From Genesis to Proverbs to John (1)
The Lord God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man. Genesis 2:22 NASB
Fashioned ā The Bible is a giant connect-the-dots puzzle. Understanding a passage as a stand-alone text often does not capture the depth of the words or the context. We are required to be more imaginative, pulling together pieces of similar wording and stories in order to see the grand picture. With this in mind, letās explore a possible set of connections that just might shed some light on particularly troublesome doctrines.
First, a note about the use of hokma.
Wisdom is an inexact term that is commonly used to refer to knowledge regarding life that God has built into the infrastructure of the natural and social worlds, the search for those understandings in everyday experience, and the transmission of the results of that search. God has created wisdom in the first place and continues to mediate Godās will and way in and through that reality; at the same time, wisdom functions as a creature allowed to be itself apart from specific divine management. As such a reality, the wisdom embedded in the world makes itself available to human beings; wisdom has a certain drawing power, but the process of human discovery and discernment is crucial for the proper shaping of human life. The gathering and transmission of wisdom is an intellectual exercise and accumulation of knowledge not simply for its own sake but to enable the best human life possible in Godās world, both individual and communal. The heart of wisdom is what is done with that knowledge in the daily round, the discernment of the appropriate relationship between what individuals have come to know and how they live.[1]
Fretheim begins connecting the dots by noting that āLifeās experiences are not objectified in wisdom or made into philosophical or abstract principles but have to do with lifeās specific, concrete relationships and contingent events.ā[2] Hebrew reality is tangible reality. It is made up of descriptions of the way the world actually works, not explanations of the way a system of thought says that world should work. Therefore, when Hebrew describes the actual relationships of men and women in this world and their connection to God, the descriptions are not theological propositions but stories, legends and cultural assumptions. This means that the description of the formation of the woman in Genesis 2 can be elaborated by reading it from the perspective of the material in Proverbs 8. The personification of Wisdom as a woman elaborates what was intended in the relationship established by God in the formation of the human woman. Notice how Fretheim describes the role and relation of Wisdom.
āThe fundamental characteristic of this creational reality is relatedness; it is foundational to the way in which the world works. . . . In other words, there is something basic about the very structures of creationāsocial as well as cosmicāthat can be properly understood only in relational terms, indeed, in personal terms. In and through a discernment of the many and various interrelationships that God has built into the created order, one may be more closely attuned to Godās will for that world and act accordingly.ā[3]
āWoman Wisdom, in effect, is the āglueā that holds everything together in a stable and harmonious whole.ā[4]
If we apply this articulation of the Genesis 2 account, we notice immediately that the woman is designed for a role that a man cannot play, that is, providing the fabric of relatedness that allows both male and female to become Godās image. Man may be tasked with the role of caretaker and developer in the divinely initiated creative process, but it is woman who makes this possible by bringing the priority of relationship to the foreground. It is through her that the deepest element of Godās creation is birthed, that is, the interconnectedness of things. Perhaps this is why the rabbis suggest that a woman is not obligated to pray while a man is obligated. A woman has a natural, God-given connectedness to spiritual matters and instinctively expresses prayer while a man must be disciplined to pray since it is not inherent in his makeup.
When the text uses the Hebrew verb bana (to build), it suggests conscious design as if the builder took time to deliberately plan and then execute the project. This is quite different than the description of the man in the earlier verses. The man is āformedā (yatsar) with an emphasis on shaping something (as with clay). As the divine potter, God shapes the man, but when it comes to the woman, a more deliberate and contemplative project is underway. The idea of building the woman connects us to the description of the intimate, innate relationship between God and Woman Wisdom. Perhaps the description in Proverbs 8 helps us fill in exactly what God was building when He created a physical representation of this spiritual relationship. Fretheimās analysis of Woman Wisdom offers tantalizing views of what might lie behind the verb bana.
How would your view of the role of woman change if these connections were true?
Oh yes, and by the way, there is another interesting connection in Johnās gospel, as we will see.
Topical Index: woman, bana, to build, wisdom, Proverbs 8, Genesis 2:22
[1] Terrence Fretheim, God and World in the Old Testament: A Relational Theology of Creation, p. 199.
