Sabbath to Sunday

One of the central controversies about the movement from the Jewish orientation of the first century New Testament documents to the contemporary Christian culture is the place of the Sabbath. Marianne Dacy wrote her doctoral dissertation on this shift and other critical changes in the first few centuries following the death of Yeshua. Her analysis of the Sabbath controversy is worth examining. Here’s what she found:

The Shift from Sabbath to Sunday

Evidence provided by Marianne Dacy, The Separation of Early Christianity from Judaism

Dacy summaries the gradual shift with these key points:

1. There is no conclusive evidence of such a shift in the New Testament. In fact, NT writings suggest just the opposite.

2. Writings of Clemet show that Sabbath and Sunday worship were both practiced in the community. First day of the week gatherings had not replaced Sabbath and there is no connection between the resurrection and the Sunday observance.

3. The Epistle of Barnabas, a non-canonical work, is the first document to introduce the theme of replacement theology. It is strongly anti-Semitic, distorting Old Testament texts to advocate an extreme separation of Judaism and Christianity similar to the separation found in Qumran and Philo. It advocated allegorical exegesis and shows considerable Hellenistic influence (written sometime between 100 and 125AD)

4. The work of Ignatius of Antioch appears to acknowledge both Sabbath and Sunday worship, although his writing also moves in the direction of the replacement of Sabbath with Sunday worship. Ignatius was the third bishop of Antioch. He died near the end of the first century (between 98 and 117AD).

5. Justin Martyr (103-165AD) provides the most ancient detailed description of Christian liturgy. It is clear from his work that Sunday has replaced Sabbath. Justin’s description shows that the Shema is now omitted from the service. There is no reference to the death and resurrection of Yeshua as the basis for Sunday worship. Instead, the Eucharist meal is used to Christianize the Sunday worship.

6. By the late second century, Origen compares the Lord’s Day (Sunday) with the Sabbath, laying the ground for the move to treat Sunday as the “day of rest.”

7. By the third century writings begin to show disapproval for Christians who continue to observe the Sabbath.

8. Fourth century works such as the Apostolic Canons condemn anyone who observes Sabbath fasting.

“Thus, there were differences in various areas of the church. The Sabbath was regarded more favourably in places in the east such as Alexandria and Cyprus than in the west, as in Rome. However, the early church was ridden by various heresies such as docetism, arianism and gnosticism, and in some areas syncretistic forms of Christianity existed, as in Antioch, as attested by John Chrysostom in his sermons on the autumn feasts and earlier by Ignatius of Antioch. This was not an isolated case. Again, the variations may be due to lack of a strong centralising authority in Rome, the primacy of Rome being first attested in the introduction of the first Epistle of Ignatius. When the ecumenical Councils began in the fourth century, areas of the eastern Church began to split off from the Roman Church, as disagreements about the nature of Christ and the Trinity became irreconcilable. Politics, differences in culture and rivalry were also elements which contributed to this process of separation between different strands of Christianity, and the different rate of separation from the practice of the Sabbath.” (p. 188)

Dacy demonstrates that the replacement of Sabbath with Sunday was a gradual, theologically motivated shift, culminating in a declaration that this Jewish practice was no longer acceptable within Western Christian circles.  Considerable theological reconstruction was necessary to remove the obstacle that Sabbath was a part of the Decalogue, but once Sabbath was connected with the Eucharist, this shift could be justified as a superior expression of worship.

Most Christians are ignorant of this historical development, usually believing that Sunday worship began with the establishment of the “church” as recounted in Acts 2.  They do not realize that for nearly 200 years following the death of Yeshua, Christians continued to observe the Sabbath in various locations across the Mediterranean world.   Sunday only replaced Sabbath through the efforts of influential theologians and bishops who were committed to creating a distinctive difference between Judaism and Christianity.  Were it not for the work of these men, Christians would probably worship on the Sabbath today.

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ian Hodge

“Were it not for the work of these men, Christians would probably worship on the Sabbath today.”

Not necessarily. Tanakh teaching on Sabbath is as a day of rest, not worship. Worshipping on Sunday does not appear to be a violation of Sabbath. What, then is Sabbath? Is it a day of rest or a day of worship?

Dacy points out one of the great departures from Torah, changing the day. Unfortunately, the topic here does not go far enough to highlight the comprehensive Sabbath issue.

1. Sabbaths are tied to dates of the month, See Lev. 23:1ff. It is not just a Saturday or Sunday debate.

2. Sabbath year and Jubilee are just as much a part of Sabbath teaching in Tanakh as the weekly sabbaths.

3. The meaning of sabbath is just as important as the day. What does YVWH require of us on Sabbath days, Sabbath years, and Jubilee?

4. Violation of Sabbath required the death penalty (Ex. 35:2). Is this to be restored also? Or is this just another one of YVWH’s “temporary” ideas?

Yeshua as recorded in Matt; 23:23 spoke against “selective application ” of the Torah. So did Amos (5:21ff). To argue for a return to the day of the week only is an exercise in hypocrisy.

