But How?

So do not worry about tomorrow; for tomorrow will care for itself.  Each day has enough trouble of its own.  Matthew 6:34  NASB

Do not worry– Why does the biblical worldview seem so impossible to put into practical application?  How can Yeshua say that we should not worry about tomorrow, that we should constantly forgive, that we are not to calculate the requests and demands of others, that we are not to seek self-protection in the face of threat?  What could possibly justify such radical claims?  Why does this instruction seem so opposed to just plain common sense?

Some of these questions can be answered by an examination of the concept of freedom.  The differences between the biblical view of freedom and the common idea of freedom in our culture, and the implications for daily living, are dramatic.  These differences point toward a radically altered view of reality.

When we say that a man or woman is free, we usually imply something about the absence of restraint.  In politics, this will mean the absence of some dominating and determining factor that prevents self-rule.  In finances, this will mean the absence of economic suppression.  In the marketplace, it may mean the absence of discrimination in career choice or the absence of cultural and social restrictions on lifestyle.  All of these “negative” definitions view the world as a hostile, threatening place that, left to its own devices, seeks totalitarian control over the individual.  This control might come from government or from nature, but the result is essentially the same. The world wants sovereignty over me.  Freedom is my word for escaping this attempt to control me.

The Greeks recognized long ago that completely unrestrained freedom meant anarchy.  Men cannot live in a world where they are totally free to do whatever they wish whenever they wish. Social systems require constraints.  This is just as true today.  Just look at the chaos in societies run by warlords and gangs.  There is a dark side to freedom.  So freedom is constrained by law and law is the attempt of the group to bring into line those who would seek unrestrained existence at any cost.

This social-political restraint creates a more difficult problem. If society demands that I live under laws for the good of the whole, in what sense can I ever be truly free? Our Western culture has adopted the Greek answer:  to be truly free, you must be free from within.  A man or woman who finds inner freedom may live within the society governed by law, but his or her soul is not damaged by the restraint. Restraint is external.  It only becomes damaging when I allow the external circumstances of life to define my own inner world.  Wherever external threat becomes the basis of my own self-concern, I come under the control of something beside myself. But even though I may be threatened, I do not need to allow that threat to dominate my life.  In our world, genuine freedom is found in self-control. This is why prisoners emerge as victors over their captors.  This is why we recognize the indomitable spirit of Man rising from disaster, from despotism and from degradation.  We intuitively know that a self-possessed person can never be chained for even if the physical shackles are in place, the soul is still free to soar.

This Greek view of freedom is at the core of our worldview.  It is based on the belief that freedom is essentially the ability to control external threat and that freedom is achieved when external threat is eliminated, even if the elimination occurs only within the person through refusal to be dominated.  This view of freedom explains the human passion for self-determination.  In this world, Man is made for self-control and wherever that control is threatened, freedom is at stake.  Ultimately, this view of freedom must address the spirit of Man.  It must confront the inner prisons and break the bonds that hold men captive in their own minds.  For Man to be fully free, both the external and the internal worlds must coincide and both must be mastered.  In our world, freedom is control of what would otherwise constrain me.   This is at its core an issue of inner resolve.  It is ultimately a spiritual matter for in the end, freedom is a state of inner being, not simply the removal of external threats.  In the acquisition of freedom, our worldview often moves from the outside in.  We first attempt control of the circumstances of life in order to remove the threat to self-determination.  But ultimately, even external freedom is not enough.  Men must be free on the inside if they are to be ultimately self-determined.  This implies that the final basis of freedom is self-control.

Behind the gospel of control is the assumption that given the right decisions, the right technology, the right government, the right society, and the right information, control is possible.  Without this assumption, the entire structure supporting freedom falls.   It is at this point that the biblical view of freedom is radically different.  The Bible does not offer a variation of this concept of freedom.  It does not suggest a “spiritual” modification of the idea of controlling life.  The Bible confronts the fundamental assumption of the world’s idea of freedom head-on.  It simply says that the basic assumption about control is wrong.  From the Bible’s perspective, there is NO control. Men and women are NOT in charge of their lives.  They are not gods.  They do not reign over their circumstances no matter how much effort they put into trying to do so.  In the end, the biblical view is that God, and God alone [not in conflict with the “Devil”] is the sole authority.  His will prevails—always and everywhere, even if it takes a very long time from our point of view.  From the biblical perspective, the effort to bring about human freedom borders on idolatry.  What human beings are called to do is cooperate with God’s purposes and manage the results of that cooperative effort as God would manage them.  This means that contentment is a major element in the biblical view of human responsibility.  It is more important for me to learn acceptance of what God is doing than it is for me to put my efforts into bringing about a world under my control.

That doesn’t mean we must be passive.  God is not passive.  He expects us to restore His creation and fulfill His purposes with gusto, enormous effort and concentrated desire.  But we are workers on His behalf, not masters of our own destiny.  Freedom, in the Greek sense, is not only a myth, it is a costly mistake. Alignment with the Creator is the only definition of freedom in the Bible.

