Rabbi Sha’ul on Scripture

but just as it is written, “Things which eye has not seen and ear has not heard, and which have not entered the heart of man, all that God has prepared for those who love Him.” 1 Corinthians 2:9 (quoting Isaiah 64:4 and 65:17)

As It Is Written – Most Christian commentaries recognize that Paul’s quotation of two passages in Isaiah doesn’t quite match the Isaiah text.  Paul makes some changes in the verbs and draws the two passages together even though they are separate in the original.  Of course, Paul’s motivation is to show that the great prophet Isaiah reveals imagery about God’s plan of salvation which has now come to fruition.  This is once again an example of a rabbinic technique – gezerah shavah – reasoning from a similarity in one verse to a similarity in another.  Isaiah’s revelation about the inability of human beings to decipher God’s intentions is connected with the idea that God has stored up His revelation for those He loves.  Rabbi Sha’ul recognizes this connection and employs it in his argument about God’s wisdom and mystery.

What we discover is that Sha’ul writes just like any other rabbi of the first century.  What we conclude is that his readers recognized this technique because it was very familiar to them.  What we discover is another case of the thoroughly Jewish nature of the early congregations of Messianic believers.  Whether Jew or Gentile, Sha’ul treats them the same.  He expects that they will follow his argument, see the connection to the Tanakh (Older Testament) and recognize the appropriate context in Isaiah even if he changes a few things along the way.

So, what do we do with the phrase “as it is written” (kathos gegraphtai)?  It’s quite clear that it actually isn’t written the way Sha’ul cites Isaiah.  But Sha’ul nevertheless claims Tanakh authority for this citation.  What’s happening here?

We have seen this before.  In fact, this behavior occurs throughout the New Testament by nearly every author and by Yeshua Himself.  So, it’s not unique.  The evidence is plentiful.  And what the evidence demonstrates is that the authors of the New Testament (and Yeshua) exhibit the transmission of meaning rather than the transfer of information.  In other words, they are not concerned about the actual words of the quotation.  They are providing commentary on the meaning of the words in the context of their arguments.  It’s like they were saying, “This is what Isaiah the prophet meant when he said.”  And since they are acting like rabbis, they consider the transmission of the meaning as Scriptural authority.  Therefore, they can say, kathos gegraphtai – “as it has been written.”

This all seems perfectly reasonable until we run into contemporary doctrines of inspiration and inerrancy.  Those doctrines often stand on a Greek base, proclaiming the exact duplication of transmitted information rather than a modified text focused on meaning.  Problems result.  Apparently the rabbis didn’t worry about such things.  We might ask why they showed so little concern about the actual words of the Tanakh.  What we discover is that everyone knew what the Tanakh said so no one was confused when a rabbi altered the text to fit his point.  Maybe that’s why we have such difficulty with fitting all this together into a doctrine of exact transmission.  Maybe in our assemblies we really don’t know what the text says.  In our anxiety about getting it right, we run to the details in the words rather than allowing the Spirit to help us see the meaning behind the words.  Maybe we wouldn’t be quite so frantic about the doctrine if we knew the Bible much better than we do.  What do you think?

Topical Index:  as it is written, kathos gegraphtai, rabbinic technique, 1 Corinthians 2:9, Isaiah 64:4, Isaiah 65:17

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Amanda Youngblood

I think there is a lot of confusion because of our “interpretations” of the Bible. I was looking for information about something I heard in one of Skip’s talks and found this site (http://www.tentmaker.org/books/TheTitheisIllegal.html). Part of his argument is that the Old Testament/Mosaic law is no longer relevant and that we’re misinterpreting the tithing guidelines anyway. I know that Skip explains that New Testament believers were still Jewish and still followed the Mosaic Law’s guidelines, so how does what this guy say fit in? Is this an example of an issue of “as it is written” doctrine issues? Any thoughts on what this guy says about tithing? Is the tithe, as we know it today, unBiblical? I’m getting very confused…
Thanks all! 🙂 Amanda

Rodney

Amanda,

The instructions about the tithe in Torah are quite clear. There are 3 purposes for the tithe: first, to provide for the widow, the orphan and the poor in the community; second, to provide for the Levite among you (remember, the Levites had no inheritance of land as their own, so they were provided for out of the increase of the rest of the community); third, to contribute towards the upkeep of the temple and the public worship of God. In that order.

