Change of Direction

“How long will you go here and there, O faithless daughter? For the LORD has created a new thing in the earth – A woman will encompass a man.” Jeremiah 31:22

Encompass – The last step in understanding the role and status of women in the Old Testament is the discussion of the “new” covenant. Christian interpreters make a very big deal of the new covenant in Christ, but the idea is not quite a new as they would have us believe. Hundreds of years before the birth of Yeshua HaMashiach, Jeremiah gave us God’s description of the new covenant. In fact, the passages in Jeremiah are the only place in Hebrew Scripture where God speaks of a new covenant. But what God says is not quite what we have learned as Christians because God does not talk about an entirely new, novel arrangement. The word in Hebrew is hadash, an adjective that comes from the verb stem H-D-Sh. The verb means “to renew, to restore, to renovate or rebuild.” It is used to describe the restoration of the temple, the revitalizing of one’s spirit, the reconstruction of cities and the rebuilding of the earth. The noun form of the word is used of the “new” moon. Obviously, the moon is not created brand new. It is the same moon seen once again. While hadash can also mean new in the sense of never before, it is noteworthy to mention that the idea of the renewed moon occurs 280 times in Scripture, the verb only 10 times and the adjective 53 times including all of the occurrences where the word clearly means “renewed.” Obviously, the dominate theme is not brand new but rather renewed or restored. This dominance is substantiated by the translation in the LXX where the word carries the meaning of a measure of time governed by the lunar calendar.

But the real surprise comes in the use of hadash in Jeremiah. Westerman asserts “Only during the time of the exile was anything said in Israel about something new in its interaction with God – nowhere else in its whole history.” What this means is that if we are going to understand the “new” covenant from an Hebraic point of view, we will have to understand it from Jeremiah’s perspective. And what God reveals through Jeremiah is that He will change the modus operandi of His covenant instructions, not the content. When the “new” covenant becomes a full reality, the Torah will be written on the hearts of men, instruction will become unnecessary and all will serve the Lord. Nowhere does Jeremiah indicate that God will erase the “old” covenant and replace it with something brand new. The passage simply says that God will restore and renew His original through a different method. This is exactly what we would expect as Hebrews. God gave the Torah as THE words of life. There is no reason to think that God has changed in His character, purposes or directions. What is good for life is still good for life.

Now, if Jeremiah is talking about the restoration of the original, then the Lord’s statement in 31:22 takes us right back to Genesis 2:18. North sees the impact of such a radical shift. It is worth reading his analysis:

Jer. 31:22 speaks of a “new thing,” apparently cognate to the “new thing” in Jer. 31:31, which furnishes our chief clue to the theological value of newness in the Bible. V. 22 stands as the climax to several oracles: . . . [Combined attempts to translate the passage lead to] “Everything will be different, all values will be reversed, even things so profoundly rooted as the psychology of the sexes will be turned upside down.”

Jeremiah 31:22 reveals more than a declaration of a radical reversal of values. We see that the verse uses the word nekavah (female, woman). Remember that nekavah has a homophone that means “boundary”. This is the next thought of God’s declaration in Jeremiah. The nekavah (boundary setter) will “surround” or “enclose” the man. Sabab is the Hebrew verb for “to surround, go around and encircle.” But it also means “to turn back, to change, to turn around.” Do you suppose that in the renewed covenant, in the return to the original design plan of God, a woman will be the instrument to turn a man around? Will God now use a woman to enclose the man as his protector? Will He use the woman to change direction so that a man will come back to the original? Will she once more become the real ‘ezer kenegdo?

The word for “man” in this translation is not ish. It is not zakar (male, remember). It is geber. Why the change? Why don’t we find the usual opposing pairs: male-female, man-woman? The Hebrew word geber does mean “man” but it “often contains more than just a reference to gender by referring to the nature of man, unusually with overtones of spiritual strength or masculinity, based on the verb gabar, meaning to be mighty.” This is warrior language. The implication is that even the mightiest of men will now find protection and direction from the nekavah. Yes, the world will be turned upside-down. When God restores the original, the ‘ezer kenegdo will once again be the rescuer, the spiritual director and the one who keeps me face before the Lord.

Is that what’s happening in your marriage? Are you being renewed? If you’re looking for a mate, are these the characteristics that come at the top of your list?

Topical Index: ‘ezer kenegdo, nekavah, geber, new covenant, surround, Jeremiah 31:22


cf. 1 Samuel 11:14, 2 Chronicles 15:8, Psalm 104:30, Psalm 51:10. Isaiah 61:4 and Lamentations 5:21

cited in R. North, “chadash, chodesh” Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (Eerdmans, 1980), Vol. 4, p. 236.

R. North, “chadash, chodesh” Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (Eerdmans, 1980), Vol. 4, p. 237.

Warren Baker and Eugene Carpenter, The Complete Wordstudy Dictionary Old Testament (AMG Publishers, Chattanooga, 2003), p. 183.

Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yolanda

I see the geber in the topic index. Your interpretation I have never heard before. Do you have more on this subject? Any other knowledge from other folks around are welcome also. Please.

ANTOINETTE (Canada)

I went to the blue letter bible and put in the verse reference, the I broke out the sentence in Hebrew by clicking on the “C” icon at the left of the verse. This enabled me to click on the strongs number beside the word geber (or any other word in the verse) for an in depth meaning. very powerful study tool. here is the link:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Jer&c=31&v=22&t=NASB#22

ANTOINETTE (Canada)

Jer 31:22 “How long will you go here and there, O faithless daughter? For the LORD has created a new thing in the earth– A woman will encompass a man.”

I have heard people teach on this verse before, but now the connections seem so obvious. God calls Israel ” daughter”, Israel has always been placed in the role of a woman, (ezer kenegdo)
He says in Ex.19:6 and you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.’ These are the words that you shall speak to the sons of Israel.”

They are connected, and it will be fascinating to see how the whole is brought about.
Lots to think and meditate on there, thanks Skip.

Michael

Hi Antoinette,

I was focusing on “O faithless daughter” and didn’t connect her to Israel, but it is obvious now.

“A woman will encompass a man” caught my attention; then couldn’t get the Vitruvian Man out of my mind.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitruvian_Man

ANTOINETTE (Canada)

Hi Michael,
Can you share what you see, or how this image speaks to you about the scripture Jer 31:22 ?

Michael

Hi Antoinette,

Sure. First let me say that my question to myself was why did I make a connection to the Vitruvian Man and not see the obvious connection to Israel 🙂

I don’t know much about Leonardo Da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man in the first place and my connection might not be of any significance.

But I tried to imagine how a woman could “encompass” a man and could not imagine it except in an abstract way like a circle around a man.

When I think of a symbol of a man, I think of a cross.

And a cross is a matrix and a matrix is a quadrant and a quadrant is a square and a circle in a square is a universal symbol of God, as I understand it.

Put the cross in the circle and the circle in the square and you have an abstraction of the Vitruvian Man.

The Vitruvian Man a symbol of perfection and wholeness that you can find in my view in Adam and Eve before the Fall, in the non Alienated Man of the so called young Marx of the1844 Manuscripts, and in the Androgynous Soul of Hester Prynne in the Scarlet Letter (1850).

Adam and Eve, Karl Marx, and Nathaniel Hawthorne (not to mention Moby Dick) are all clearly connected in my mind :-).

ANTOINETTE (Canada)

How I see the Woman (Israel) encompassing the man is beautifully expressed in Isaiah Chapter 60 -verse 21 even mentions the branch of My planting.

Michael

“Then all your people {will be} righteous; They will possess the land forever, The branch of My planting, The work of My hands, That I may be glorified.

Yes I agree it is a beautiful “utopian” vision of Israel encompassing man. I always enjoy re-reading Isaiah, but sometimes the metaphors leave me a bit bewildered.

carl roberts

<>

I am bringing out the heavy hammer. I do not know why it is but brother Skip you seem to not bother writing to include the word “blood.” The red stuff. The stuff that flows in our veins. Blood is life. The life of the flesh is in the blood. Why the avoidance?? If I’ve gone to toe-stepping, I apologize. Am I mad enought to see red? hmm.. Those of us who have read the book are not blind in one eye and can’t see out of the other, see a red thread running from Genesis to Revelation. What is good for life is blood. What is good for life is the blood covenant. You want something old? You want something new? Good. The blood covenant is what you seek. When you read G-d’s words of life- look for it. Tell me of the tslav of the Messiah and the blood He shed. Yes, tell us of the words of the Torah for they are G-d’s words of life. This is the new testament (covenant) in my blood. The blood of G-d. Looking for life? Look no further- look to the cross of Christ. Looking for an atonement for sin? Look no further, blood has been shed, the blood of the Crucified One. Looking for peace between a G-d who is holy and a man who is sinful? Look no further, look to the propitiation of the Lamb of G-d which taketh away the sin of the world. You want religion? Make a list of rules. You want relationship? Enter in by the Door, the Son of righteousness, the Sacrifice, the One who shed His blood on the execution stake and became Sin who knew no sin. I would ask in all of our Torah study and these wonderful words of revelation, that these words be tinted with the color red. I’m putting the hammer down now. Shalom. I “am dying” to hear about the Lamb who was slain. Tell us of the blood covenant. G-d was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself. Reconciliation, renewal, regeneration, relationship, rejoicing.. in the cross of the Crucified. “Behold the Lamb of G-d which taketh away the sin of the world”. Blood has been spilled..G-d’s blood. Tell me about it. What can wash away my sin? What can make me whole again?