Brian

Good morning Mr. Hodge,

Thanks for your comments this morning. Permit me to share a few of my own. From your comments in the past, I recognize you probably are aware of these things.

1. G-d, Torah, a people, who he had called to inherit a particular piece of real estate. These were on the ground living together dynamic communities. Not (individuals) seeking to figure out how to live out Torah, unconnected; from this particular historical dynamic.

2. You wrote: Violation of Sabbath required the death penalty (Ex. 35:2). Is this to be restored also? Or is this just another one of YVWH’s “temporary” ideas?

Christopher J. H. Wright, in his book: Walking in The Ways Of The Lord, The Ethical Authority of the Old Testament, on page 104 and 105 writes. (1) that in many cases it is probable that the penalty specified was a maximum penalty which could be reduced at the discretion of the elders or judges handling the matter. This is clear in the law governing the use of the whip as punishment (Dt. 25:1-3). Forty strokes was the maximum penalty; the law assumes that fewer than that, at the judges’ discretion, would be normal. The fact that in a few specific cases the law prohibits any reduction of penalty (for deliberate murder, Nu. 35:31; idolatry, Dt. 13:8; and false testimony in court, Dt.19:19-21) suggests that lesser penalties were permissible in other cases. End of quote.

3. It seems to me that these maximum penalities were given to cause serious engagement with G-d and with one another; in the living out of his commands. This was Abba’s compassionate heart instructing his people. Not, if you get this wrong……………….. the stones will be on your head. Hope this does not muddy the issues you were bringing up. Blessings!

carl roberts

If we are looking for error, we do not have to look far to find it. It is abundant. One has to dig through a lot of dirt to find gold, and there is a lot of dirt to sift through. But, (and as always it is a big but), G-d has promised, “if you seek for me with all your heart, you will find me.” This promise has been made for all and any “whole-hearted” seekers, not just the intellectual elite. Intellect and reasoning are not the pathways to G-d. Back to the Bible. I want to hear “thus saith the LORD,”- not what some ________ said. “What saith the scripture.” The word of G-d is our guide and this is where our focus needs to be- not the book of Barnabas or some other “religious” work. If you don’t think Satan is at work “in the pulpit” think again. Error abounds. Garbage is plentiful. Religious “stench” is everywhere. Amen?- How much _______ must we endure? We are hungry for the truth- feed us. Where is “truth” to be found? -Not in my words, not in man’s words- but in the written word(s) of YHWH(Helpful household hint)- “Who is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification and redemption?”
Light is that which reveals. Who is the Light of the world? What is His name? We (all) need to turn to the Light. Turn your eyes upon Jesus, -look full in His wonderful face.. and the things of earth (dirt) will grow strangely dim, in the light of His glory and grace..
I will worship (the) Christ-every day. The finished work of Yashua is my Sabbath-rest. This is His open invitation to “whosoever will.” “Enter in.” The veil of the temple was ripped from top to bottom. -Hello? “Behold, I make all things new.” -Who said that?

carl roberts

False teachers-

The SOURCE Test: Is the Bible their source of information?

The SAVIOR Test: What do they believe about Jesus?

The SUBJECT Test: Is Jesus the sole object of their worship?

The SALVATION Test: Do they teach Ephesians 2.8-10

The SANCTIFICATION Test: Do they teach and preach and live holiness in their lives and ministry?

The exhortation of Jude: build yourself up in your faith

be faithful in your prayer life

keep yourselves in the love of G-d

be constantly looking for the mercy of our LORD Jesus Christ

-show mercy on those who are caught up in the teachings of the apostates and help rescue them from what they are falling into.

Ian Hodge

Carl

You missed one 🙂

The RIGHTEOUSNESS Test – Do they teach Torah as they way of right living

carl roberts

yes, -in keeping with the current alliteration- THE SCRIPTURE TEST- (Romans 3.24)

Bill Cummins

Great article on Sabbath vs Sunday worship. I understand the 10 lost tribes also switched these days.

LaVaye-Ed Billings

Skip, These guys–all of them: Bill Cummings, Carl Roberts, Ian Hodge, Brian, gave me some real needed laughs today; I have looked up the web sites of those that have them in the past, and sense that they have a love for knowledge: especially of “of the Lord”, and each have a sense of humor. What a wonderful gift to have: Humor: Clean, wholesome, within the text.

Someone notable ? once wrote, ” many a truth is spoken in “jest”. I personally want to add that humor often brings peace and added joy, and of course the scripture says is healthy for us! –Thank you Skip for the study, and for letting them/all of us write. The Comments add so very much. L.B. ( my husband will read this later, he is able to have 70 degree weather in Central TX, and is playing 18 holes of golf today, and that also brings joy and peace, and health to both of us!) –God is so Good! L.B.

Bill Cummins

I don’t understand LaVaye-Ed Billings comments. Is she making fun of Brian, Ian, Carl, and me for expressing our sincere thoughts?
BTW my last name is Cummins… not Cummings.

keith

Ball O confusion?

Keith Cooksey

Snap into a Slim Jim. Ooooh Yeahhh!!!