There are also provisions for “redeeming the tithe” in case you were the one in need. Monte Judah of Lion and Lamb Ministries has an excellent audio teaching on this subject called “Corban – Giving to God”. His web site is http://www.lionlamb.net.

It would be worth the US$6.50 or so to get the mp3 download from the web site and have a listen. It would answer many questions for you. If you do want it, go to the website, click on Marketplace (I think you have to register, which is free and they don’t spam you with unwanted emails), then the MP3s link under Monte Judah.

Disclaimer – I’m not associated with Monte Judah or Lion and Lamb Ministries in any capacity; I’ve just found his teaching on certain subjects to be extremely helpful and soundly based in scripture.

carl roberts

Rodney, I agree with these three reasons for the tithe and would like to add a forth if I may.. There is a tender string attached between a man’s wallet and his.. er,uh,.. -heart. The “tithe” is a weekly reminder (a bit painful is it?) – “it all belongs to Him.’ Every bit and stitch of it. Not just a tenth. And why do we stop at money? Another mystery indeed. What do I call “my own?” I am “bought with a price and He (as the kids would say) p-owns me. He “owns” me in toto. He owns the “all” of me. “My” time, my treasure, my thoughts,my testimony, my tongue and “my” teeth all belong to Him. I am His by right of creation and by right of Calvary.
There are so many who do not realize or recognize we (the bought ones), are in a blood-covenant relationship with the (right here/right now) living G-d. It is a bit of an eye-opener to be sure but it is the “real-deal”. “Now” I belong to Jesus and Jesus belongs to me.
Does G-d “need” my money? (no..) -G-d “needs” my focused attention. Do we “think” about the tithe when we receive our paychecks? Good. This is a good thing, because we are thinking about the privilege of giving to the spread of the “good news.”
If, due to financial hardship you find yourself to be the one in need- G-d knows that, but He stills “sees” the desire of our heart!” Our “want-to!” It is a privilege to give to G-d’s work. Not just in the church, but outside the church as well. Need is everywhere. There certainly is no shortage of need and there is no shortage of grace either. “Give and it shall be given unto you” our Bible states. But I’m “poor” and can’t give.. “oh?’ Can you give a hug? Can you give a smile? Can you give of your time and energy to someone in need? Would this place a smile on the Father’s face? .. “who went about doing good..” (Acts 10.38)
YHWH wants us to live lives of generosity and liberality. I there a greater Giver than G-d? (I “believe” we don’t have to think real hard on this one!- lol!!). If we are to be “godly”, then we had better start “givin’ it away!” YHWH puts it in our hands to be distributed, not hoarded. “the liberal soul shall be made fat.” My father-in-law (now deceased and “abiding above!”) couldn’t hardly rub two nickels together and yet was one of the most generous men you’d ever want to meet! I didn’t really know the “full story” until his funeral. (funny, how that is.. )

carl roberts

I need to “sally forth” and hire a proofreader -lol! (how about “fourth” – Is that “more gooder?” I’ll have to tell “Miss Spell” about that one.. – can’t count, can’t spell.. -coming apart at the seems.. er seams- or sew it seems.

Rodney

Perhaps your spelling chequer is out to lunch 😉 LOL. Bless you, Carl. Good thoughts. My wife and I have been discussing this very issue of tithing, obedience and God’s financial planning instructions just this very night as we drove home from our niece’s baptism.

“If, due to financial hardship you find yourself to be the one in need- G-d knows that, but He stills “sees” the desire of our heart!”

