Taking Care of Business
Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy; six days you shall labor and do all your work; and the seventh day is a sabbath to YHVH your God; you shall not do any work, . . . Exodus 20:8-10 J. Green translation
Work – Work/worship/serve is the combination of meanings associated with the Hebrew word avad. But this isn’t the word used in the fourth commandment. The word used in this commandment is melakah, a word that means “work, occupation, business, workmanship or service.” Six days you shall take care of business, but not on the seventh day. Seems clear enough, right? Well, maybe not.
As an interesting aside, we might notice that melakah has the same assumed root as the word mal’ak and mal’ak is used not only for messenger but also for angel (all those who carry a message). Does this suggest that work is also a form of message-bearing?
TWOT[1] distinguishes melakah (work) from ‘amal and yaga’ (toil). Work emphasizes effort that involves skill and benefits, as opposed to toil which it seen as burdensome labor. Melakah describes not only the effort but the results. This commandment prohibits three things on the Sabbath: what we do that is associated with skill, what we do that provides benefits and what we do that could involve saying something about us to the watching world that would dishonor God.
With this broad definition, the next obvious question is, “What are those kinds of things?” The Bible specifically mentions nine activities. Only nine. But Judaism expanded these nine to 39 classifications and from there to hundreds of rulings on particulars in works like the Tractate Shabbat. Of course, there were good motivations behind these expansions. No one wanted to accidently violate a commandment so everyone wanted to know the details. These details are included in the oral Torah, eventually written down in rabbinic material. This process tells us something about the culture we encounter when we read the Bible, particularly the New Testament.
Martin Hengel’s study of the influence of Hellenism on Judaism contains this remarkable statement: “From about the middle of the third century BC all Judaism must really be designated as ‘Hellenistic Judaism’ in the strict sense, and a better differentiation could be made between the Greek-speaking Judaism of the Western Diaspora and the Aramaic/Hebrew-speaking Judaism of Palestine and Babylonia.”[2] Hengel continues, “The Jews were the only people of the East to enter into deliberate competition with the Greek view of the world and of history, . . . after 70AD they suddenly broke off from giving accounts of their history and concentrated entirely on developing fundamentally ahistorical halacha and haggada . . .”[3] The destruction of the second temple precipitated this break but the foundation for it was laid hundreds of years earlier in the rise of rabbinic theology. An example of Hegel’s observation can be seen in the dozens of rulings regarding the proper application of melakah. Judaism in the time of Yeshua was already on its way toward this concentration of halacha and haggadah. It is simply impossible to read the texts of the New Testament without understanding this background.
Judaism today is not the same faith that we find in the older books of the Tanakh. It has been transformed since the destruction of the Temple. That doesn’t mean we cannot learn a great deal from Jewish insights and investigation, but it does mean that we have to probe as best we can behind the cultural transformation that occurred after the fourth century BC in Israel. In other words, we have to look toward the cultures of the ancient Near-East (like Mesopotamia, Babylon and Egypt) if we are going to understand words like melakah as they were understood by the chosen ones who stood before YHVH at Sinai.
We have a lot to learn, don’t we?
Topical Index: Sabbath, work, melakah, Judaism, halacha, Exodus 20:8-10
[1] The Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, eds. Archer, Waltke, Harris
[2] Martin Hengel, Judaism and Hellenism, p. 104.
[3] Ibid., p. 100.
Let’s go!
Yeshua came to set us straight because we already were getting it so wrong. He was NOT ‘breaking’ the Sabbath, ever, for He never did disobey any Torah, but He did, time and time again, go up against these burdensome STRAYINGS from the Torah. We are cautioned right in the text not to add or subtract from that original encounter with the text, but we all have strayed. Keeping Shabbat is simple. The devil is to be found in the details of complication.
Good morning Miss Hayes. Would I be accurate in saying that when yeshua did things such as healing on the Sabbath and others in that category. We are told to follow the spirit of the letter is this what you mean?
That is the way I read it. Helping the sick and helpless and feeding the hungry, etc. is always sacred work.
As in the parable of the good Samaritan, who fulfills “You shall love YHWH your elohim with all of your heart, soul, and strength (Heb. Modecha, your stuff, substance, abundance.)
The devil, as in ha-satan, the adversary in Hebrew, Laurita?
Ha-satan like the yetzer ha’ra is to be overcomed by us though both its are for our benefit, a challenge to awaken our spirits to the awareness of the strength /truth we possess.
Shalom!