Topical Index:  freedom, worry, Matthew 6:34

Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jerry and Lisa

I would say the idea of mastering “being in control” is actually paramount for one to attain righteousness, peace, and joy this life, the longing of every soul, BUT it is control of our own yetzer hara, our “flesh”, sinful nature, and control of our yetzer haTov through the exercise of our mind and will over our emotions by and in keeping with, or one could say voluntarily surrendering to and “being controlled by” or “being a bond servant (prisoner) to” the Ruach HaKodesh, in accordance with the Word of Elohim, His Torah…..IN AND UNDER MESSIAH YESHUA, that is the way to “FREEDOM”.

Victor Frankl, a Jewish Holocaust survivor, discovered and developed a unique and good grasp of SOME of this understanding through his search for truth and finding a way to be “free” in the concentration camp in which he was “imprisoned”, and as a result he developed what is known as Logotherapy.

“Logotherapy, is based on an existential analysis focusing on Kierkegaard’s WILL TO MEANING as opposed to Adler’s Nietzschean doctrine of will to power or Freud’s will to pleasure. Rather than power or pleasure, logotherapy is founded upon the belief that it is the striving to find a meaning in one’s life that is the primary, most powerful motivating and driving force in humans. A short introduction to this system is given in Frankl’s most famous book, Man’s Search for Meaning, in which he outlines how his theories helped him to survive his Holocaust experience and how that experience further developed and reinforced his theories. Presently, there are a number of logotherapy institutes around the world.” [Wikipedia]

I recommend Mr. Frankl’s book, Man’s Search for Meaning.

Jerry and Lisa

Yes I know your views and I think you misunderstand mine and possibly because I have not explained them well enough. I consider emotions extremely important and do not believe they should be denied, repressed, minimized, etc.. I believe they should be felt, known, understood, expressed (sometimes only communicated about and not “vented”, sometimes otherwise). However, we should not be ruled by lies in our minds or the emotions that are based upon them. Does the Spirit of God ride upon all emotions of anger, hate, bitterness, rage, fear, jealousy, envy, lust, arrogant pride, etc.? I say no. And if I’m correct, then we must rule over them with our minds and will in keeping with and by the Spirit of God and His Word, His Torah in Messiah Yeshua. That is freedom! Otherwise it may be lawless carnality and emotionalism, etc..

Judi Baldwin

Your 5/28/18 TW (The God of Our Image) talks about the God of the Hebrew Scriptures having (and feeling) intense emotion…as opposed to the God of Christianity having been neutered.

Jerry and Lisa

I’m not sure exactly what you are disagreeing with here. Is it my use of the term “sinful nature”, which I think I understand and agree with you about, or that I am saying that we need to control our minds and our actions with our Spirit-empowered will regarding our emotions?

As I said, I agree with what I think your view is about the concept of a “sinful nature”. I actually somewhat misrepresented my views about that, which have changed over the years, as I somewhat carelessly and erroneously used an old term. I only meant “sinful nature” in the sense of our evil inclinations or desires, and our tendency to give in to temptations regarding the same. I hope you can see that that is why I included that phrase along with “yetzer hara” and “the flesh”.

However, that any bible believer would contest that we need to control ourselves, or our actions, regarding our emotions is unthinkable. Though I agree with the essence of your article, my main point in my reply is only that we do, indeed, need to exercise CONTROL, but not so much against external forces. It’s about SELF-control, and that not of our emotions, but of our minds and our actions regarding our emotions, through our will, by the help of the Ruach HaKodesh, in keeping with Torah in Messiah Yeshua. The scriptures are replete with exhortations about self-control and self-discipline of our minds and our actions, while validating our emotions. The grave error of many is to be on one end of the spectrum or the other when it comes to expression of emotions – from repression of to giving full vent to our emotions, regardless of the truth or His instructions. So I would agree that emotions are God-designed, but that it is the truth, His instructions, and the Ruach HaKodesh which are the rails upon which our emotions ought to ride and not visa versa. SELF-control is a fruit of the Ruach HaKodesh, is it not? Even, and especially, in our anger, hatred, rage, jealousy, enjoyment of pleasure, etc..

Rich Pease

Fear seems to be the emotional hot button.
The fear of abandoning oneself and giving our all over to God
is fear to the quintessential nth degree. It defies common sense.
Perhaps that’s why “Fear not” or “Do not worry” are the most
frequent petitions in the Bible — 366 times!
To align with the Creator is to receive His gifts of grace and grit
and allowing Him to transform our total being. Not an easy task.
But what a difference it makes!

Lesli

“What human beings are called to do is cooperate with God’s purposes and manage the results of that cooperative effort as God would manage them.”

