Read It Again
For God so loved the world . . . John 3:16 NASB
World – What a shame that we have strayed so far from the rich spectrum of meanings associated with the Greek word cosmos. Our English translation, “world,” limits our appreciation of John’s vocabulary by truncating nearly all of the nuances that would have been evident to the original audience. Perhaps we need to recapture those nuances and read this verse again.
We start with the verb, kosmeo (cosmeo):
“This verb was used in classical Greek from the time of Homer. Its meanings derive from the basic sense of κόσμος, i.e., order or adornment. In the sense “to order” κοσμέω is a technical military term for the placing of a host or the ordering of combatants,”[1]
The noun, κόσμος (cosmos), covers a wide range:
- “That which is well assembled or constructed from individual constituents.”
- When the object of the building consists of individual men who are integrated into a whole, κόσμος is a term for the order between men.
- κόσμος is very common in the general sense of “order.”
- In so far as the concept of the beautiful is inseparable from that of the ordered, it is always implied in κόσμος and finds particular expression in the sense “adornment” (usually of women).
- κόσμος . . . The senses previously mentioned merge in that of the world (the cosmic order or system, the universe, also heaven). Here κόσμος becomes one of the most important terms in Greek philosophy. It has significance not merely in intellectual history but also in the history of ancient religion.[2]
If we read John’s comment as the original audience read it, we might hear something like this: “For God so loved the order of His creation, He was so enthralled with the adornment that the Creation provided Him, that He sent His son.” This helps us realize that John 3:16 is not just about us. It enlarges the role of the Messiah so that his task involves the entire creation. He is sent to reveal to us the full adornment of the Father in all of His handiwork. It means that the Messiah is the final statement of YHVH about our relationship with all YHVH has done. The original audience would have heard overtones of full integration into God’s purposes. They would have listened to the implied connection between beauty and purpose. And most importantly, they would recognize that God’s love extends to everything He made. In other words, the son did not come merely to “save” us, as popular billboards suggest. He came to re-order the entire creation. What God is after is recovery of the original in all of its aspects. Of course, that included men and women, but it doesn’t stop there. And neither should we. Saving souls is not the objective. Returning to the original order is.
My daughter, Rachel, remarked that “the least of these” must also include animals, oceans, streams, forests, beaches and everything else God made. She was quite disturbed to see people abusing stray dogs. “How can anyone say they love God and treat His creatures like that?” cosmos is a very big term. It requires a very big shift in our thinking and our behavior. Perhaps Heschel points us in the right direction:
We do not confess our belief in God; we adore Him. We do not proclaim our belief in revelation; we utter our gratitude for it. We do not formulate the election of Israel; we sing it. Thus our liturgy is no mere memorial to the past; it is an act of participating in Israel’s bearing witness to the unity, uniqueness, love and judgment of God. It is an act of joy.[3]
Topical Index: cosmos, world, John 3:16
An additional note: Hebrew has no word for “universe.” Instead, it used the terms “heaven and earth.” But Jewish writers influenced by Hellenism used the word cosmos and imported it into rabbinic material. “Hence it is only in the final writings of the LXX, which are Greek in their very conception, that κόσμος is found in the sense of “world.”[4]
This raises a question about Sasse’s statement, “In the NT κόσμος is never used in the sense ‘order,’ and it occurs for ‘adornment’ only once at 1 Pt. 3:3 of women.”[5] Perhaps Sasse reads cosmos in the New Testament as a Christian concept rather than a Jewish Greek one. If Judaism used cosmos as a substitute for “heaven and earth,” then the idea of order is clearly embedded in cosmos and since the New Testament Greek is Jewish Greek, it seems unlikely that cosmos in the New Testament never means order. It is more likely, it seems to me, that Sasse interprets cosmos in opposition of Gnosticism in the first century rather than recognizing the rabbinic background.
[1] Sasse, H. (1964–). κοσμέω, κόσμος, κόσμιος, κοσμικός. G. Kittel, G. W. Bromiley, & G. Friedrich (Eds.), Theological dictionary of the New Testament (electronic ed., Vol. 3, p. 867). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Abraham Heschel, Man’s Quest for God, pp. 82-83.
[4] Sasse, H. op. cit.
[5] Ibid.
“For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.” Luke 19:10
So Yeshua came to save the olam… the creation… the universe… the cosmos… the whole thing.
I have a question I have a question. Wouldn’t that be…” from the household of Israel ” ?
Sometimes we speak faster then we think .Or am I the one ( over- thinking )?
Hi Brett. Please consider the following:
“I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us. For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed. For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God. We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time. Not only so, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption to sonship, the redemption of our bodies. For in this hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is no hope at all. Who hopes for what they already have? But if we hope for what we do not yet have, we wait for it patiently.” Romans 8:18-25
So, is Israel the only “that” which was lost? Is humanity the only “that” which was lost?
