Tag-Archive for » teach «

Degree Mill

Monday, April 01st, 2013 | Author:

“But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I said to you.”  John 14:26  NASB

Teach – In academic circles, a “degree mill” is a company that offers you pieces of paper that claim you have a university degree, from a B.A. to a Ph.D.  For a price, these pseudo-institutions send you credentials without requiring any of the hard work of accredited centers of learning.  You just pay your money and hang the bogus degree on your wall.  While I do not believe that all real education must come through accredited institutions, I certainly know what it takes to produce true scholarship.  It takes real work.  Real time commitment.  Real struggle.  Real study.

Except, of course, if you are guided by the Holy Spirit.

Today I received an email in response to my correspondence with a reader who suggested that the Song of Solomon was an allegory about the Church and Christ.  This is a very old Christian interpretation that conveniently ignores the erotic elements of the ancient poetry.  It is also an interpretation that requires the reader to suppose that no one who read the poem prior to the death of Yeshua really understood it.  The one who proposed this allegorical interpretation claimed that “God showed me to interprete [sic] the Bible several ways:  1) literally at face value, 2) as compared to other scriptures 3) as an allegory when apropriate [sic], as Jesus and the writers sometimes did, 4) as the Holy Spirit would interprete [sic] it, sometimes that is literally, allegorically, however He would choose.  I try not to limit the Holy Spirit.”  In other words, since the Holy Spirit tuaght this reader that Song of Solomon is an allegory, we don’t need to investigate any further.  We can by-pass all the contextual, linguistic, cultural and historical research and simply meditate and pray.  The Holy Spirit becomes a private, personal instructor.  And, presto-chango, I receive my official interpreter’s degree from the Holy Spirit degree mill (best of all, I don’t have to pay for it because Jesus already did).

Let’s see how this works out historically.  Based on the idea that men can receive private instruction from the Holy Spirit, we must conclude that The Holy Spirit guided the early Church fathers to reject Messianic Judaism.  The Holy Spirit inspired Augustine and Aquinas to propose the philosophical God of the via negativa.  The Holy Spirit led the Church to persecute the Jews for 1500 years.  The Holy Spirit enabled Martin Luther to see that Jews needed to be exterminated.  The Holy Spirit taught ante-bellum theologians that Negroid people were cursed by God.  The Holy Spirit instructed the Catholic popes to change the day of Sabbath.  The Holy Spirit guided David Koresh to establish the Branch Davidian ministry.  The Holy Spirit leads some current television preachers to teach that God wants to make you rich (if you just send your tithe to me).  You get the idea.  My reader might object to all of these as “not really being from the Holy Spirit.”  But I would ask, “How do you know?”  What is the difference between your claim for private instruction and any of these other claims?  What grounds do you offer for me to trust your Holy Spirit insight?  And as soon as you offer reasons, then I would point out that you are no longer relying on the Holy Spirit as the basis of your claim.

The Greek word didasko in its widest sense means to impart instruction and practical knowledge.  Its Hebrew parallel is lamad.  From an Hebraic perspective, the object of such teaching is to do the will of God.  By the first century, this Hebrew word most often meant instruction in the Torah for the purpose of living according to the commandments.  This implies context, not private spiritual inspiration.  Instruction in godly living is a public, communal  process.  Even Yeshua’s statement is addressed to the disciples (plural), not to individuals.  In the Hebraic community, learning and teaching demand correspondence with Torah and plenty of debate and discussion.  Yeshua would never have suggested that the Holy Spirit is the personal and private revealer of uncontestable truth.  It takes a Greek orientation and a lazy mind to pretend that all I have to do is let the Holy Spirit inform me.

But it’s oh-so-tempting to choose this Holy Spirit escape path.  Then I don’t have to really study.  Then I can claim “divine” authority for my interpretation.  Then I will always be right.

But no one should listen to you.

Wherever I travel, I encounter this penchant for lazy exegesis.  The alternative often seems overwhelming.  Language study, history, culture, theology – all that stuff takes time and effort.  “Why can’t God just reveal it to me?” is the easy way out.  God could, of course, but then you would have to defend your views in the public arena and that would put you right back to square one.  Learning (lamad) is hard work.  It requires many opinions and considerable debate.  Avoid the “Holy Spirit told me” claims like the plague.  They are probably closer to Pharaoh than to Yeshua.

