Feast Or Famine
“but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you may not eat, for in the day that you eat of it, you shall surely die.” Genesis 2:17
Surely Die – Hebrew handles emphasis by manipulating the structure of the language. Without punctuation, words are arranged in ways that draw attention to particular ideas. You will remember the previous verse where the Hebrew words achol tochel (eat freely) emphasizes the diversity and sufficiency of God’s garden of delight by repeating the root achal twice (tochel is a form of achal). Doubling the word puts emphasis on the idea. Putting the word in first or last position in the sentence does the same. In this verse about the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, another word is doubled. That word is mot. The verse in Hebrew doesn’t say “surely die.” It says “die die” just like the verse says “eat eat.”
OK, so we know something about the structure of this language. So what? Ah, but there’s something else happening with this structural arrangement that we need to know. Hebrew thought is often grouped inside word frames called an inclusio. Remember that Hebrew doesn’t have paragraphs either. So, if I want to draw a frame around one particular idea, I must draw the frame with words. A double word in one place draws my attention to a double word in another place. I am encouraged to consider the similarities or differences between the doubled words in order to understand the full thought of the narrative.
The first doubled word (achol tochel) describes the magnificent fecundity of God’s delightful provision. Everything I need is present and available to me. Of course, this is a lot more than fruit salad (remember that). Here’s the important point. The words used for enjoying God’s full provision are descriptive. They state the facts about the Garden. It is a place where true satisfaction is found under every tree – except one. In the same “frame,” the words about dying are also descriptive. Under that one tree, life as defined by God comes to an end. But this is a description of the facts, not a prescription. God isn’t giving Adam a rule. He’s telling Adam the way it is. “If you eat of that tree, then this will happen.” The parallel double words connect descriptive statements. God doesn’t command Adam to eat from every tree. He offers every tree. In the same way, God warns Adam about the one tree. In both cases, God states the facts.
Why is it important to notice that the parallelism inside the frame is descriptive rather than prescriptive? Because we can’t understand the punishment for disobedience if we don’t understand the structure of the prohibition. God says (descriptively) that eating from this one tree will result in mot tamoot. Adam eats. But he doesn’t die instantly, does he? He lives for many, many years. So, Christian theology accounts for this discrepancy by saying that Adam died spiritually. But that doesn’t maintain the parallelism. The opposition is between fully satisfied and empty. Feast or famine. Adam’s choice is between God’s design for delight or his decision to make his own garden. What Adam loses in his choice is the place of God’s delightful life. He is thrust out of the Garden into a world of his own making without the delightful provisions of God. As a result of disobedience, he experiences insufficiency. He has to labor to find delight.
We tend to think that Adam’s sin resulted in spiritual separation and spiritual separation results in death. From this, we proceed to the need for repentance and redemption. In other words, we connect Adam’s sin with Yeshua’s death, placing them both in the spiritual arena. Of course, there is a connection between Adam’s disobedience and Yeshua’s redemption. Sha’ul is quite clear about this. But this isn’t the only consequence. As the concluding element of the frame, mot tamoot describes what it means to be outside of God’s delight. It isn’t just spiritual death. It’s alienation from the provision of God. Adam’s sin turns delight into destitution. To live under God’s umbrella is to experience His provision. To disobey is to experience emptiness and struggle. There’s more to death than spiritual eventualities.
Topical Index: die, mot tamoot, delight, Genesis 2:17
Good Morning
As everyone knows a teacher must be sure that the student learn the concept that he/she wants to communicate. In this case is pretty, I would say quite interesting, the way that God must guarantee Himself that Adam catch the concept of death. How Adam can understand what is death if that experience does not exist at Eden??? Does Adam knows what is death, does death was present at Eden when God was teaching him what would happen if he “eat” from “daat”? What relation has this word “daat” with the “daat” used to describe the sexual intercourse between Adam and Eve in Genesis 4:1??? Questions, many questions, as Einstein said: never stop asking questions. Thank you very much!!!!
