Tag-Archive for » kosher «

Some Humor After the 4th of July

Wednesday, July 04th, 2012 | Author:

One of our faithful readers and supporter, and a pastor, sent me this.  I thought you might find it interesting.

This was my blog post yesterday:
I received the following invite on Facebook regarding a church July 4Th celebration: “Join us for an evening of celebrating our Freedom here in America with authentic Carolina BBQ, a host of Christian Bands/Live music, Games for the children, door prizes, and so much more! This is an opportunity for you to plan an enjoyable 4th of July Celebration and at the same time be a part of History in the making! The new ***************** is being built and all proceeds go to the building fund for a project that is well underway by the miraculous provision of God and His people! We invite you and your family to join us for food, fun and festivities! BBQ Pork, Hot Dogs, Baked Beans, Potato Salad, Cole Slaw, Rolls & Dessert Iced tea and lemonade.”
The invite is no doubt sincere. However, the more I thought about it, the more compelled I was to write concerning a subject that I have previously written about. The subject is food. In Leviticus 11, the Scriptures instruct us in what may and may not be eaten. Verse 7 says: “and the pig, for though it divides the hoof, thus making a split hoof, it does not chew cud, it is unclean to you.” (NASB) The pig is unclean and may not be consumed by the people of YHVH.

Is this really important? I ask, “Is being holy or set apart important?” At the conclusion of the instruction regarding permissible foods, verse 44-45 says: “For I am YHVH your Elohim. Consecrate yourselves therefore, and be holy, for I am holy. And you shall not make yourselves unclean with any of the swarming things that swarm on the earth. For I am YHVH who brought you up from the land of Egypt to be your Elohim; thus you shall be holy, for I am holy.’” It would seem clear from an honest reading of the scriptures, that what you eat can make you unclean, i.e. unholy. The Hebrew word for “unclean” in verse 7 is tame. It means either ritual or moral uncleaness. Both types of uncleanness is serious to YHVH. The Hebrew word for “holy” in verse 44 is qadhosh. It means both sacred ceremonially or morally. The idea is to be separate from the unclean. We as a community who follow YHVH and His Son Yeshua are to be separate from those who don’t follow Him. One way of separation is to make meals a sacred occasion. We eat what YHVH has said we may eat. Eating is not about my choices; eating is about following YHVH and His Son Yeshua. The community you are a member of is very important. Is your community clean or unclean?

The church invite means well. I will not be going. Candidly, I don’t think Yeshua will be going either, unless He brings His lunch.

Barry Jenkins Sr.
Category: Articles  | Tags: ,  | 128 Comments

Who Says?

Friday, May 11th, 2012 | Author:

“because it does not go into his heart, but into his stomach, and is eliminated?” (Thus He declared all foods clean.) Mark 7:19 NASB

Clean – What a mess this verse has created!  Why it became a mess is a study in the program of self-identity that the Church undertook in the third century.  Suffice it to say that the early fathers of the Church made deliberate attempts to remove themselves from Jewish origins, and dietary laws were front and center in that battle.  But third century exegesis does not make good first century commentary.  There is more here than meets the eye, especially if you are wearing “Christian-dogma” colored glasses.

In the past we have noted Tim Hegg’s excellent article on the problems with the Greek text, and the misinterpretation of this text based on the addition of “Thus He declared.”  No such subject occurs in the Greek, making the dangling participle (cleansed) awkward.  Hegg points out that a perfectly legitimate translation of the text would focus on the bodily cleansing process of elimination, contrasting this process with the defilement of the heart which is not cleansed through normal elimination.

But Daniel Boyarin provides an even clearer solution to this difficult passage by treating it for what it is in context.  Yeshua is engaged in an intramural debate with other Pharisees over the precise requirements of the purification of food.  Boyarin points out that in the first century some Pharisees advocated strict observance of the oral Torah which added stipulations about handling kosher food so that it might not be contaminated by contact with unclean substances.  As Boyarin notes, the debate is not about the necessity of kashrut (kosher eating).  Boyarin observes that the dialog never challenges the need for dietary laws.  The dialogue challenges the Pharisee’s added requirements about handling food (and in Torah, anything not kosher is not food).  Boyarin indicates that “the system of purity and impurity laws and the system of dietary laws are two different systems within the Torah’s rules for eating.”[1]  Yeshua is addressing the former, not the latter.  Yeshua simply says that the Pharisees additional requirements concerning hand washing are unnecessary since no impurity is attached to what God has already designated as “food” simply because a man doesn’t wash his hands before touching it.  Such supposed impurity cannot defile a man because it passes through him.  Yeshua recalls the emphasis of the written Torah, noting that only what comes out of a man can defile him.  And Torah is quite specific on what those things are (menstrual blood and semen).  These things, and only these things, that come out of the body can render someone impure.  Food cannot do so.  Thus, concludes Yeshua, the additional requirement of hand-washing is not only superfluous, it is not found in Torah.

Then Yeshua makes an object lesson of this event.  He explains to his disciples that the added requirements of the Pharisees have missed the point.  What matters when it comes to purity is the condition of the heart.  This is not a statement about kashrutKosher still applies.  No one in the circle of this conversation ever doubted that.  When Mark adds the editorial, “Cleansing all foods,” he was not abrogating kashrut.  He was explaining that food touched by impure substances does not render the consumer impure.  Any food (and that means kosher) is already cleansed because God has already designated it food.

Boyarin puts to rest the tortured exegesis of Christian apologists who wish to claim Yeshua abolished kashrut.  Everyone present on that day was Jewish.  Everyone was Torah observant when it came to kashrut.  Yeshua never suggested otherwise.  He simply took issue with the Pharisaical practice of hand-washing as a useless addition.  If Boyarin, a Jewish scholar, can see that this is the heart of Yeshua’s comment, then why do Christian theologians insist on adding “Thus He declared,” as Origen did in the 2nd century?  Could it be that they want to be rid of kashrut even if Yeshua doesn’t say so?

Topical Index:  clean, kashrut,  kosher, Mark 7:19, Boyarin



[1] Daniel Boyarin, The Jewish Gospels, p. 113.

Category: Today's Word  | Tags: , , , ,  | One Comment