Topical Index:  teach, didasko, lamad, Holy Spirit, John 14:26

A Word from the Lord

Tuesday, June 26th, 2012 | Author:

And as for you, the anointing which you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need for any one to teach you; but as His anointing teaches you about all things, and is true and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you abide in Him.  1 John 2:27  NASB

Have no need – Let’s just read this verse without its context, culture or theological history.  Why not?  Many do.  Doesn’t it clearly say that you don’t have to study or debate or concern yourself with all the scholarship?  All you need is the “anointing.”  In fact, doesn’t John guarantee that you already have this anointing, and therefore you “have no need” for any teachers?  You’re saved.  You have the Holy Spirit (is He a “possession” of yours?).  What more do you need?  Apparently, nothing!

Did John really endorse what I call the “Holy Spirit epistemology” in this verse?  Did John really mean that no further instruction is necessary?  Just pray and wait for illumination, right?  Perhaps we need to back up a few verses and look at John’s opening statements.  What we find changes the meaning of this very convenient verse.

Let’s start with verse 24.  It’s obviously connected since John is introducing the topic of abiding.  In verse 24 he writes that we abide because we continue to exercise a faith based on what we heard from the beginning.  In fact, John implores us to let the original message have its full impact in our lives.  Of course, John uses Greek terms to express Hebrew ideas.  So when he says “heard,” you can be sure that he doesn’t mean “just listen.”  To hear is to obey.  So abiding is not merely acknowledging or taking notes or storing information away for a rainy day.  It is doing what you have heard.

Clearly this is an allusion to the path of the Tanakh.  In fact, when we realize that John had no other Bible than the Tanakh, when we put aside all of the New Testament documents, then we are left with the obvious conclusion that what his readers heard “from the beginning” could only be the teaching of Moses, as James clearly states in Acts  15:21.  Put the verse in its context.  The reason John’s readers can abide without teaching is simply because they have God’s instructions in hand.  They have the Tanakh and the community.  Furthermore, John’s statement echoes the proclamation of Yeshua in the gospel (John 14:26), “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my Name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I said to you.”  If the Spirit is sent from the Father, can we imagine that He would not carry the Father’s message?  If He comes in order to bring the teaching of Yeshua to mind, can we imagine that Yeshua’s views of the Tanakh’s instructions would somehow be altered by the Spirit?  Of course not.  The Father, the Son and the Spirit teach the same thing.  John insists that any teacher who does not convey this consistent message is a false teacher (see verse 23).  His readers have no need of anyone who contradicts the same message preached from the beginning.

The context suggests that John is referring to those who are teaching contrary to what his readers already know to be true.  His readers have no need of any of these kind of teachers.  They have the Spirit, and the promise of the Messiah, to countermand anything such false teachers would say.  The Greek indefinite pronoun, tis, can also be translated “someone,” as in “you have no need of someone to teach.”  But this is not the same as saying that they have no need of any instruction at all.  John’s polemic against those who claim to be teaching the truth, but who in fact are denying the message of Yeshua, does not eliminate all teaching, as the translation “someone” demonstrates.  “Holy Spirit epistemology” that denies the need for instruction is fallacious, especially if it stands in contradiction to “what you heard from the beginning.”

I might suggest that the NASB choice of “any one” rather than “someone” pushes the reader toward the belief that study and consultation is unnecessary.  I hope that this wasn’t the reason for choosing “any one.”  But our contemporary penchant for spiritual individualism and our tendency to ignore history feeds this idea, to our detriment.  John would never have suggested that study was unnecessary.  Neither would he suggest that a believer can be all that God intended if he is separated from biblical tradition and community.  We must shift the paradigm if we are to read the text in its context.  And shift we must!  Otherwise, we can all retire to the armchair and hope that God speaks personally to each of us.

Topical Index:  Holy Spirit, epistemology, instruction, teach, 1 John 2:27

 

Idolatry by Osmosis

Tuesday, August 16th, 2011 | Author:

but they mingled with the nations and learned their practices, Psalm 106:35  NASB

Learned – David described Israel in the 10th Century BC.  He might as well have penned this line 3000 years later.  Haven’t we mingled with the nations and learned their practices?  Aren’t we in the same place as Israel before Babylon?

