Psychological Paradigms
Be exalted, O God, above the heavens! Let your glory be over all the earth! Psalm 57:5 ESV
Be exalted – All contemporary models of psychological practice are based on a Greek paradigm of cause and effect. Basically, they all seek to understand causes in order to alter effects. From pharmacology to Freudian analysis, the underlying commitment is to rational (however that may be defined), cognitive exploration of causal connections with the unjustified presupposition that determining and controlling causes will result in different consequences. But just like the attack of Thomas Kuhn on the naïve model of scientific development, this paradigm stands or falls on the truth of the connection between cause and effect in the world of psychology. If psychological practice is to succeed, there must be a direct relationship between my antecedent causes and my subsequent effects. Otherwise, there is no point in examining these causes. I might as well simply treat the symptoms. In fact, in some sense, psychological pharmacology has already conceded to this solution although it continues to support the paradigm that psychological problems can be solved by causal alterations.
The Jewish paradigm is radically different. The Jewish paradigm presupposes, based on revelation, that God alone determines the relationship between moral and ethical choices and the subsequent effects. In other words, there is no direct relationship. The relationship, if it exists at all, is a function of divine connections, not automatic causal ones. For example, if I cut my hand with a knife, my hand bleeds. This is a direct causal connection. If I cut my hand with a knife and it did not bleed, I would be very concerned. This direct causal connection is why I do not cut out my heart when I am feeling forsaken. The direct causal connection would lead immediately to death.
But there is no apparent direct causal connection between disobeying Torah and immediate consequences, nor is there for obeying Torah, for that matter. If I eat pork, I do not instantly get sick or die. If I misuse God’s name, I am not immediately struck by lightening. In the absence of this direct causal connection, I draw the false (and ultimately tragic) conclusion that these actions have no consequence. Therefore, I can disregard them as irrelevant to my behavioral choices. The fact that you insist that they have “eternal” consequences is unimportant because I see no necessity to consider what is not causally connected now. And your argument presupposes a paradigm that neither psychology nor society acknowledges.
Hebraic counseling models are not based on the accepted paradigm of cause and effect. They are based on the idea that connections depend entirely on God’s perspective. Therefore, it is of little value to examine why I behave in certain ways in an effort to alter my behavior. What matters in a world where the consequences of my actions are determined by God, and not by causality, is how I behave. Therefore, counseling practice under this paradigm is directional. Do this! Do not do that! It ultimately doesn’t matter why I do this or that nor does it matter how I feel about doing this or that. What matters is whether or not I do it. You might consider Yeshua’s parable of the two sons asked to work in the field. God makes the consequence connection according to His determination, not according to my explanation or rational insight, or according to the system of causality employed in the Greek paradigm. In the Hebraic world, it does not follow that if I revisit the injuries of my past and come to terms with them, my psychological outlook toward others will improve. It does follow that if I forgive and bless those who harmed me, God will be glorified. What happens to me, however, is up to Him. I act out of duty, not personal benefit. In the Hebraic model, my first concern is repaying the debt I owe to God because my very existence is His gift and that is repaid by faithful loyalty to His instructions regardless of the actual or expected outcome. In the Hebraic model, psychological health is a function of my obedience to God, not a function of my inner state of mind.
In Hebrew thought, my psychological state of mind is a function of my willingness to exalt the name of God through my behavior, and in most cases, this requires both of the great commandments. I am what I do. And when my doing is focused on blessing others, God makes the connections that nourish my soul.
Topical Index: psychology, exalt, rum, paradigm, Psalm 57:5
Do we celebrate our heroes because of their sacrifice and sense of duty, or because of the benefits of a secured and mostly uninterrupted lifestyle? The generation that experienced first-hand the ten plagues, the parting of the Reed Sea, and the majesty of Sinai were promised entrance to the Land and assured victory over their enemies. Still, at the appointed time they did not believe that the LORD is Sovereign and refused to follow His instructions. If that was not enough, later they made matters worse by attempting to take the Land and defeat the enemy on their own. One day they could not conceive that the cause was big enough to provide the desired effect, and the next they were deceived into thinking they could trust that the nobility of the cause would bring the desired effect. Why did God reverse His promises for that generation? Because, fundamentally, they viewed God as one among many and not as the One and only. The role of a biblical counselor is much the same as Abraham and Sarah, to represent the message of monotheism at the crossroads of life.