Yes! Hence the instructions given for “redeeming the tithe”. This whole thing of finances is not an easy subject – it causes more strife between spouses than just about anything else (I know from personal experience). The problems occur when we try to figure out and fix things using our own wisdom and understanding instead of following “the maker’s instructions”. When we decide to walk in obedience and trust HIM for our provision, things begin to change. This is active faith. Walk in obedience and trust God to work out the details. He knows what we need, and he’ll make sure its there at exactly the right time. Not when we think we need it, but when He knows we need it.

It is a hard lesson to learn, and it doesn’t just apply to finances. I just pray that we can all learn it now while times are relatively easy, before we’re forced to learn it the hardest way possible, because we just don’t have a choice.

Carlos Berges

Dr. Moen: con este artículo usted ha aportado muchísima información a mi educación pastoral. Ahora descanso más en el momento en que predique. Ya no tengo por qué citar PERFECTAMENTE los textos pués Shaúl me está enseñando que no es tan importante como el CONTENIDO. Muchas gracias a usted por dejarse usar por Dios para enseñarnos lo que nos hace mucha falta. Bendiciones.

Amanda Youngblood

Thank you guys for sending me in a direction for more research! 🙂 I will check out both resources. I have a hard time believing someone who believes that the Old Testament is irrelevant since both Jesus and Paul used it constantly and they were both Jewish (as noted in the Biblical Worldview CDs).

Thanks again! 🙂
Amanda

Barry Jenkins

Sometimes I am troubled by Sha’ul’s use of Scripture. For example, Galatians 3:10 says: For all who rely on works of the law are under a curse; for it is written, “Cursed be every one who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, and do them.” (RSV) Sha’ul is quoting Deuteronomy 27:26: “‘Cursed be he who does not confirm the words of this law by doing them.’ And all the people shall say, ‘Amen.’ (RSV) The passage in Deuteronomy seems to place the curse only on those who don’t perform the law. Yet, Sha’ul expands the verse to make his point that anyone, obedient or not, is under a curse because of the law. Truly, at times Sha’ul can be difficult to understand.

Rodney

“Yet, Sha’ul expands the verse to make his point that anyone, obedient or not, is under a curse because of the law. Truly, at times Sha’ul can be difficult to understand.”

Indeed, Sha’ul can be hard to understand, as even Peter admitted;

[15] And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, [16] as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. [17] You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability. – 2Pe 3:15-17 ESV

That is because Sha’ul is thoroughly Hebrew in his approach, thought patterns and understanding, so when we try to interpret his writings from a Western, Greek mindset we often miss the point.

The passage in Galatians is an easy one to misunderstand if we’re not aware of the context in which it was written. Judaizers had come to Galatia preaching that, in order to come into fellowship with God and with other Jews in the synagogue, one first had to convert to Judaism, and undergo all the necessary conversion rites (including ritual circumcision or re-circumcision at the hands of a kosher rabbi) before one could be acceptable to God, and then to abide by the whole of the rabbinic oral law in addition to (and in some cases instead of) the Torah of Moses. This is what Sha’ul was arguing against.

His point was that if you’re going to submit yourself to the rabbinic law in order to earn salvation by works, then Christ is of no profit to you. These are the “works of the law” done in order to earn salvation, that bring you “under a curse”. You reject Messiah Yeshua’s sacrifice as being sufficient for salvation and you’re not obeying the Torah of Moses either.

As for everyone being under a curse, obedient or not, I like to use this illustration. Where I live we have an urban speed limit of 60 kilometers per hour (that’s about 37.5 mph). The law says that if I am caught exceeding that speed limit by a certain amount, there is a fine to pay. If I exceed it by 45km/h or more, I will lose my drivers license for a minimum period of 6 months.

The law says, “this is the limit”. The “curse of the law” says, if you exceed it, this is the penalty. When do I come “under the curse of the law”? When I break it and incur the penalty.