Shawn

This may be more of a reply to Carl’s comments. Although, it seems to fit the discussion of the “new” covenant. I found these interesting verses while reading Jeremiah recently. I took a journal note of them due to their clear prophetic perspective into God’s character and plan. They also fall before and after the popular Jer 31 chapter.

The first time I read these the last few words of ch 33 verse 16 struck me as significant with the NT concept of righteousness in Christ.

“The fierce anger of the LORD will not turn back Until He has performed and until He has accomplished The intent of His heart; In the latter days you will understand this.” Jer. 30.24

‘Behold, days are coming,’ declares the LORD, ‘when I will fulfill the good word which I have spoken concerning the house of Israel and the house of Judah. ‘In those days and at that time I will cause a righteous Branch of David to spring forth; and He shall execute justice and righteousness on the earth. ‘In those days Judah will be saved and Jerusalem will dwell in safety; and this is the name by which she will be called: the LORD is our righteousness.’ Jer. 33:14-16

carl roberts

I do want to apologize brother Skip for this “zealous” outburst. The danger I see here is that man is the center rather than Christ. It has been said.. (and I believe rightly so), there are only two men who ever lived. Adam #1 and Adam #2. The question following this would be-which Adam am I? I can tell you without studder or stammer, I was Adam #1 and now because of the regeneration of the new birth, I am “in Christ” (or Adam #2). Now, to return the focus on today’s word.. “encompass”. But (laughingly), I will “stick to my guns” and in order to rightly divide the word of truth, it is necessary to ‘don the red spectacles.” Jeremiah is speaking of course prophetically and mentions in this particular Scripture reading.. a faithless daughter, the creation of a new thing in the earth, and a woman encompassing a man. First in line: faithless daughter. Who would this refer to and why? (referring to history- “the way we know our future is by looking at our past”- now who did I get that “good word” from?)-faithless daughter would be who? Israel? hmm.. Next, G-d performs a “new thing or a new creation” referring to what act or incident? Has this occurred or is it yet to be? And finally “a woman shall encompass a man”. Would this reference to a woman (ezer) encompassing a man (geber) have a counterpart in the New Testament (they do seem to balance each other).. as an admonition for us “to be strong in the LORD and in the power of His might?” I am thinking of Eliezer the servant of Abraham at this moment whose name means- G-d is my “ezer”, which includes all the riches of the “ezer.” Looking forward to your forthcoming book on this “ezer” brother Skip, (and also maybe the soon-coming companion volume on Adam’s purpose as the servant!) Final thought.. “it is not good for man to be alone” to which I add my small “amen”, and thank my G-d, He has promised (via blood covenant!), I will never leave you or forsake you- I will not leave you comfortless, “I will come to you”. Immanuel- “G-d with us”. The Comforter, the Holy Breath- G-d in us, and our Abba above, G-d over us. And are we comforted/strengthened by this?

Drew

Very nice Skip very nice.

I do have a question for you my brother. “Is it possible that the reference you speak of (the ezer encompassing the geber) is also directly related to Yeshua’s Earthly mother and how in fact the “new thing” is being wrought through the ezer …. how the mighty one Yeshua (the second Adam) arrives …. in contrast to the original Adam?”

I have often marveled how Miriam is remarkably different with respects to creation than was Havah. Havah did not submit …. whereas Miriam did submit. Havah wanted to control her own destiny and Miriam simply had faith. Havah was wrought from Adam (Woman from Man), yet Yeshua in Earthly form was wrought from Miriam (Man from Woman). And we know as well that Miriam encompassed our Lord from the womb to the tomb. Her role was notably a life long role!

I could ramble on I suppose … yet I was simply wondering if this passage from Jeremiah can not be viewed in the most basic of constructs …. Mashiach, Ha B’rit Chadasha and Bereshiyt. Or as usual … the story of the Son revealed! 🙂

Ultimately we do end up in a similar place …. the dynamic is changed …. “this is something new” and the mode in bringing about reconciliation paints a different story regarding the introduction of creation … or in the case of Yeshua …. the new creation.

Personally however I can not help but view this construct first in terms of Yeshua given the overall context of Jeremiah Chapter 31. This being said I found the diverse perspective enlightening! 🙂

Drew

True …. this is a construct that would not have readily been discernable without hindsight …. admittedly”significant hindsight”!

It does as you point out speak to His eternal awesomeness!

On another note … most often Jeremiah is referenced as the definitive reference to the B’rit Chadasha … yet I do not understand why Deuteronomy Chapter 30 is not viewed in the context of B’rit Chadasha …. am I not understanding this correctly? Or is it once again a matter of the context only being relevant dare I say “hindsight”?

🙂

Chanelle

AWESOME……Mr.Skip Moen I was talking to my husband about this verse and that’s what the holy spirit reveal to me I praise God for my husband who search out a matter and found your website. Thanks Sir keep letting God use you.

Jacqueline

I have discussed, pondered, prayed about these things with Elohim and when I read your post I also thought about the verse in Hosea you will call me Ishi.