New Testament Commentary

For whatever things were written before were written for our instruction, that through patience and encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.  Romans 15:4

Whatever – First word emphasis.  Once again we see Paul rearrange the vocabulary in order to highlight a thought.  Here the first word is “whatever” (hosa), a word that we have encountered before (March 18).  You’ll remember that this is an extension word.  It is used to extend our thought from one place to another.  Here, of course, it is about extending the range of God’s instructions about life across the whole of Scripture, from the Torah to the Prophets to the Wisdom literature.  All of it was written to instruct us.

Paul’s sentiment is an interesting one, especially so given the usual interpretation that the Old Covenant has been supplanted by the New Covenant and the church had temporarily replaced Israel.  If there were ever a man who was in a position to set aside the writings of the Hebrew Scriptures, Paul would be the man.  He knew the Scriptures better than any other follower of Yeshua.  He vigorously upheld the doctrine that salvation comes by faith.  He was the apostle of grace.  Yet, here Paul extends the worthiness of the Hebrew Scriptures beyond the first five books (the Torah).  He claims that it was all written for our instruction.  In fact, his reference in the same sentence to “Scripture” leaves no doubt about what he means.  Paul, the “New Testament” apostle, claims that his “Old Testament” Bible is the source of our hope.

Of course, Paul would never have put it quite that way.  The designation “New Testament” and “Old Testament” happened hundreds of years after Paul was dead.  For Paul, there was only one Scripture, the Hebrew Bible.

Some might argue that this only means the Old Testament Scriptures are background.  They inform the New Testament but they are no longer applicable, in much the same way that early Greek science had an effect on the modern scientific method, but is only of historical interest.   That could be the case, except for Paul’s use of the word “Scriptures.”  Paul considers these writings sacred, inspired and fully fit for instruction in righteousness.  They are not left-overs.  They are the only source of real hope in the day that he wrote this verse to the Roman believers.  The Old Testament was the source of encouragement, hope and direction for these believers.  How could they look anywhere else?  Nothing of the New Testament was canonized and much of it wasn’t even written.  The first-century believers didn’t make up their code of behavior as they went along.  They joined an already-existing stream of devoted followers who happened to be of the house of Israel.  They were grafted into a culture and a standard that had been part of God’s community for 2000 years.  Do we really think that Paul tossed it all out and started over?  That’s not what Paul says.

Maybe we’re the ones who threw out the Scriptures and started over.

Topical Index: Scriptures, grace, law, instructions, Romans 15:4

PS – We’re going to try again. Israel in October. Click here to read more and sign up on the list if you’re seriously interested.

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom White

I think the point is that GOD’s revelation is progressive. It is the early Sciptures that form the foundation of who Messiah is and what His work was about. Without a true understanding of the Law, Prophets, and Writings [TaNaK- Torah-Nevim-Ketuvim aka “Old Testement”] we can be mislead about the mission of the Messiah. It is realizing that only by placing the “testimony of Messiah” in alignment with the previous revelation of GOD in the TaNaK that we can avoid going off-track. 🙂

Yolanda

Maybe? There is no doubt! Before you read on you must be advised that once you know the truth you are responsible for it, so if you want to keep living in ignorance and not be held responsible for the knowledge contained herein, STOP READING NOW.

I blindly accepted what I heard from the pulpit without searching the scripture myself for so many years and now realize how blindly stupid! Now that I understand the true perspective; I am reading a letter that was written to someone 2000 years ago and the only reference I have is the Old Testiment; so whatever it would have meant to them then is how I am to interpret it now. Duh! When I put myself in the time frame the letter was written in it makes so much sense. And it did not change meanings over the years. God’s word is the same yesterday, today and forever. What it meant back then, when it was written to whome it was written, is what it means to me today! Yes, what was said still applies to me, but I MUST read it from the perspective of reading it as if I am reading it WHEN it was written. Why did I not get that before? Because, Satan wants to decieve the whole world.

Acts 13: 42, 17:2, 18:4 Paul observed the Shabbat.
1 Corinthians 5:8 Paul kept Passover (Sesach).
Acts 20:16 Paul observed Shavu’ot (Pentecost) in Jerusalem.
Ephesians 4:25 Paul believed in the prophets (Zechariah 8:16) and the words of the Writings (Psalms 4:4)
1 Timothy 1:8-11 Paul called the Torah “sound teaching”.
2 Timothy 2:15 Paul called the Torah the “Word of Truth”
Romans 16: 25-27 Paul called the prophets “Scripture” and that it was able to lead the nations into obedience and trusting faith in YHWH.
1 Corinthians 14:21 Paul called the writings of the prophet Isaiah “Law” and he accepted his teachings.
Acts 15: 22-31 Paul believed in the Torah laws reguarding blood (Lev. 17:10, 18:19) lewdness/fornication (Lev. ch. 18) and Kosher (Lev. 17:13)
JUST TO NAME A FEW!!! And if we are to take notice of all the references to the disciples and believers observing the feasts and laws as the background in the stories we read in the New Testiment it is obvious they all were Torah observant. If what they said had meant for us to not follow the Torah then Paul and the whole lot of the disciples and writers of the New Testiment are a bunch of hypocrites and we should not listen to them anyway!!! Then we are only left with the Old Testiment and the Torah.

Tom White

Sister,
First of all I want you to know that I agree with all that you have said. 😎
Second of all I want to caution that we are called to be salt as well as light. 😉
Since readers cannot see our faces on these blogs, they cannot tell if the writer is admonishing them 🙁 , or encouraging them 🙂 .
I find that using these little “smiley faces” helps in taking the edge off our written words. If anyone would like to use them and do not know how- here it is:
colon, dash, right parenthesis = 🙂 =smiley face
semi-colon, dash, right parenthesis = 😉 =winking smiley face
colon, dash, left parenthesis = 🙁 =frowning face

Shalom alechem 🙂

Yolanda

🙂 Thank you. Your smiley face came out cuter than mine.