Have we all broken God’s laws? Absolutely. Are we all guilty? Yes. However, we have One who has become a substitute for us and taken on Himself the punishment that was due to us – He “became a curse for us”. The perfect, sinless Lamb of God, our substitute (which is what the whole substitutionary sacrifice system is supposed to teach us) took the penalty of death that was rightfully due to me! Praise God!

See, His gift of salvation had nothing to do with me. I did nothing to earn it. He called me out of Egypt (Mitsrayim – chaos and confusion) and then brought me to the mountain and proposed a marriage contract. After I agreed, then He showed me the terms of the contract – the rules of His household. Out of love for Him, I agreed to live in obedience to His rules. It has always been this way – relationship first, then obedience. There were some who tried (and apparently at least partially succeeded) to convince the Galatians otherwise, that obedience had to come before relationship. Sha’ul was correcting this and setting them back on the right path.

May I recommend if you haven’t already done so that you listen to Dr Skip’s 23-part series on Galatians. It will help a lot with your understanding not just of Galatians, but Sha’ul’s other writings as well.

Barry

Rodney,

Thanks for your reply. I am very familiar with the argument that Sha’ul was defending against the Judaizers and I have listened to Skip’s teachings on Galatians. However, I question who these Judaizers actually were. There seems to have been some very real tension among the early believers. The conflict has been referred to as the “Jesus Movement” versus the “Christ Movement.” The former requiring Torah observance and the latter not requiring it. Yeshua said to do whatever the Pharisees taught, but not what they did. Which camp would Yeshua have been in? I’m not sure. The exciting thing for me over the last few years has been the joy of learning to ask the right questions and searching for the answers. The journey is good.

Rodney

“Yeshua said to do whatever the Pharisees taught, but not what they did.”

Did he? That is what is in our English translations of Matthew, but it seems to fly right in the face of His conversations with (or rather His stern rebuke of) the Pharisees as recorded in Matthew 15…

[1] Then Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem and said, [2] “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat.” [3] He answered them, “And why do you break the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? [4] “For God commanded, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Whoever reviles father or mother must surely die.’ [5] “But you say, ‘If anyone tells his father or his mother, What you would have gained from me is given to God, [6] “‘he need not honor his father.’ So for the sake of your tradition you have made void the word of God. [7] “You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said: [8] ‘”This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; [9] “‘in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.'” [10] And he called the people to him and said to them, “Hear and understand: [11] “it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person.” [12] Then the disciples came and said to him, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?” [13] He answered, “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be rooted up. [14] “Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.” – Mat 15:1-14 ESV

And again in Matthew 23 – read the whole chapter, He really rips into them. This passage is particularly interesting though (and is the one you referred to);

“[2] “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat, [3] “so practice and observe whatever they tell you–but not what they do. For they preach, but do not practice.” – Mat 23:2-3 ESV

“Moses’ Seat” was a physical seat in every synagogue where the Scribes and Pharisees would sit to teach each Shabbat. So they literally “sit in Moses’ Seat” and in doing so purport to speak with the authority of Moses. The problem is, they didn’t teach Moses – they taught the Rabbinic codes which they had placed as a “fence around the Torah” to “protect people from breaking the Torah”; you couldn’t possibly get close enough to break the Torah because there were so many other rules and regulations that they had put in please (over 1500 just about Shabbat observance alone).

In the various Hebrew manuscripts of Matthew, the verse reads slightly differently though – there is one key pronoun that is different. It reads, “The scribes and pharisees sit in Moses’ seat, therefore whatever HE tells you diligently do, but do not do as they do, because they say but do not do“. In other words, they don’t practice what they preach.

The Pharisees didn’t even have any real scriptural authority – they were not the Levitical priesthood ordained by God for the role of teaching, instruction and service in the temple, rather they were a “ruling class” that did a deal with the Roman government pledging to keep the peace in return for government-sanctioned positions of leadership and privelege.