What have we learned in 3000 years?  The Hebrew verb is lamad.  It means “to study, to teach, to learn, to be taught, to be learned.”  God sternly warned His people not to learn, teach, study or practice the corrupt, pagan ways of the nations.  Instead, God’s followers were to learn His ways.  Then He told them exactly what those ways were.  Let’s take a look at some of them to see if we have mingled.  Here’s a quick checklist:

“Do not entertain the idea that there is any god but YHWH” (Exodus 20:3).  How is our culture doing with that one?  How are your children doing with this in our government schools and universities?  How much mingling did it take to produce a generation that believes all spiritual paths lead to God?

“Learn Torah and teach it” (Deuteronomy 6:7).  How is the Church doing with this?  Who did the mingling here?  When did God change His mind about this?

“Do not take away from the commandments of Torah” (Deuteronomy 13:1).  Hmm?  Our religious culture certainly followed this to the letter, didn’t it?

“Recite grace after meals” (Deuteronomy 8:10).  What is the usual procedure in your house?

“Do not bear a grudge or take revenge or cherish hatred” (Leviticus 19:17-18).  How’s that working in your life?

“Rebuke a sinner” (Leviticus 19:17).  Are we ready to do this or are we hamstrung by the mingling of social and political correctness?

“Give charity according to one’s means” (Deuteronomy 15:11).  Of course, now the government takes care of this, right?  “I gave at the office.”

“Do not wrong a stranger in speech”  (Exodus 22:20).  But politicians are exempt, right?

“Do not withhold food, clothing or marriage rights from a woman” (Exodus 21:10).  How does that align with an environment of spousal abuse or with the practices of cultures?

“Do not castrate the male of any species; neither man nor beast”  (Leviticus 22:24).  I wonder if horse owners, pet breeders and the SPCA ever read this one?

“Celebrate the festivals” (Exodus 23:14).  By the way, that does not include Christmas or Easter.

“Rest on Yom Kippur” (Leviticus 23:35).  But since we don’t even celebrate Yom Kippur, especially after Jesus made it “irrelevant,” why worry about this one?

“Do not eat the flesh of unclean animals” (Leviticus 11:4)  Take a long look at the menus of your favorite restaurants.  Business in the mingled world is booming.

“Do not make a loan with interest to one of the house of Israel” (Leviticus 25:37).  As the gentleman said to me, “You must be kidding.  How can I do business if I don’t charge interest?”

“Do not delay payment of a hired man’s wages” (Leviticus 19:13).  Except, of course, when the government or the employer needs the money more.

“Do not appoint as a judge anyone who is not well-versed in Torah” (Deuteronomy 1:17).  But apparently it’s OK to elect them.

We could go on, but I don’t think it’s necessary.  There is absolutely no question that the culture and the Church are very well-mingled today.  Shaken, not stirred.  Maybe that’s why Peter Leithart calls Christianity “institutionalized worldliness.”  The only real question is this:  What about you?  How much mixing is going on it your life?

Topical Index:  lamad, learn, teach, practice, Torah, mingle, Psalm 106:35

Grammar Lesson

Thursday, December 10th, 2009 | Author:

You shall teach them diligently to your sons and shall talk of them when you sit in your house and when you walk by the way and when you lie down and when you rise up. Deuteronomy 6:7

Teach – God commands parents to teach His instructions to their children.  Let’s say that again.  God commands parents to teach specific instructions to children.  Those instructions are found in Torah.  In fact, this verse comes immediately after the Shema, a call to remember who God is and why Israel is chosen.  God does not say, “Send your children off to school to learn about life.”  He doesn’t say, “Just live correctly and let them watch you.”  He doesn’t say, “Give them a Bible, take them to church, send them to youth group.”  He says, “You teach them.”  Parents are responsible before God for what their children learn.  Oh, and did you notice that the teaching happens all the time?

Actually, the word here is only metaphorically about teaching.  In fact, in the Scripture, this is the only place that the word is translated “teach.”  All the rest of the occurrences of this word are about something entirely different (but intimately related).  The Hebrew verb shinan means “to sharpen.”  God is literally telling parents to sharpen their children with the whetstone of His Word.

The pictograph makes it even clearer.  Shin-nun-nun paints the picture of teeth (shin) and life (nun).  But notice that nun is repeated.  Teeth of life twice.  It’s not just biting into life.  It’s biting into life twice.  And for that you need very sharp teeth.  You need to “teach” your children how to consume life twice over.  You need to polish them to a point so that they can penetrate truth and falsehood and live accordingly.  How do you do that?  By talking about God’s words when you sit, when you stand, when you walk, when you lie down and when you get up.

