Avoid Israel’s Mistakes

For I do not want you to be unaware, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud and all passed through the sea; and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea;  1 Corinthians 10:1-2  NASB

Into – If you read these verses in the electronic version of the NASB, you will find them under the column caption, “Avoid Israel’s Mistakes.”  I suppose it’s possible to summarize Paul’s list of events in the wilderness as Israel’s mistakes, but that seems to overlook Paul’s consistent phrase “as some of them did” (v. 8-10).  In other words, the far more appropriate caption for this section seems to me to be what Paul actually says in verse 14, “Flee idolatry.”  To suggest that Israel (that is, all of Israel) made these mistakes actually ignores what Paul writes.  Furthermore, Paul is writing to Gentiles who have become believers and their issue is not the disobedience of some of Israel in the wilderness.  Their issue is idolatry.  Israel’s experiences with God in the wilderness are only parallels because idolatry is the common thread.  In fact, Paul’s opening remark makes it clear that these examples of disobedience are atypical.  We can see this by paying attention to the preposition “into” (eis).

The Greek preposition eis is about location.  In theological usage in the apostolic writings, eis often describes the transposition of the believer from a world of pagan affiliation to the world of the Way, a commitment to live according to the teachings of the Messiah.  Therefore, eis is connected to salvation and the choice to change direction and follow a new path.  Gentiles would certainly understand this spatial connotation since even Greek pagan religions associated eis with the connection between the divine and earthly realms.  So Paul uses a preposition that has significant religious association in both the Gentile and Jewish worlds.  But notice what Paul connects with this preposition.  Israel was baptized into Moses.  Amplifying the spatial transposition of the preposition, Paul is saying that Israel was transported into the world of Moses.  What world was that?  There can be only one summary answer: Torah.  Moses, the great prophet of Torah, provides Israel with its unique direction for the Way.  Moses’ relationship with God is entirely Torah based.  No other prophet of Israel attains the position of Moses.  Without Moses, Israel has no extraordinary relationship with the Kingdom and the King.  For all intents and purposes, Moses’ revelation brings the nation of Israel into existence.  To be baptized into Moses is the equivalent of saying what Heschel notes:  “A Jew without Torah is obsolete.”

Paul uses this metaphor to call Gentiles into faith.  What faith is that?  Every example Paul cites in the litany of those whom God punished were Israelites who rejected the full implications of Torah.  Paul is not suggesting that Jews were baptized into Torah but Gentiles are baptized into some other kingdom.  To be in the Kingdom is to be baptized into Moses.  The revelation of Moses remains the constitution of the Kingdom.  Just as Israel became a nation when it adopted Torah, so Gentiles become part of the same Kingdom with the same action.  The method changes.  The constitution does not.

Topical Index:  into, eis, Torah, Moses, baptism, 1 Corinthians 10:1-2

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cheryl

How does the method change?

Barbara Schultz

That was an excellent read, and I deeply appreciate the insight. It makes lots of sense. However, it leaves me with further questions.
Hebrews 7:11,12 reads that there was still need for another priest to come, in the order of Melchizedek in my version, not in the order of Aaron. It goes on further to read that where there is a change of the priesthood, there must also be a change of the law.

I am wondering how the concept presented by that passage would relate to baptism into Torah? I am also wondering what sort of change in the law might be implied? If you have understanding related to reconciliation of the passage with the concept of Yeshuah as “living Torah”, I would be greatly interested.

Laurita Hayes

Could not we say the Christian corollary to this would be the recognition, when someone transfers from one denomination, say, to another, that their prior baptism into the faith often continues to be recognized, and the only instruction then would be to follow the new doctrine? The few exceptions that I think I have seen to this would be if the transfer is into a denomination (really dislike this word!) that teaches immersion, say, and the proselyte had previously just been sprinkled, or if the new congregation believed that a baptism included being baptized INTO a particular body of believers.

it’s funny, but every time I read this verse it reminds me of a certain Roman emperor who marched his whole army through the Tiber(?) in a mass forced ‘conversion’ to Christianity. And we know the devil is a copy cat….. (sorry, cats)

Ester

True, Laurita, folks leave one ‘denomination’ into another, and then having to follow certain new rules/doctrine.
It is zeal without Torah knowledge.
Shalom, shalom.