A hard presentation, Skip. It smacks against so much that I have been reading, particularly from C. Gordon Olson, who talks about the spiritual death that happened with the fall and that death only is reversed for those who accept Christ. I liked what you had to say far more than what Olson said. Like is not the best term. What is to like? However, for me, and I the ring of truth is closer to what you, and I thank you.
I love definition. Especially high-definition. Clarity. So does YHWH. He says what He means and He means what He says. G-d is not ambigous as we love to be. I still remember a former POTUS trying to hide behind “it depends on what the meaning of “is” is. Faldoral. We are not the children of confusion, we are the children of clarity. Adam disobeyed G-d and when He did, that very moment, death” or separation from G-d took place. How can I say that and how can I be so sure? Because G-d is holy and cannot look upon sin. When Adam polluted himself by deliberately refusing what G-d has said and choosing instead to eat of the forbidden fruit, G-d had to “abandon ship” and leave Adam. Adam was defiled and needed both a washing and a covering sacrifice later provided by His Creator. Death is separation. Sin separates us from G-d. Isaiah 59.2 simpy states “But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear.” Now, I’m not so naiive as to suggest I am any better than Adam, but rather Adam and I share the same propititaing covering provided by YHWH for our transgressions. Thank G-d for the atoning blood of the Lamb. There is a way provided for a sinful man such as myself to enjoy fellowship and walking in the garden in the cool of the evening with our Creator just as grandpa Adam did years ago. We can go “back to the garden” and our Father has reinstated our privileges of access to Him. I’ve also heard it said and agree, “we gain more in Christ, than we lost in Adam.” Hallelujah, once again, for the cross!
Carl, I am not so sure “we can go back to the garden” or that I would want to. For even thought I know that I have Christ in my corner, I also know that I have Adam tugging on my arm. I am not sure I would handle the Garden any better than Adam did!
No Carl, you couldn’t. The Holy Spirit would have to cleanse and empower you.
-I am not sure I would handle the Garden any better than Adam did!-
Hey Roy! I agree, you would not! (and neither would I!). Why? Because in (the first) Adam, -all die. (I Corinthians 15.22) Another verification of the truth.. “all have sinned.” “All” is a very inclusive word and I (and you) are included in this little big word.
Well… we heard the bad news.. now for some good news! Part B.. the “rest of the story!” I Corinthians 15.22 (part 2) states “..so all will be made alive in Christ.” Dead in the first Adam, but alive in the Second Adam.. Christ. The question today is this.. – Are we “in Adam” or are we “in Christ?” Am I (now) “in Christ?”
And may I be allowed to say without a stutter, or stammer.. Hallelujah, praise His name.. I am! Wooooooohoooooooooo! If the Son shall make you free.. you, my friend, will be free indeed!! Do you know (today) what you have and who you are “in Christ?” (oh yeah.. babe!- ask your Father to reveal this to you and “I guarantee it”.. your feet will leave the ground! Rejoice “in the LORD”, and again I say unto you… rejoice! Our G-d is an awesome G-d!
Seems to me that we have two choices, we can either mediate desire for God through Jesus or make direct connections to God.
Jesus can help us restore our experience of Eden, our connection to God, but Jesus does not replace this world with Eden.
Adam had a full time job in the Garden; we are lucky to have a part time job anywhere, with or without Jesus as far as I know.
We all start out in the womb, but we must live in the real world.
It has been said (and I personally agree), one of the best gifts if not the best gift G-d ever gave to man was the ability to choose. We do have a choice and a “say” in the matter. “Choose you this day” (who you will serve)- and yes, we will serve somebody. Either “self” or the Savior, we have a choice. Our blessing comes with our choosing, since every choice will be followed by a consequence. We have been given a choice to listen to G-d’s instructions for living (or not). What is the consequence of obedience? What is the consequence of sin? (disobedience). Choose you this day…
Hi Carl,
I think that at any given moment we have three choices; we can choose to serve one of the following:
– self
– Savior
– God