Dying to Know

“but the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘You shall not eat from it or touch it, or you will die.’” Genesis 3:3  NASB

Die – We need to ask some questions.  They’re not easy questions to ask – and they are even harder to answer.  But without the questions, nothing makes much sense in this story.  So, let’s start with this one.  If Adam and Havvah live in perfect paradise, what does the word mut mean to them?  That’s right.  If they have never experienced death, then what can the prescription of the command possibly mean?  How do they know that death is something bad?  In fact, how do they even know what death is?

Everything in the Garden is living delight.  God put it all there to express Himself and God is the God of life.  Hebrew, of course, isn’t like the director’s cut of a movie.  It is a terse language often expressing deep concepts in a minimum of words and quite often leaving out what doesn’t really matter to the point of the story.  So you won’t find a footnote here explaining the concept of death.  The original audience of the Genesis account had plenty of personal experience with this fact.  But Adam and Havvah didn’t.  All the first human beings knew was this:  God prohibited one act and that one act had consequences.  Even without understanding the full sense of mot, the implications are obvious.  This is not something anyone would want.

We know that Adam must understand the difference between true and false.  He must understand that what God says is right, reliable and true (emunah) and that anything else is false, wrong and unreliable.  If he doesn’t know this much, even the command is nonsense.  Rambam makes this point when he says that prior to eating of the fruit Adam knew what was true and what was false, but only after eating did he know what was good and what was evil because only after eating did good and evil become part of the personal assessment of obligation.  In other words, before he ate, Adam knew God told the truth.  After he ate, Adam knew that he was capable of living a lie.

But death?  What could that mean?  If it is simply a matter of physical existence, then the serpent told the truth.  Neither Adam nor Havvah died – immediately.  But something died in that very instant.  What died was the pure and undefiled relationship with God. What died was transparency.  A fall from grace.  Not entirely, of course, since God reinstitutes relationship through sacrifice.  But the yetzer ha’ra gained a foothold and has been struggling for supremacy ever since.

Adam communicates the commandment to Havvah.  At the end is our word, mut.  What Adam knows, and what Havvah must assume, is that mut is a condition separated from God’s goodness.  It is important to consider that Hebrew often connects mut with departing and not returning.  Adam and Havvah discover this when they are exiled.

In the end, we are left with conjecture.  But this much we are allowed to know.  Mut removes.  It removes life, order and relationship.  Adam can know that being in the presence of the Creator is life, order and relationship.  Being without Him is death.  God’s presence, even if invisible, is essential for life in any of its forms.  That is the point of the Genesis account.  We do not exist on our own.

Havvah didn’t die when she ate the fruit.  Her existence was not snuffed out in an instant.  But she and her man began a journey toward extinction, toward disorder and chaos.  They were pushed on to the path of removal.  It might be important to note that Havvah builds a fence around the command and, at the same time, opens the gate in the fence.  God said, “You will mot tamoot” (“die die” – surely die).  Havvah says, “You will temootoon.”  Not “die, die.”  Just “die” (although the final Nun may have some effect on the meaning).  We could say that God absolutely closes the door with the doubled word, but Havvah leaves it slightly ajar.  Through that small crack comes the serpent suggesting that whatever it was that God said, it isn’t quite what is true.

I wonder if we don’t leave the door just a little bit open too.

Topical Index:  death, mut, Genesis 3:3, die

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael

“MUT removes. It removes life, order and relationship.”
“Even without understanding the full sense of MOT, the implications are obvious.”

Hi Skip,

And now for something completely different 🙂

MOT in Hebrew can mean death or, I guess, God of death; but in French “MOT” means word.

In college I was strongly influenced by the thinking of Jean Paul Sartre, RD Laing, and Michel Foucault.

The Order of Things (original title: Les Mots et les choses, French for Words and Things) is a book written by Michel Foucault and published in 1966.

Laing, R.D. (1967) wrote books like The Politics of Experience and the Bird of Paradise, Harmondsworth: Penguin, and was a bit easier to understand.