Was it supposed to read “As God would like us to manage them?” As God would manage them? How would I know first thing in any circumstance about how He would manage/do?!? Did I misunderstand or have not read the instructions properly?

Other than that, I really love how amazingly detailed your TW have been to life on personal levels. Maybe it’s just that He is the Answer to all of our ailments…..{duh, Lesli…..} but I read them in your voice with what I think would be the emphasis and it reads personalized.

Lesli

Also, this….”It is more important for me to learn acceptance of what God is doing than it is for me to put my efforts into bringing about a world under my control.”….. exactly what I needed to think about. It gives me serenity…….

Laurita Hayes

“Remove the threat to self-determination”. Of all the pernicious fallout of our Greek insistence for form over function, the myth that the human self is defined by OPPOSITION to all ‘other’ lies at most of the inability of the Western mind to comprehend how reality really functions. We invent supportive myths to bolster this concept: “survival of the fittest”; “selective determinism”: all the bottom axioms of evolution, among other things, were invented in an attempt to justify the enthronement of the yetzer hara. Sorry. Nature failed to give us this justification. There is none, in fact.

Again, we are deceived because we wanted to be. ‘Self’ cannot ‘determine’ anything, even itself! Most of all, itself! Self, in fact, disappears at exactly the same rate that it sets itself against all other because self, made in the image of God, is defined BY all other.

In one of his more brilliant moments, C.S. Lewis described God as the sun: we become blinded if we attempt to see Him, but without Him, we can see nothing else. Therefore, we know He is there- not because we can see Him – but because, by means of Him, we can see all else. Like God, there is no ‘me’ to see because I am a sum of my involvement – my love – with all else. This is how we were really created.

I think to seek to define self by means of opposing (controlling) all other is as blindly insane as an attempt to separate ourselves from our shadows. The only time our shadows (rest of reality) are absent from us is when we are absent from it. We are blind because we want to be.

Lesli

Niiiiice Laurita! Very well written!!

Jeanette

I liked what Skip said in this.

Listen to Walter Williams. He understands what’s wrong with people not taking personal responsibility for themselves or when people sponge off of others. A lot of Christians don’t see anything wrong with asking people to pay for them because they think it’s ok not to actually work. ‘If you don’t work, you shouldn’t eat’. They think they are working. I think this sense of entitlement is a perversion of the truth. It’s damaging in so many ways. Some people want the government to give them things freely with the same sense of entitlement without realizing that we are the government or should be with what Skip said as our guide. God is the final authority.

The closer you are to getting the lies you have most likely been brought up believing out of your mind, the closer you are to freedom! There are so many. That’s why I recommend Skip’s Guardian Angel book. Relationships are more important than anything!

I recently listened to a man who went from super Christian to super atheist at the age of 40. It’s his new mission. On YouTube he talks about how Christianity made him sound like an idiot. Being around people who act religious is tiring and I understand what he means regarding some of the things Christians often say or do that also bothered me or made me uncomfortable being that I wasn’t brought up in a Protestant home. Many have separated themselves from the real world and are often times preaching lies that they are sure are true, like believing in an actual place called hell or that the devil is destroying their lives or that the world is going to end soon.

As far as laws are concerned, it really depends on what the law is. There are laws about the injection of poison into your body which must be rejected, disobeyed. It’s ruining lives and minds. God didn’t/doesn’t need big Pharma’s help. The present situation seems almost impossible to change with all the damage that’s been done starting about 70 years ago. Hearing the same lies over and over again effectively brainwashes people who have been mentally compromised the way it is. The suffering needs to stop.

Laurita Hayes

Right on, sister!

I am convinced we sin because we fall for two things: things that promise we don’t have to take responsibility. We all start out wanting something for nothing, and we fall for the fallacy that others are somehow ‘different’ than ourselves. Both mindsets trade in responsibility for victimhood and entitlement. This is how we are convinced to hand over our power (freedom of choice).

To stop the hemorrhaging – the damage – we have to agree to take back the responsibility (power of choice). This is the only freedom salvation promises. All sin is about trading choice for victimhood and/or entitlement. We have to learn to recognize the temptations!

To stand against the laws that violate the sacred space of our body temples is to honor God. We walk into slavery on our own two feet, but we need a Saviour to forklift us back out. Repentance for the sin of ducking responsibility that was God-given and entrusted to us is how we avail ourselves of that salvation. Admittedly, this is a tough sell in this day and age, where we have all been trained in the art of avoiding our own responsibilities before God, in the name of appetite (#1 on the list), laziness, the idea that our health is in the hands of others (from the advertising industry to the medical industry to the government – everybody but me is responsible!), entitlement, victimization, “the devil made me do it”, NIMBY, and general self abuse because, well, there’s a pill for all the side effects of sin these days, it seems!

The suffering will only stop when we repent for the sin of avoiding our accountability before heaven, instead of trading that accountability for “all the pleasures of sin”.