Tag-Archive for » Romans 8:7 «

Implications, Implications

Friday, April 16th, 2010 | Author: Skip Moen

because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the Law of God, for it is not even able to do so; Romans 8:7

Does Not Subject Itself – The expression is strong in Greek: ouk hupotassetai.  The negative (ouk) is the unconditional kind.  It is never the case.  The verb for submission (hupotasso) means “to place in proper order.”  The person who is hostile toward God always refuses to put God in the proper place.  Such a person will not acknowledge God’s rightful sovereignty.  Such a person does not recognize (because they choose not to recognize) the duty we have to serve the Creator.  In other words, their answer to life’s most important question, “What does God demand of me?” is “I choose to do what I wish.  As far as I am concerned, God has no demand on me!”  Such a person foolishly believes in the right of self-determination.

We recognize the foolishness in this direction, but we might not have noticed the implication behind Paul’s claim.  The Torah is not set aside because this man rejects it.  In fact, his guilt is established precisely because He does reject God’s instructions.  We can see the great implication in this verse by writing its opposite.  “. . . because the mind set on the Spirit is at peace with God; for it does subject itself to the Law of God because the Spirit enables it to do so.”  The opposite of the man hostile to God is not the man free from the Law.  The opposite of the hostile man is the man who submits to the Torah, who subjects himself to it.  This is the man at peace with God!

Paul’s statement endorses obedience to the Torah.  Men are found guilty when they refuse to obey it and found at peace when they do.  The wicked reject God’s Torah.  The righteous embrace God’s Torah.  That’s about the summary of life under God’s banner.  How Christianity came to believe that the righteous are released from Torah is a long story of politics, philosophy, persecution and bias.  But that story is nearly as important as seeing the implication in Paul’s statement.  Torah is our guide for peace with God.  It does not produce righteousness nor is it the basis of our redemption.  But it is vital for our usefulness to God, for our witness to the world and for harmony among men.  Without it, we are no better off than the redeemed man who is left to himself to determine his way in the world.

Reading Paul often requires a new set of glasses; a set of glasses that fit the face of a rabbinic Pharisee who found the Messiah.  The worldview seen through those lenses is very different than the worldview we normally associate with Christianity.  It takes some time to get used to these new views.  But it is so important.  After all, we aren’t in this game to prove our theology.  We are here to do His bidding, to follow His directions and to see His will become reality on earth as it is in heaven.

Topical Index:  Torah, law, hupotasso, submit, Romans 8:7

Category: Today's Word  | Tags: , , , ,  | 9 Comments

Carnal?

Friday, August 07th, 2009 | Author: Skip Moen

because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is not even able {to do so,} Romans 8:7

The Mind Set On The Flesh – How are you doing in your fight for sinless perfection? Are you winning the battle every day or have you suffered defeats? Are you a sanctified soul or a carnal Christian?

Do these questions bother you?  They should.

Somewhere along the way, Christianity embraced the Greek metaphysics of the body/mind/soul split. When this alien concept crept into Christian thinking, it eventually led to the postulation of a carnal Christian, the believer who has confessed Christ as Savior but does not live with Christ as Lord. This is the person whose life is characterized by actions that do not glorify God but at the same time claims God’s forgiveness and acceptance. The “carnal” Christian has a body under sin’s control but a soul that belongs to God. What? Does that mean God saves only part of this person? Does that mean that what happens in my body doesn’t really matter as long as my soul is saved? A careful reading of the Bible endorses none of this Greek nonsense, but it certainly is a popular way of explaining behavior. Perhaps we need to take another look at Paul’s famous comments about “carnal” Christians (the King James translation of this phrase).

The critical Greek word is phronema. This word covers the entire translated phrase, “the mind set on”. Phronema means “what one has in mind, purposes or thoughts.” In this case, Paul says the purpose or thoughts of this mental condition is sarx, the flesh. This should remind us of the passage in Genesis 6:5, “the intent of the thoughts of the heart.” But notice that the Hebrew equivalent does not suggest a split spiritual state where men confess God but act disobediently. In the Genesis equivalent, the thoughts of their minds were given over to evil and, as a result, God brought judgment upon the earth. These were a long way from the “carnal” Christian bifurcation we find today. In Genesis, intent and purpose in thoughts leads directly to judgment, not excuse. In the ancient world, if your mind was filled with purposes of the flesh, you were not standing in God’s grace. You were not redeemed. You died in the flood along with all the other evil people in the world because the mind whose purposes and intents are determined by sarx is the enemy of God. In Hebrew thought, this is yester ha’ra run amuck.

Paul is a Jewish Messianic rabbi. Do you suppose that he entertained the Greek tripartate division of human beings (body, mind and soul)? Not likely. Paul’s anthropology was homogenized; the neshama or nefesh was one person all mixed up together embodied in this world. God doesn’t save the soul and leave the body to rot. That’s Greek, not Hebrew. So, if Paul would never have accepted the division of human being into parts, then how could he possibly suggest that spiritual existence could be divided between the carnal and the spiritual? If the purposes and intents of my mind (read neshama or nefesh) are filled with hostility toward God, doesn’t that force us to conclude that such a person is not redeemed? After all, this person is an enemy, not a humble seeker. This person is dominated by the yester ha’ra, not struggling against the evil inclination in order to be obedient to the Lord.

Does that mean that Christians are only those who no longer experience the fight for personal holiness? Of course not. That fight goes on for a long, long time. But the person who isn’t fighting probably isn’t domesticated to God. I am either motivated to obey and struggling to do so, or I am capitulating to the evil inclination and comfortable with the result. I am either fighting for God or fighting against Him. There are no fence-sitters in this war.

Topical Index: yester ha’ra, sarx, phronema, mind, body, soul, Genesis 6:5, Romans 8:7, carnal