[2] Ibid., p. 203.
[3] Terrence Fretheim, God and World in the Old Testament: A Relational Theology of Creation, p. 209.
[4] Ibid., p. 207.
In your book, Guardian Angel, you define Ć”sah and baraā in Godās design of the woman. In this TW it is bana. A little confused.
In terms of relatedness, a woman is wired for this more so than a man. Would this allow the man to not take responsibility for his insensitivity?
This could be an interesting way to understand Godās message for mankind in the book with more questions than answers. Then again one could make connection of everything in the bible to imply something elseā¦ Spiritualisation some call it.
Consider the creation of male and femaleā¦ Spiritual birth into apostle and prophet for will and wisdom of Godā¦ The anointed Christ.
Such an approach may just make Godās wisdom and calling for us solely reliant on how open mindedly we approach the records instead of single minded Christā¦
Just a thought. I have gone such a route for 45 years which just resulted in make belief worshipping and praise.
Or maybe I just did the incorrect exegesis or connectionā¦
I posted but for some reason it didnāt show up. So I donāt recognize these verbs as the one in your book, Guardian Angel. āasah and baraā
And my other question was if women are the relationship keepers, does this let the man off the hook in some ways. Since he could say his lack of an emotional response is not his fault.
Shabbat Shalom
Certainly doesnāt let the man āoff the hookā in any way since he has direct responsibilities to YHVH too. As for the verbs, I am in Split, Croatia, so checking on the text of Guardian Angel will have to wait a bit. Sorry.
Thanks for the response. Yes, a man is responsible to God, but that doesnāt mean he wouldnāt try to duck out of his responsibility or accountability to the woman. Just a thought.
I knew someone whoās mother was from Crostia. I would love to see this country as I heard it was a very beautiful and charming place. ?
Sorry spell check is irritating. From Croatia.
I look forward to hearing more on this.
Iām so happy to be a woman and to know I as a woman am the pinnacle of Godās creation. ?
We know that married couples have certain relationships with their spouses as God designed. He has certainly created woman with an interconnectedness that man does not seem to have. Itās not just a maternal thing. We often focus so much on married couples but no one seems to talk about normal non-sexual fraternal relationships that men and women can have with each other in which womenās interconnectedness, wisdom, and discernment can come into play. Men are often the leaders who rarely carefully listen to what their spiritual sisters have to say. I donāt blame them for this; I think itās part of being a man. Weāre just created differently. We definitely have to exert caution to avoid inappropriate relationships, but women often have much insight into the emotions people in the Scriptures experienced that can be shared with their brothers.
I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.
ļ»æ×× ×Öµ×¢×Ö¹×Öø× × Ö“×”Ö¼Ö·×Ö°×ŖÖ¼Ö“× ×Öµ×ØÖ¹××©× ×֓קַּ×Ö°×Öµ× ×Öø×Øֶׄ.
Yes, Wisdom was set up, × Ö“×”Ö¼Ö·×Ö°×ŖÖ¼Ö“× (nissakhti), āI was appointedā, from the beginning, and that, perhaps was THE Word meant in Genesis 1
(I had mentioned this before in another previous TW comment)
V 22 Hashem made me as the beginning of His way, the first of His works of old.
ļ»æ×× ×Ö°××Öø× ×§Öø× Öø× Ö“× ×ØÖµ×ש×Ö“××Ŗ ×Ö¼Ö·×ØÖ°×Ö¼×Ö¹ קֶ×Ö¶× ×֓פְעÖø×Öø×× ×Öµ×Öø×.
YHWH created the world with/in Wisdom, of course! Wisdom was in the beginning, With YHWH, and Wisdom IS God interconnected!
Man/Adam was ××Öŗצֵ×Ø yatsar -formed; Woman/ Chawah ×Ö¼Öø× Öø× banah / built, made. I see a difference here. Building is more detailed, specified?
Shaped versus fashionedā¦ We build empires on fashioning for woman, but not by fashions for menā¦ Not the fashion God intended but we enjoy it none the lessā¦
And Yeshua was born from an undefiled virginā¦ Not just any woman.
What does this connection say about wisdom?