Dark Sayings
And the disciples came and said to Him, “Why do You speak to them in parables?” Matthew 13:10 NASB
Parables– “The Bible is familiar, life is strange.”[1] Maybe we have it backwards. Maybe the “dark sayings” are really how we live, and those verses in the Bible that seem so odd and impenetrable at first, are really crystal clear assessments of our own obscurity. Maybe the Bible’s language that so often leaves us confused about the meaning is really nothing more than a mirror on our own internal chaos. Maybe if we weren’t so duplicitous, so riddled with yetzer ha’ra self-protection, so absorbed with “right” answers and control, we would realize that those dark sayings are dark because we don’t have the light needed to see them.
“Why do you speak in parables?” might be more about the listener than about the speaker. Perhaps we don’t hear because we are the ones with the deficient apparatus.
One of the most interesting features about the biblical narrative is the necessity for the reader to create the text along with the author. What I mean is that biblical language is inherently flexible and messy. Crucial passages tend to be ambiguous. Story lines weave in and out of expected themes. Characters display a certain amount of religious bi-polar behavior. The meanings (and innuendos) of important terms are left up to the reader to supply. More often than not, the end of a story or a letter forces the reader to go back to the beginning and re-read the passage all over again because something about the end changes everything about the beginning. We can even say that this seems to be true for God’s entire plan and purpose. At any rate, it is simply impossible to remove the role of the reader. Like Heisenberg’s principle, the mere presence of the subject (the observer) changes the behavior of the object.
This is why Zornberg notes that the Bible is familiar but life itself is not. The Bible is culinary divine reduction. God boils it all down to a few conversations, a line or two of poetry, a narrative with an agenda, and apparently irrational behaviors. Then He invites us to notice how our lives reflect that same salmagundi, a gallimaufry of actions, emotions, wishes, defeats, control, and confusion. All of which is to say, if you read the Bible as a technical expert, as a recipe collector rather than as a chef in the kitchen, you will sterilize it. You will lose its intimate involvement in your life, its confrontation and consolation, its dark mirror manifestation of your inner life. Reading the Bible should be a white-water ride through your own emotional cascades. It was never meant to be a textbook for theological academicians or a jumping-off place for eloquent sermons.
Topical Index: parables, reader, dark sayings, Matthew 13:10
[1]Avivah Gottlieb Zornberg, The Beginning of Desire: Reflections on Genesis, p. xiii.
If the Son speaks in parables, so the Father speaks in parables as well…
Jesus gave them this answer: “Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does. John 5:19 NIV
Today’s Oswald Chambers reading is in sync with TW.
It says: “We are not asked to believe the Bible, but to
believe the One whom the Bible reveals.”
He then refers to Jn 5:39-40.
All scripture…inspired ‘salmagundi’…profitable for a “gallimaufry’ of ‘reality checks’…that I might be fitted for God’s plans, purposes and intentions.
What has been amazing to me is that people bring their paradigms to the Bible. You will find it on the pulpits of Freemasonry (at least in Christian or Jewish regions – they, of course, use the Torah) as well as Satanists (even though they do keep theirs upside down). The occultists I have known loved to quote scripture to me, even though a lot of times they would try to slip in their own slant, such as “I am the way, the truth and the LIGHT” (big favorite, apparently). My wanna-be Muslim friend who traveled to Mecca (and came back horribly sick from so much crowd exposure, of course) thinks the Bible is just fine as long as Jesus isn’t God, and my Christian evangelical friends love to quote Psalms and the prayer of Jabez but don’t see any point to reading Exodus 20. Even some of the precious people in my life that have jumped the believer ship still keep their Bibles near their bed so that they can read in them even more ways that the god they read about is so horrible. I have learned to quit being surprised.
The notion of just reading the Bible and letting it speak directly into their personal experience, unedited: nobody does that, apparently – at least in my world. Letting the Bible speak for itself, and thinking that what it says directly translates into personal life: WHAT?
Years ago when I read through quite a bit of Alice Bailey’s (and skimmed some of Blavatsky’s) writings, I sometimes marveled at how well Scripture was taken out of context to support occult theology. A favorite–which is also a fav in what I call hyper-charismaticism within Christendom–is Colossians 1:27: “…Christ in you, the hope of glory.” The occult meaning is such that “Christ” represents the ‘divine spark/light/life’ supposedly inherent in all humans, and this “Christ” is the means by which to reach ‘self-glorification’, i.e., self-deification.
Relatedly, I find it rather humorous that Bailey takes the Christian Trinitarian doctrine and turns it into an occult one. See diagram on page 48 with explanations beginning on 49 here: sacred-texts dot com/eso/ihas/ihas09.htm
So, how is this study or any other bible group, small group, church gathering changing me, us or those around us?
That is the “conflict” I perceive, wrestle with after attending those types of gatherings. Not much change. Do others want to follow the glory of God in me? If I am not making an impact, am I following or walking in a way that just pleases me? It is a reality check and maybe time to go into my closet and shut the door, again.
Such a truthful self reflection as found in Isaiah 45:14-15, which comes to mind as confirmation of Christ in you principle.
Thank you. I am. Not alone on this journey!
This sort of supports something I have been telling people lately. “Death has no complications but life does” If the Bible is written to us by the Author of life and it is a way for us to find Him and true life, it would need to be constituted in such a way that we might find its aplications real to us. These applications would need to be for our lives today and not just somones 2000 years ago. And so it is and does. I know Skkip does not concur that the book was authored by somone outside our space and time continuioum but there certainly is a mystery in this I have yet to resolve…As God is the Author of time he is in and out of it or present in all times, so is his word some how? It is living. …