Me, Myself and Us
And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed. Genesis 2:25 ESV
Wife – Scholars have known for a long time that the Hebrew word for woman, ishshah, is not etymologically related to the Hebrew word for man, ish. We made an observation about this when we noticed that Adam changes his linguistic identification from adam (man) to ish (man) when the woman comes on the scene. But this verse may provide us with another clue about the man-woman relationship.
The word translated “ashamed” is derived from the verb bosh. This is a particularly odd verbal form called the Hithpolel, a form where the final consonant is repeated (here as b-o-s-s in yitbosasu). I find it interesting that this verbal form repeats what we find in the word “both,” a word that already means “repetition.” Here the verse seems to say that the repeating action of being both is not the repetition of repeated shame. I also find it interesting that the verb is imperfect, indicating that the action is not finished. It seems as if the verbal form and tense were chosen to perfectly fit the conceptual framework of the Hebrew idea of “both.”
What else might we learn here? The verb bosh (to be ashamed) primarily means “to fall into disgrace through failure.” That certainly sounds like a foreshadowing of the next part of the story. As foreshadowing, this clearly takes the focus off of lack of clothing and puts it squarely on the issue of obedience. To be naked and not ashamed is to obey. Clothes have nothing to do with it. TWOT reminds us “the force of bôš is somewhat in contrast to the primary meaning of the English ‘to be ashamed,’ in that the English stresses the inner attitude, the state of mind, while the Hebrew means ‘to come to shame’ and stresses the sense of public disgrace, a physical state.” [1] In other words, neither “naked” nor “shame” are about inner psychological states. In Hebrew, both concepts are about public action. We are what others observe! Declarations of faithfulness mean nothing unless the consequent, observable, public behavior is present.
The woman (wife) is the “do again” of the man. Both are repeated awareness of the uninhibited presence of God. To be naked is to be undefiled! And this repetition transparency flows into observable behavior so that there is no need to hide. In modern terms, this verse describes a relationship of unity, equally matched in direction and purpose, without personal agendas, open to inspection and exhibiting obedience as essential to existence. Over and over, without end.
I am us. We are me. Back to the Garden.
Topical Index: wife, ishshah, hithpolel, Genesis 2:25, ashamed, bosh
[1] Oswalt, J. N. (1999). 222 בּוֹשׁ. In R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer, Jr. & B. K. Waltke (Eds.), Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer, Jr. & B. K. Waltke, Ed.) (electronic ed.) (97). Chicago: Moody Press.
Than You for this work and can you Please stay on this topic for a long time.. it’s amazing.. Thank you again for this work at this time, it is nothing short of a direct word from the throne, that I needed NOW.. Bless you Skip..
I would suggest Skip’s book:
https://skipmoen.com/products/guardian-angel/
Here’s another cool little insight. The ancient Hebrew word picture for “tov” (which means “good”), per Frank Seekins, and which is Yahweh Elohim’s assessment of His creation, including the man and woman, is basically a what you see is what you get. No deception, no hidden agenda – “it is the same outside and inside.” Of course the serpent arrives with an appearance on the outside of being good but has a hidden agenda inside which is why he is “crafty”.
Thanks for this info and link Rein De Wit I will be getting that book :). Shalom
Yes. The rest of the story.
~ For the scripture says, Whosoever believes on Him shall not (ever) be ashamed ~ (Romans 10.11)
Once we do believe on Him we are therefore covered — by His grace and protection and shall be presented faultless before the throne — therefore we will never be put to shame and there is therefore no condemnation in Christ Jesus. Nothing can EVER separate us from His love.
Imagine wearing the expensive robe of Jesus’ Righteousness and being ushered –day or night, whenever we choose to go– thru legions of angel armies, each one stepping aside as we sweep past, nodding “we’ve been expecting you, go right in”– and the doors swing wide to the Most Holy of Holies where God sits in unapproachable light on the Throne.
Breathtaking! I nearly collapse– *O, not me, I am not worthy to enter, I can’t appear before a Holy God….!*, but there HE is, and He says, “I’ve been expecting you…. see, your name’s here in our guest book, the Lambs Book of Life, written in blood, you’re welcome here…welcome home, heir and child of mine!”
Genes and Salvation
Dr. Arthur Custance, writing in The Virgin Birth and Incarnation (p. 203), suggests a reason for God forming Eve from Adam’s rib rather than making her a separate creation. Through this process Eve was endowed with the same genes which Adam had and, consequently, the whole human race is derived from one set of genes. In modern genetics this would be similar to “cloning.” This is the process of using skin cells from one creature to develop an exact carbon copy of that creature. In frogs this has been partially done, but never in a human. Something similar is done in the grafting of plants. Perhaps God did something like this when He fashioned Eve from the rib of Adam.
Custance stresses that because Eve was formed from Adam’s rib, she possessed the same genes as he. This means that all people in the world (past, present and future) have descended from the same genes. It means also that when Jesus Christ was born, He too possessed genes from the same pool. Thus, He was able to be our substitute, not only in the spirit, but also in the flesh.
The Plan of Redemption depends upon the creation of man in the manner stated in Genesis. There could not be two separate creations: one for Adam and one for Eve. Unless Adam was created and then Eve taken out of him, there could not be one Redeemer to stand in the place of all men.
If we look at the Hebrew word for “naked”, arum, we see that it is closely related to the word “clever” which is applied to the serpent. How are “naked” and “clever” related? Is that that “naked” with obedience means openness while “naked” without obedience means we find clever ways to cover it up? Thus, the fig leaves?
If “tov” implies transparency, as David suggests, then “ra'” must mean hidden. This gets interesting when you think that after eating the fruit, Adam and Eve tried to hide with fig leaves. Thus, that was the result of the knowledge of evil.
Does anyone have thoughts as to why Eve’s eyes were opened only AFTER Adam ate from the fruit? One would think her eyes would open immediately after she ate . . .
All of your questions are treated in my book, Guardian ANgel. Please order it and read to your heart’s delight.
Skip
So if we are told to “cover the naked” (and I don’t run into many naked people) – it means that we should…?
I’d be very interested in fleshing this out.
That is an interesting and insight thought, Gabe. I’m going to explore that further.
One word: “WOW!”
I wish I knew Hebrew language so that I can read the Word of God in the original language and to thoroughly enjoy it, yes, even more than in English, or any other language that the Bible is translated to. Being a professional interpreter for almost 25 years now, I know the beauty, the magnificence, and the difference between the ORIGINAL work of art and translated work.
Ok, you said it, “I wish I knew Hebrew language so that I can read the Word of God in the original language…”
Here is ONE possibility to help you do just that – http://eteacherbiblical.com
I am learning Hebrew. I just had a class this afternoon on my computer with a live instructor from Israel. It is great! It is challenging because it is different but very doable.
Check it out. Jump in. Ride the Hebrew in to deeper understanding of His Word.
You’re invited.
I just ordered your book GUARDIAN ANGEL.
I know there is more to me as female spiritually than what I have understood and my role in marriage .
I’ve been a believer since age 6 and have had many failures in my life ?and now at age 58 I NEED to understand my role as female in marriage and in relationship to God .
The church has failed in these areas of understanding marriage …thus the divorce rate among saints !
I won’t knowledge and understanding because my heart is crying to know !