RD Laing and Foucault both argued that Civilization was Madness and that in some sense the Schizophrenic was the real “Hero.”

One thing Laing said that always stuck in my mind was that Jesus, in some esoteric text, had said:

“To enter the Kingdom …
make the two things one”

In any case, what is clear to me now is that all three (Jesus, Laing, and Foucault) had the Hebrew prophets in mind.

Michael

“in some esoteric text, Jesus had said: “To enter the Kingdom, make the two things one””

Hmmm

Of course, Jesus had said the same thing in his “Lord’s Prayer”:

Your Kingdom come,
your will be done,
on earth as in heaven

carl roberts

HaSatan introduced something new into G-d’s perfect created order. He introduced “doubt”. Hath G-d said? Did G-d really say that? Surely not! -NO. Surely So. G-d did indeed, clearly say- (no doubt about it!) “don’t eat the fruit.” Whatever is not of faith (our right-response to what G-d has said) is sin. Just so we’ll know and be firmly established- what is our right-response to what G-d says (to us)? “Obedience.” Please (na) do as I ask says the Father to the son. (Ain’t that right, dads?) Oh, how we long for obedient children!
Hindsight is indeed.. 20/20. We have over two millenia of recorded history to ‘splain to us what “mot” is. I personally know what “mot” means and so do you. This old, old story continues into the present day, for the wages (yes, consequences) of sin is still to this very day- “death”/mot. And “in Adam” (the first Adam) all (continue) to die. One thing, (and one thing only) now separates us from intimate fellowship and closeness with our Creator and that one thing is..?
What do the scriptures say? Let us allow the living word(s) of G-d to speak and possibly some man might the ears to hear: “But your iniquities have separated you from your G-d; your sins have hidden His face from you, so that He will not hear. (Isaiah 59.2) The wages (payment,consequences,results) of sin (disobedience, rebellion) is death/mot/separation/division. We are divided by sin. Both vertically and horizontally- sin separates. It divides and separates us from the Source of all life- our Creator.
Let us give ear and listen attentively to this-(something we need to know) “to wit, (to know) that G-d (our Creator) was in Christ (our Savior) reconciling (bringing together) the world (yes, G-d so loved the world) unto Himself, not reckoning/imputing unto them their trespasses, (the sacred prayer of the Christ was Father, forgive them!) and having committed unto us (you and I!) the word of reconciliation.
We now may be reconciled to G-d! There is Someone who is our Advocate, our Mediator, our Attorney, our Kinsman-Redeemer, our Savior, our Shepherd/King, our Peace Speaker, our Healer, our Deliver, our Messiah. May I ask? -Do you know Him? Who is this man? and who, my friends- is this King of Glory? The LORD. Strong and Mighty. Victorious Warrior. Mighty in battle.
And now, (today) He stands in victory, sin’s curse has lost it’s grip on me. For I am His and He is mine- “bought” with the precious blood of Christ.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjZYLmi61oo

Michael

“Advocate, our Mediator, our Attorney, our Kinsman-Redeemer, our Savior, our Shepherd/King,”

Hi Carl,

I like the song and he seems to be all of the above to me.

But I tend to just “keep it simple” and wrap all of the above (“Mediator,” etc) into one thing:

The Model.

Kees Brakshoofden

Hebrew doesn’t simply state they will die, but: ‘dying you will die’ (double) – that is: the dying starts the instant you eat and will continue to the (bitter) end.

There was death in the Garder, although it was not the death of a living soul. Every fruit dies when it’s picked and eaten. So death is not completely absent. But the experience is. I always wondered why the tree of life was in the garden. Is it to cure every form of dying, that may have been present but not visible because of the working of this tree? Compare Revelation: there the trees of life are along the river to cure every disease! Is that the same kind of tree? And maybe – just maybe – Adam and Eve did encounter death in animals? Or did they eat of that tree also?

But ofcourse this is all speculation. They knew what death was after the fall: God slaughtered an animal to dress them. So from that moment on it is absolutely sure they knew what dying ment. And I think you’re absolutely right, Skip: death means being seperated from God. (IMHO ;-))