“In Hebrew thought, my psychological state of mind is a function of my willingness to exalt the name of God through my behavior”
Skip, could you explain what you mean by “Hebrew” thought? Are you talking about ancient Hebrew days? Since so very many Israelites today do not serve YHVH, where does that leave their belief about their psychological state of mind?
Skip,
Your post today is a “home run”, very well articulated. I wish I could send an email blast of the post to every psychologist and every psychiatrist in the nation. That would be fun! But I am cynical enough to know that it would mostly go right over their heads. It takes the Spirit to understand what you are saying but not to worry, that day is coming, maybe even sooner than many of us think when everyone will understand. Isaiah tells us that during the Millennial reign of Messiah:
“for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of YHVH as the waters cover the sea.” (Is 11:9)
At that point the secular psychologists will all be out of business!
. . . . and. . .O Lord, let THY exaltation equally draw the attention of the whole earth, by showing Thyself to be Almighty GOD, that sits in the heavens, and are higher than they, by saving me (and you), and disappointing our enemies; that I, and those that are with me/us, may magnify the Lord and exalt His Name together.
O Lord, deliverance is always Divine and connected with Your glory!
Often on my tongue is the publican’s prayer; ‘Be merciful unto me, O God, be merciful unto me: for my soul trusts in Thee. Yea, in the shadow of thy wings will I make my refuge until these calamities and wickedness be past.’
I will cry unto God most High. Unto God that performs all things for me. God delivers and accomplishes for His saints whatever is good for them.
The gradual process of triumphal confidence begins, but with lingering echo from the strophe of complaint. Our enemy is still at work, still plotting against all who belong to God, still seeking to harm and cause mischief; but the efforts made are in vain. They only bring the enemy himself into trouble, and cause the writer–who believes in God’s mercy–to pour forth a song of joy.
Awake, psaltery and harp; awake and celebrate, use my voice and my musical powers, which have slumbered while I was in trouble. I myself will awaken the new dawn by singing praises to my Saviour. I will sing about You among the nations for my joy is too great to be kept quiet in my own heart.
For Thy mercy is great unto the heavens, and Thy Truth reaches to the clouds.
Christ our Refuge,– His arms are open wide day and night to run into and be safe.
Any one may flee there — the stranger as well as the Israelite
It was a good study to use the verses provided over the last few days, lassoing them together.
In the Hebraic model, psychological health is a function of my obedience to God, not a function of my inner state of mind.
Hi Skip,
The sentence above does not make sense to me
In common sense terms, state of mind would seem to be a reflection of one’s mental health
If you are holy, happy, and healthy you have a peaceful state of mind
But in the Hebrew worldview
The Heroes such Job, David, and Jesus go through extreme mental torment
Hell itself could not be worse
“mental torment”
Hmmm
Just looking at the two words above
Funny how English words are constructed
If we look closely
We find the word “men” in both words
In “mental” we also find a T and an L (a Cross and an Ox-goad in Hebrew)
Obviously, the goad and the cross are both associated with “pain
In “torment” we find a double Cross and “or”
or: to be or become light
Original Word: אוֹר
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: or
Phonetic Spelling: (ore)
Short Definition: shine
“But just like the attack of Thomas Kuhn on the naïve model of scientific development, this paradigm stands or falls on the truth of the connection between cause and effect in the world of psychology.”
Hmmm
When I was in college over 40 years ago, the atheist philosopher Jean Paul Sartre was my favorite
As I recall, he speaks of an “Original Choice” that we make that determines what options we have
For example. we are free to choose to live in the Greek or Hebrew paradigm
I was always very attracted to his French existentialism, and to the existentialist psychologists
Who tended to be German Jews
I’m not sure if I can state this correctly, but his philosophical approach focuses on the ontological
Rather than on the theological level of existence and interpretation
At this level, we are not determined by God
Rather we are free to choose to love our neighbor or not
SUMMARY
1. EXISTENCE PRECEDES ESSENCE. “Freedom is existence, and in it existence precedes essence.” This means that what we do, how we act in our life, determines our apparent “qualities.” It is not that someone tells the truth because she is honest, but rather she defines herself as honest by telling the truth again and again.
I am a professor in a way different than the way I am six feet tall, or the way a table is a table. The table simply is; I exist by defining myself in the world at each moment.
2. SUBJECT RATHER THAN OBJECT. Humans are not objects to be used by God or a government or corporation or society. Nor we to be “adjusted” or molded into roles –to be only a waiter or a conductor or a mother or worker. We must look deeper than our roles and find ourselves.
