“And it shall come to pass that whoever shall call on the name YHWH shall be saved; . . “ Joel 2:32
Saved – Have you ever heard this verse in an evangelistic crusade? If you knew that the Hebrew verb didn’t mean “saved” from eternal damnation, would you be surprised? Would it drive you back to the context to examine what the prophet Joel really said?
The verb here is malat. You can find it in Job 41:19 and Genesis 19:17. Look at those two occurrences before you decide what the verb means. What did you discover? This word is about escape, not about forgiveness. It’s about getting away from disaster, not about avoiding hell. Of course, in Esther 4:13 and Psalm 89:48, it’s about escape from death, but the death in that context is immediate, physical demise. Perhaps this little insight helps us to see how much of our biblical interpretation is filtered by our evangelical eyesight. A Jew wouldn’t think that salvation was first about eternal life or punishment. For a Jew, salvation is first about escaping immediate danger right here. The question, “Are you saved?” is pretty much an invention of D. L. Moody and Billy Graham, not Sha’ul, Peter (Kefa) or Yeshua.
There’s something else about this verse that we need to reconsider. Who is rescued? Who escapes? Those who call on the name YHWH. Of course, calling on the name of YHWH doesn’t mean what evangelicals think it means either. You see, calling on the name of YHWH goes all the way back to Genesis 4:26, long before anyone had any idea about the sacrificial death of God’s Son. In fact, “calling on the name” is a technical phrase for ownership. In other words, when men began to call on the name of YHWH, they were espousing their fidelity to YHWH. They were declaring that they belonged to Him. He was their master or owner. That meaning didn’t change. When Joel speaks God’s words and uses the same phrase, he means (and so does God) that those who escape will be those who belong to YHWH. The Master takes care of His own.
Of course, there’s a very big difference between claiming to belong to the household of the Master and actually being one of His slaves. What’s the difference? A slave is obedient. A slave depends entirely on the Master. A slave does not have another agenda. Those who merely visit the house may look like they are residents, but when the orders and directions come from the Master, the difference becomes obvious. Some follow. Some do not. Only those who follow will escape.
Joel’s verse certainly could have wider implications. Kefa (Peter) seemed to think so. He initiated his great invitation to God-fearing, devout men with this very verse. He applied the verse to a different context, something rabbinic Judaism often did. But even Peter wouldn’t dare suggest that obedience was optional. Escape, deliverance, rescue or salvation – whatever term you wish to employ – always entails calling on the Name and that is an idiom for obedience.
I need to remember this. I need to have it grafted into my thought patterns and my actions. God delivers. God saves. God rescues. But that does not take away my need to obey. I have a part to play – not in God’s grace but in demonstrating my fidelity to His ownership. Faith without works doesn’t work. “Lord, help me. I want to be Yours. I desire to belong. I am grateful for escape which You provide. But never let me take it for granted. I love you. I serve you.”
Topical Index: save, malat, Joel 3:5, Genesis 4:26, obedience, calling on the Name
Recent Comments