This is a terrifying commandment for most parents today.  Why?  Because most of us have not done what God told us to do.  We did not make it a daily, hourly practice to speak of His words with our children.  We opted for substitute education.  We let the professionals handle the job.  School, preachers, Sunday school teachers, television, cultural influences and the plethora of media manipulations presented a 24/7 deluge of misdirection and misinformation.  Oh, I don’t mean that getting an education isn’t important.  Of course it is.  But God is not telling you how to teach mathematics or economics or psychology.  He’s telling you how to teach His instructions for living.  Today’s culture teaches children how to use the world for gain.  God wants you to teach your children about Him, His character, His community and His perspective.  Unless they learn this, their teeth will be dull indeed.  They will not be able to bite through the false premises of the culture.  They will be the ones eaten instead of being the ones who do the feasting.

Perhaps you need to repent because you have not fulfilled this commandment.  Perhaps you recognize the impact your disobedience has had on your children (the third and fourth generations).  Perhaps you haven’t been the sharpening stone you needed to be.  It’s never too late. God honors confession, repentance and obedience.  It’s just much harder to recover character than it is to keep it.

Topical Index:  teach, sharpen, shinan, Deuteronomy 6:7, education

Archery

Saturday, October 17th, 2009 | Author:

Teach me Your way, O YHWH, and lead me in a smooth path, because of my enemies. Psalm 27:11

Teach – Did you ever take a class in archery at summer camp? It isn’t as easy as it looks, is it? You have to learn about holding the bow and the arrow correctly. If you don’t have the right grip, when you let the arrow fly you might end up with an injured finger and a missed target. If you’re going to hit the bull’s eye, you’ll need some instruction. “Teach me,” says David. The Hebrew verb he uses is yara, a verb about shooting arrows. But David isn’t asking for archery lessons, so why does he choose this verb?

Yara has two verb constructions in the Tanakh. The first is called the qal structure. It is close to our idea of present tense active. In this form, the verb means “to cast, to throw, to shoot.” It’s used for casting lots, throwing stones and shooting arrows. The emphasis of the verb is on the control of the action. But yara is also found in the hiphil, a form that changes the present to the causative sense. Now it means something like “to cause to shoot or to cause to throw.” Since it is still about the control of the action, the hiphil of yara takes on the sense of teaching. That’s the way David uses it here. Lord, cause me to learn Your way. For a man who knew a lot about weapons, yara is the perfect verb. Take my skill with the instruments of death and convert it into instruments of life. Let me shoot straight according to Your intention. This concept of hitting the target is also found in the Hebrew idea of sin because sin is literally missing the mark.

But this isn’t quite the end of the story. You see, yara is the verbal root of another Hebrew word, torah. You can be sure that David was well aware of this connection. When he asked the Lord to teach (yara) him, he is at the same time expressing his desire to know torah, God’s “teachings.” David isn’t asking God for a personal revelation or a mystical insight into heaven. He is asking God to illuminate Torah so that he might know the smooth path of living in harmony with the Lord. David isn’t demanding a special “word from the Lord.” He is acknowledging his need to understand God’s already-revealed instructions.

The Scriptures tell us that David was a man after God’s own heart. In spite of David’s sins, God considered David a friend. In fact, David’s relationship with the Lord was so firm that God deferred punishment on many generations after David for the sake of David’s faithfulness. Clearly, David’s appeal to be taught the way of YHWH had significant results.

Isn’t that what we want? Don’t we want to aim right at the center? Then join David. Let the Lord teach you His torah. Practice doing what He says and your aim will get better and better. One day you’ll shout, “Bull’s eye!” with a big smile on your face.

Topical Index: Topical Index: yara, torah, shoot, teach, Psalm 27:11

Context, Context, Context

Saturday, March 21st, 2009 | Author:

Let a woman learn in silence, in all subjection.  But I do not allow a woman to teach, nor to exercise authority over a man, but to be in silence.  1 Timothy 2:11-12

A Woman – The universal law of real estate is simple:  location, location, location.  There is a comparable universal law in biblical exegesis:  context, context, context.  Lift a verse from its context and you can make it say anything you want.  It’s the equivalent of buying land without seeing it.