3. FREEDOM is the central and unique potentiality which constitutes us as human. Sartre rejects determinism, saying that it is our choice how we respond to determining tendencies.
4. CHOICE. I am my choices. I cannot not choose. If I do not choose, that is still a choice. If faced with inevitable circumstances, we still choose how we are in those circumstances.
For me the most important points can be found in Sartre’s first major work, Being and Nothingness
We have being in this world and God is Nothingness
Hell is other people
And the only opportunity we have to control our destiny is in the “here and now”
Michael, Without wanting to open a theological can of worms or to get into a philosophical discussion with someone who quotes Sartre like he was an old college roommate, how in the (Biblical) world can you believe God is nothingness? Is that the revelation He made regarding Himself to Moses on Mount Sinai? Given the choice between what YHWH reveled in Torah about His own nature, character and essence verses what a French existential philosopher says about Him I think I’ll stick with revelation rather than speculation. Michael too.
“His own nature, character and essence verses”
Hi Michael and Arnella
In my view, the “burning bush” is a visible sign through which God speaks
My understanding is that the true essence of the Hebrew G-d is so transcendent
That it cannot be described and cannot interact directly with the universe
In Jewish mysticism, “emanations” from G-d’s essence can interact with the universe
These emanations are referred to as Sefirot (se-fee-ROHT)
As an undergraduate I was strongly influenced by Viktor Emil Frankl, M.D., Ph.D
Frankl was an Austrian neurologist, psychiatrist, and Holocaust survivor
Frankl was the founder of logotherapy, which is a form of existential analysis
The “Third Viennese School of Psychotherapy”.
His best-selling book Man’s Search for Meaning was one of my favorite’s
It was published under a different title in 1959: From Death-Camp to Existentialism
Then again as Say “Yes” to Life: A Psychologist Experiences the Concentration Camp
It chronicles his experiences as a concentration camp inmate
Which led him to discover the importance of finding meaning in all forms of existence
Even the most sordid ones, and thus, a reason to continue living
Frankl became one of the key figures in existential therapy
And a prominent source of inspiration for humanistic psychologists
For me, Frankl served as a kind of transitional figure from Freud, Marx, and Sartre
To the Hebrew worldview of Skip Moen
For me they are all rather tightly connected
“In the Hebraic world, it does not follow that if I revisit the injuries of my past and come to terms with them, my psychological outlook toward others will improve. It does follow that if I forgive and bless those who harmed me, God will be glorified.”
Absolutely true! On the contrary, bringing up the past enforces remembrance of bitterness and hurts, that could be due to misunderstandings or circumstantial.
The willingness to forgive regardless who is at fault, is of the highest order, thus lifting up YHWH ‘s Presence in our lives.
“In the Hebraic model, psychological health is a function of my obedience to God, not a function of my inner state of mind.” Amein.
It has nothing to do with what my thoughts were/are, or if I understand or not. It is simply to OBEY
what HE says/commands in His Word. I do not need to fully understand the ‘Whys’, nor the need to see what the consequences will be if/when I disobey(!)
“But there is no apparent direct causal connection between disobeying Torah and immediate consequences, nor is there for obeying Torah, for that matter.”
Therefore, believers can ignore the consequences due to non swift judgement like in the Tanakh days, forgetting that ABBA is with-holding judgement “until the fullness of the Gentiles be come in” Rom 11:25
John in the post above says, it is a “home run”. Indeed!
It is thought provoking as Skip meant it to be 🙂
Hello from Brazil, Skip!
Amazing words! These last two studies about psychology made me really reflect about what it is important when we are working with people: GOD!
I am studying psychology at college and besides being in contact with so many concepts and theoretical lines, I always say to my colleagues (whom believe in God) that “I feel like the right theory does not exist yet”. Most of everything we see at the classroom just doesn’t fit with what we know about the Bible and God Himself. Actually it is a challenge to stay firm in faith being attacked almost everyday with concepts that try to disrupt with everything such as faith and the “idea” of God.
The very best tool to help others has been already created, and we can find it transcript in the Bible. Is there anything more powerful than the Word?
The right path is not trying to find God among all theories and choose one who fits better, but finding psychology – in a non greek way- IN GOD & through what He taught us in the Bible.
I think Jesus was an excellent psychologist, by the way.
May Hashem bless you & your family. Keep writing!!
Shalom