the qualities by which man is spiritually distinguished from the rest of organic creatures.”[1]
You may want to read that again. Three thousand years ago, David recognized that the truth about who I am is defined by my relationship to the Creator. It is not a matter of biology or politics or mechanics or any other factor. I am human because I am related to God and only in my relation to God can I become human. Soren Kierkegaard said it well: “Now with the help of God I can become myself.”
Being human means being tied to God’s path to life. It means standing against chaos and the forces that destroy life. It means sharing in a covenant guarantee. It means knowing what is permitted and what is not, and acting accordingly. Any behavior that denies, negates or rejects these images is not human behavior and the creatures who exhibit non-human behavior are not creatures that exhibit God’s image. Before sin entered the world, God made human beings as perfect representatives of His image and likeness. Now we discover that this is an active and dynamic condition. In the perfect creation, nothing prevented male and female from taking on the image and likeness of God. They are human because they act humanly. In the process, they continue to become human. But when sin entered the picture, something tragic occurred. Now it became possible to move in another direction. Over time, those who have been designed to become human can reject walking this path. Many do. They eventually arrive at a destination not intended for human beings. Human beings are intended to arrive at the full expression of “our image and likeness.” But it is also possible to arrive at another destination.[2]
The image of God is not a static element in being human. It is not something that we possess like flesh and blood. It is a dynamic activity. I carry God’s image as the order-maker when I act as the order-taker. It is action within the relationship that constitutes the image. This is exactly what we expect from a Hebrew perspective. We are human because of and through our actions. We are manifest as human beings when we act humanly, when we act in ways that manifest the image and likeness of God. Just like God is a verb, the image of God is a verb. We truly are “works in progress,” and the reason we are works at all is because God notices us.
Topical Index: what, mah, image of God, human, Psalm 8:4
[1] Abraham Heschel, Who Is Man? (Stanford University Press, 1965) p. 29.
[2] From The Perfect Enemy (forthcoming)

Recent Comments