Here is the questions concerning the Sabbath…
Keep it holy – When is something Holy? Scriptural correct as you say from 70AD there may have been a change when in fact the change already occurred when the tribes were scattered, so a lot of different views may be deemed holy, the question is what does the original scripts by Moses deem to be holy… As that would be added ad Laurita rightly reminds.
Not work? This sounds like trade and not like catering for family feeding etc. that sounds like something added due to rabbinic views added after the first instruction.
Can we maybe strip away all the rabbinic literature and scholars comments and say exactly what was recorded for the Sabbath… Just to ensure we are doing what YHVH desires and not what we think he desires…
(Do not answer just consider that how we currently consider Torah requirements for Sabbath may not be.)
Remember that the apostles appointed deacons to serve the elderly during Sabbath assemblies…
From the NT
“Therefore do not let anyone judge you . . . with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ” (Colossians 2:16-17). And Jesus, when rebuked by the Pharisees for plucking grain from a field on the Sabbath, criticized those who made a fetish of Sabbath observance, insisting, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath” (Mark 2:27).
What is the correct view then on Col 2 as we have already discussed Mark 2 in earlier posts?
Search my web site for the verse and you will see that the Christian church, by ignoring the audience, reads it backwards.
Skip
I agree that we take the word “mere” out of the equation and we may still read a remarkable proclamation:
shadow of what is to come…
A shadow for me implies something in the past that is overshadowed by new principles. Guidelines which are the bones and sinew of the gift of Christ may never be broken… I do not claim the Torah is not important it is the foundation for faith. But we must build on it not keep relaying the foundation…
Not everyone reads the bible backwards our paradigm is today.
If we manifest the desires of God as you have reiterated throughout other blogs Micah 6, Ps 119, Prov 3, Ezekiel 31, Matt 6, John 6 and Acts 15… Which of the 613 laws are we not following, we may just as well be fulfilling everyone without actually considering them.
If I think; wait tomorrow is another day, well neither will Torah help shape anything.
Remember the Torah is our knowledge and wisdom only 1/2 of the Christ gift manifestation, Christ is the power and wisdom. How about reflecting on my paradigm… I need both to show NT faith and only Torah to show OT faith.
Unless I am reading the basic instruction before leaving earth wrong.
Here’s something to consider Seeker, if we look at melakah (work) as a picture we come up with doing something that comes out of the intent to advance/initiate our interests, which is what we do when we work, and is what an angel/ messenger is, and btw, isn’t that what God did in the beginning, as all the things that were created and formed is a reflection ans a message of who God is and how His kingdom operates.
If it helps at all this is for everyone it is a matter of the heart I think it’s Cavanaugh something like that in Hebrew It’s All About Love
Robert
Thank you,
I agree work is to achieve an outcome, as for angels they are all spirits sent to serve God’s purpose…
I would dare to add; Manifesting God’s will and kingdom is not work but serving or giving love or baring the cross of Christ.
A reflection is not a shadow… A reflection is a temporary image of. While a shadow is proof of a light added to the equation.
This creation reflects perfect harmony, focused repair or maintenance, unconditional commitment. Would this then be what we need to achieve by following the principles in the bible?
I agree with your statement, however I was focusing a little closer on the “functionality” of the term malach and what it shows us when stripped of opinions and alterations. It still may leave us with questions because eating is to aquire a benefit towards oneself but it’s not a restricted activity on the sabbath. ? Even so, I think we can determine the restrictions and the intent of those by examining it this way.
Thank you, Robert
I read something on the Sabbath Truth website that says something like the view of work includes preparing meals as that is for benefit, but that this is an open interpretation which may differ from household to household and that Jesus is not the Sabbath sacrifice but Sabbath lifestyle of sacrifice for helping others…
I have been inclined to interpret malakah as “business as usual.” Am I attending to Shabbat with a business-as-usual attitude? Meet-n-greet, liturgy, song and dance, sermon, oneg, see you when we do it all again next Shabbat? Am I just trampling the courts? The heavenly response to that attitude is “Shut the temple doors and put out the fire under the altar, I’m sick of your New Moons and Sabbaths!”
And I am guilty, as charged.
We do have A LOT to learn indeed. Thank you Skip for digging, studying, searching, wrestling, and sharing what you learn with us. A word at a time, line upon line…This is not an easy road to choose. The more I learn, I realize what courage it must have taken to do what you are doing. THANKS!!
I am pretty new to this. It seems this should reflect tha character of YHVH. Hased may be the filter that ‘work’ should be decided???
God suppose to make things understandable. The bible is difficult to understand. Many understand it differently. There are many contradictions throughout the bible. My opinion. The bible can be discussed until we go to heaven. We never understand God’s way and yet He has given us choice. I don’t understand.