So, when we approach the second of Paul’s most controversial verses, we need to fill in a lot of context before we start making universal pronouncements.  The context is what is happening to Timothy in Ephesus.  This is a personal letter of advice and counsel.  It addresses issues in Timothy’s ministry.  It is not like the general letters Paul wrote to churches.  In this letter, Paul tries to help Timothy deal with disruptions to his work.  This means that if we are going to understand what Paul says and why he says it, we must first understand what is happening in Timothy’s life.  From everything that we can gather (since we only have half of the conversation), we discover that Timothy was dealing with several heretical teachings that were cropping up in his congregation.

First, Paul tells Timothy to combat those who propose “endless genealogies and myths” as a way of spiritual enlightenment.  He instructs Timothy to stick with the pure gospel.  We should notice that in this emphasis Paul states, “The Law is good.”  Stick with the basics.  Remain faithful to God’s revealed instructions.  Don’t get carried away in speculations.  Remember the teaching of Torah.

Next, Paul recounts his own woeful past, emphasizing that the gospel of grace which saved him is completely adequate as a means of salvation for all who adopt it.  The Messiah Yeshua brings grace beyond measure, just as God’s Word proclaims.  The mark of a believer is faith and good conscience.  Those who depart from this foundation are shipwrecked.  Paul has addressed the theological heresies.  He points to grace, the Word and the heart.  Without these, nothing else matters.

Now Paul turns his attention to practical matters.  The first is prayer.  Pray for everyone, he says to Timothy.  Why?  Because God desires all to be redeemed through the one and only mediator, Yeshua.  How is this to be done?  In proper order, with circumspect behavior, showing honor to God.  This becomes the basis for Paul’s commentary on activities in the church.  He exhorts men to pray earnestly everywhere they have opportunity.  He exhorts women to do the same, dressed in appropriate attire.  What does he mean?  He means that neither men nor women should call attention to themselves but rather act and dress in such a way that honor God.  Notice the word, “likewise” in verse 9.  Paul wants men to pray without anger or doubt.  Then he says he wants women to do “likewise.”  The Greek word means “in the same manner.”  What does this mean?  The only similarity here is the demonstration of attitude in prayer.  This implies that women are to pray with a similar outward demonstration, adorning themselves to fit that attitude.  And this implies that they are speaking prayers just as the men are.  Paul’s emphasis is not on what they wear.  It is on who they bring to the spotlight.  Men must be careful not to let anger or doubt take center stage.  Women must be careful not to let pride and appearance take center stage.  But both men and women are called to pray.

Now we  come to the next problem of order in the church.  Only this time Paul uses the singular Greek word gune, not the plural gunaikas.  This leaves us with two interpretations.  In English, this could mean “a woman” is a singular class noun, that is, a reference to all people in the class “woman.”  But it could also mean a particular woman.  In other words, Paul may be saying, “Let this woman,” a particular woman whose name is withheld, not be allowed to teach.  Since Timothy knew exactly who Paul meant, Paul does not need to spell it out.  A woman in the congregation was teaching heretical views.  She is to be forbidden to do so.  It is significant that Paul shifts from the plural in verse 9 to the singular in verse 11.  If he wanted to speak about all women, why wouldn’t he simply continue to say “Women must learn in silence,” or “Women are not permitted to teach.”  Once again we see that the clear meaning of the text isn’t quite a clear as we have been taught. 

Finally, we need to look at another passage addressed to Timothy.  In his second letter to Timothy, Paul says, “And what you heard from me through many witnesses, commit these things to faithful people, such as will be competent also to teach others.”  Here is the same context.  Paul wants only certain people to teach the gospel.  We might have expected Paul to say, “faithful men” if he is going to be consistent with that interpretation of his advice in his first letter.  But that is not what Paul says.  He uses the Greek word anthropos, a word for all Men, that is, the class of everyone who is human – both men and women, instead of the Greek word aner which means only males.  Anthropos is the same Greek word used in the translation of “Let us make man in our own image,” and no one claims that God only created males.

What a tragedy it is that the influence of the Greek early church fathers and the general opinion of the Roman Catholic church for a thousand years led us to read these verses without looking deeper into the text.  Maybe we need to backup.  Things aren’t always what they seem.  If you don’t believe me, I have 40 acres for sale in Arizona.

Topical Index:  teach, women, gune, gunaikas, aner, anthropos, 1 Timothy 2:11-12, 2 Timothy 2:2, context