In other words, is Israel the only one to be saved? Are we as humanity the only ones to be saved?
“creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom”
“the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time”
Saved from what into what? Surely from disorder back into order; back into connection with the whole. A holy people are whole people; reconnected to God, themselves and others. The love of God constrains us; it prevents us from experiencing disorder and decay; from succumbing to the forces of death. Even in the worst that life throws at redeemed people, there is an overriding purpose and joy that only life can provide, Even death is a triumph for the righteous, for all of it is one more opportunity to strike a blow at darkness. “We are more than conquerors”; we are called to be “repairers of the breach”; reconnectors of all with all.
All things were created to work together for the glory of God. In none of this do we see singular, isolationist separation. The world is fractured: redemption is what returns us back to the web of life, for life is never singular; it is a collective experience shared by all. The more connections we have, the more lively we are. The One Who is connected with all holds all of life in His hand, for the connections (love) IS that life.
Salvation is spelled connection. If you don’t want to be seen, needed, included, necessary, responsible for all in your own special sphere, then don’t seek salvation, for that is what you will be returned to.
God has designed His plan of restoration to begin with
a group effort. It works one on One.
And it follows a precise order. “For if, by the trespass of the one man,
death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive
God’s abundant provisions of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life
through the one man, Jesus Christ.”
When man is restored, the rest of the plan proceeds.
It starts with one, and it also ends with one… Many with the single mind and purpose are echad…IMHO
One must be careful not to import all known, or other known, nuances of a word into a given context. To do so is to potentially fall prey to an exegetical fallacy known as illegitimate totality transfer and/or unwarranted adoption of an expanded semantic field. Words only take on meaning in their respective contexts, of course. In this instance, one must begin at 3:14 and read through to verse 21.
The verb kosmeō is not found at all in the Gospel of John; therefore, one cannot legitimately use any of its nuances in John 3:16. Moreover, Koine Greek does not always retain the same meanings as Classical/Homeric Greek—or word meanings were expanded or contracted.
Missing in the definition for kosmos here is humanity in general, which is the appropriate definition in this particular context.
Coincidentally, a few years ago I read this verse afresh, and pondered whether kosmos in 3:16 referred to all creation, rather than merely humankind. While I wanted it to be the former, after careful reading I realized that the term is strictly for humankind here. This does not mean that God did not send the Son in order to begin the process of the restoration of all creation. He certainly did, as Paul notes (e.g. Romans 8).
For the juxtaposition of kosmos as humankind and kosmos as the entire created order, see John 1:9-11. For a context in which kosmos means the entire created order, see John 17:5.
More food for thought: The light vs. darkness (and wickedness/truth) dichotomy is also found in the Dead Sea Scrolls/Qumran.
I am not a scholar, but one thing that was drilled into me was context,context, context, not to just use one scripture and cherry pick it’s meaning. Craig I appreciate so much of what you write. I would add to totality transfer fallacy, foreign root fallacy ,root fallacy, etymological fallacy, sound fallacy. Not to pick on one group but I have seen so much error in these areas especially Hebrew roots movement. I have heard people ask why you are not emotional. From my point of view I am glad your not don’t feel my emotions need tweaking all the time nor is it of great advantage when studying the Bible. Again thanks Craig.
Skip said, “Saving souls is not the objective. Returning to the original order is.” Personally, I would like to see the word “only” inserted before objective, so it would read…”not the ONLY objective.” But…it’s importance should not be underestimated. What good is a restored world to someone who is condemned to spend eternity apart from God. The apostles spent a tremendous amount of time, energy, and effort, communicating the urgency of their message…coming to know and understand Yeshua (Salvation.) Yeshua himself commanded them to “Go into all the world and preach the Good News to all creation.” Mark 16:15
Rich Pease said, “When man is restored, the rest of the plan proceeds.” That, to me, sounds like a plan that would align with God’s desire for His creation.
Good point. Thanks
I totally agree Judi. If judgement begins in the house of YHVH then it would seem likely that restoration must begin in the same place. The whole point of the existence of Israel is to be the model for the nations to redeem and restore them. Then the cosmos
As God’s viceroys, that was always the plan. Model – redeem – restore. It’s not just the nation, but the call of every God-fearer.
Pet peeve – the passage in Mark to preach the Gospel is disputed. The GC is found in Matthew and says “Make Disciples…”
Evangelism is a means not the end. To paraphrase John Piper, Missions exists because Worship doesn’t.
True…but, it’s not easy to make a disciple without preaching and teaching the gospel to them.