Paradigm Shift

and that you are to be renewed in the spirit of your minds,  and to put on the new self, which in the likeness of God has been created in righteousness and holiness of the truth.  Ephesians 4:23-24 NASB

In the spirit of your minds – What comes first—the chicken or the egg?  What comes first—a change in thinking or a change in behavior?  Paul’s Greek message seems to suggest that the new man begins with a change in thinking, but many examples from the Semitic world support the idea that changes in behavior results in new thinking.  Perhaps transformation can occur in either direction and Paul suggests this “thought to action” pattern because he is writing in a Greek-speaking world.  Nevertheless, we should recognize the counter example of na’aseh ve-nishma (“we will do and we will hear) in Exodus 24:7.[1]  Perhaps what truly matters is the change; the direction is only secondary.

Paul’s statement reveals another Greek priority: the place of cognition.  Paul doesn’t write, “in your spirit,” but rather “in the spirit of your minds.”  In Hebrew we might have written only the first part, “in your spirit,” because the Hebrew view of human being focuses on the essential relationship between God’s animating breath (spirit) and our living being.  The Greek paradigm shifts this equation.  For the Greeks, cognition is the focal point of human existence.  The real is the rational.  Man is the measure of all things.  Mind over matter.  Our contemporary Western world is built on this idea.  In fact, for all practical purposes, the “spirit” has been exiled from the modern world.  Mircea Eliade calls this the non-religious man.[2]

But it is only in the modern societies of the West that nonreligious man has developed fully. Modern nonreligious man assumes a new existential situation; he regards himself solely as the subject and agent of history, and he refuses all appeal to transcendence. In other words, he accepts no model for humanity outside the human condition as it can be seen in the various historical situations. Man makes himself, and he only makes himself completely in proportion as he desacralizes himself and the world. The sacred is the prime obstacle to his freedom. He will become himself only when he is totally demysticized. He will not be truly free until he has killed the last god.[3]

Certainly Paul did not endorse this extension of Greek cognition.  When he writes, “in the spirit of your minds,” he is thinking in Hebrew, not Greek.[4]  In the Hebrew worldview, “mind” is a kind of summary of several Hebrew terms: lēb, lēbāb, yēṣer, nepeš.  Every one of these terms has divine overtones.  In other words, it’s not possible to think of human beings in Hebrew terms without including a divine connection.  Every word used to describe what it means to be human has its roots in the divine creative act.  Putting on the “new self” isn’t just thinking differently about the world.  It is thinking about the world from the perspective of the God of Israel.  That’s why Paul adds, “in the likeness of God.”  His audience, once part of the polytheistic culture of Ephesus, is exhorted to adopt a singular point of view; the point of view elucidated in the Hebrew scriptures.  In other words, become “Jewish” in thought and action.

It’s important to recognize that Paul’s idea of becoming Jewish in the first century is not the same as conversion to Judaism today.  Paul argued quite strongly that inclusion in the Messianic community did not mean conversion to orthodox Judaism (Acts 15).  What it meant was adopting a worldview based on the teachings of the Messiah on the Torah.  For those coming from a pagan culture, this change meant adopting a Jewish way of living.  For Jews, it meant recognizing Yeshua’s role in God’s plan.  Pagans converted.  Jews accepted.  The practices outlined in Acts 15 involve leaving behind pagan rites and rituals—and slowly relearning what it meant to live according to Moses.  Thought processes were involved, but what really mattered was change in behavior.  Give up some ways of behaving by replacing them with other ways.  Then the worldview will change along with the actions.

Paul is extremely anxious for his reading audience to adopt a new way of living.  This new way of living is based on righteousness, holiness, and truth.  Those terms are defined by the Tanakh, and so are the actions that come from them.  The new way of living is really adopting a very old way of living.  It’s not getting rid of ancient instructions.  It’s making those ancient instructions contemporary.

Topical Index: new man, mind, heart, inclination, self, conversion, Ephesian 4:23-24

[1] For further exegesis, see https://rabbisacks.org/covenant-conversation/mishpatim/we-will-do-and-we-will-hear/

[2] https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/626643-a-non-religious-man-today-ignores-what-he-considers-sacred-but

[3] https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/9878015-it-is-easy-to-see-all-that-separates-this-mode

[4] For another investigation of this verse, see https://skipmoen.com/2022/10/an-act-of-creation/

 

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Richard Odenthal

Skip,

I have been traveling a lot in recent weeks. My parents are in declining health and I live several states away. On a happier note my wife and I traveled to southern Patagonia to surprise meet my youngest daughter five minutes after her boy friend proposed. He wanted us to surprise her. The reason I am saying this is to let you know that this latest series on Ephesians 4 has been perfect. Each day I have thought about each Today’s Word all day. I wanted to thank you for helping keep God’s word in front of me during my travels when time is extremely limited.

Tim Baker

Adam sinned and everything went south from there spiraling ever deeper into depravity…then the flood. The spiraling scaled back in volume, but not in direction. The noetic effect of sin as they say. YHWH, in His compassion and mercy, “visited” the sins of the fathers on the children by giving them the Law to counteract, slow, inhibit, reverse, the effects of sin…if one kept it. The noetic effect of obedience. It starts with a thought, (from the spirit of YHWH?, from your own mind?, yes to both), proceeds to the smallest obedience, the mind (reason) is altered, more obedience, more enlightenment, more tests and trials, etc, etc.

Psalm 119 is replete with David asking to be taught, to have his eyes opened, for understanding, to be made steadfast, for life. It is also full of his declarations, “I will be steadfast in keeping your law, I have chosen to walk in your ways, I delight myself in your ordinances, I love your precepts…”.

So, the way I see it, you don’t know till you know, and you won’t know till you obey. Jesus did what was necessary to free us and empower us to love God demonstrated by obedience. He was obedient so we could and should be obedient.
Thanks for this great post today Skip. It really got the cogs turning.

Richard Bridgan

Repentance is an act of turning from that brought into existence to that desired to be brought into existence— the removal of what is past to embrace that which is freed to and for creative renewal in the present— whereby one’s past is overcome, being renewed by an act that seeks re-creation. This is obtained by engaging in the commensurate pursuit and employment of self creation, starting over with a fresh, clean, different and true image… an image of being human that is made, formed and sustained in the image of God—the man, Christ Jesus.

This new way of living— based on righteousness, holiness, and truth— is before all things; and by whom all things that exist have come to exist.

Jesus said…, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you had known me, you would have known my Father also. From now on you know him and have seen him.” (John 14:6-7)

And ⌊whatever⌋ you ask in my name, I will do this, in order that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you ask me anything in my name, I will do it. (John 14:13-14)

Richard Bridgan

Ideally, every person would ask her/himself, “By what or by whose spirit do I form my self image?”… and then, “By what or by whose spirit should I form my self image?”