Yeshua opposed them at every turn, starting at the wedding in Cana right through to His mock trial. No wonder they wanted to kill Him. He threatened their authority, their status with Rome and with the people. He preached and lived the Torah the way it was designed to be from the beginning, stripping away their man-made rules, regulations and doctrines and rubbing their face in it at every opportunity. There was even some humour and irony involved at times, although because we don’t understand the Jewish culture of the day and their humour, we miss out on that too).

BTW, He didn’t give the Saducees (who were, in fact, the Levitical order in charge of the temple service) a free ride, either. Although they did not believe in, approve of or follow the Pharisaic code, they still had a few issues that Yeshua corrected them on (e.g. their denial of the resurrection). BTW, John the Baptist (Yochanan the Immerser) was a Levite Priest; he was the one, in fact, who declared Yeshua to be an acceptable sacrifice (“Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world”). That had to be done by a Levitical priest or the sacrifice was not considered acceptable. Just another little detail that we often miss.

Rodney

Oops – it appears I missed out a tag closing one of the block quotes…

carl roberts

“Cursed be he who does not confirm the words of this law by doing them.” Deuteronomy 27:26.
And here’s another delightful point to ponder.. “For the person who keeps all of the laws except one is as guilty as a person who has broken all of God’s laws.” Now, I’m just gonna have to ask myself, “have I kept all of the law(s) of G-d?” (and what do you think my answer might be?) Is is possible that I might be.. – gasp!- “a sinner?” This may come as a shock to those who know me but yes, it is true. I have sinned. Absolutely no disrespect to G-d’s law, because the law of G-d my friend is just, and pure and holy. ( “it is written” in Romans 7.12) “Be ye holy, for I am holy is the command of our Father (“it is written” in 1 Peter 1.16). I have to ask again.. am I holy? (is it getting hot in here?)..
The white hot holy heat of G-d’s Torah sets a mighty high standard of living for us. Yet none of us have kept this law in it’s entirety except for One. Romans 3.19 help us in our understanding of the perfect law of G-d – ..”that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.” Romans 3.23 puts it this way: “For all have sinned..”.
There are those in this world who today who never have been told or do not realize the “reality” of sin. It is very politically correct to call someone a sinner – they might be offended. I’ll tell you what I’ll do. I’ll concentrate on the man in the mirror and agree with what G-d says about me in His blessing book- (this is the Bible word “confess”), I am a sinner. This has been established by the perfection of the law. Galations 3:24 sheds further light on the purpose of G-d’s Torah. “Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster (paidagógos- here’s one for you brother Skip!) to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.” (KJV)
But.. don’t think we are “off the hook” by coming to Christ for salvation. Noooope. Once we have received his offer of forgiveness for all sins, (past, present and future) we then return to this “law of perfection” for the purpose of being conformed into the image of the Son. Now, through the authority of the indwelling Christ who resides within each of us who are called by His name, we are now enabled and empowered to live under the instruction and protection of the same law which once condemned us as sinners. This very same law which once condemned us as sinners now consecrates us and teaches us the way in which we must go. His word is a lamp unto our feet and a light unto our path. Instead of running from the light, I now run to the light. I want the sin in my life to be exposed to the holiness of G-d, because then I can confess it before my Father and ask for His ever extended, ever present mercy and forgiveness.
“For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven.” (Psalm 119:89) “Study this Book of Instruction continually. Meditate on it day and night so you will be sure to obey everything written in it. Only then will you prosper and succeed in all you do.” (Joshua 1.8)
We need (more than ever) to know G-d’s blessing book. Where can we go to find the will of G-d? (“it is written”). Where can we go to obtain the wisdom of G-d? (“it is written”) Where can we go to learn of the ways of G-d? (“it is written”) What a book! What a blessing!
When I discovered your words, I devoured them. They are my joy and my heart’s delight, for I bear your name, O LORD God of Heaven’s Armies. (Jeremiah 15.16)

Rodney

Great explanation, Skip – that is probably the clearest explanation of that concept that I’ve ever heard or read. Brilliantly simple, yet deeply profound! I will be keeping that one in my “tool belt” for sure!