Divine Laundry Services
I erased your transgressions like a thick cloud, and like a cloud have I erased your sins; return to Me for I have redeemed you. Isaiah 44:22 Chabad
Erased – māḥâ. God’s solution to our transgressions. As you recall, David asked for his guilt and his misdeeds to be washed away. God has another word for the same action. māḥâ, a verb about correcting the entry on a scroll. “ . . . erasures in ancient leather scrolls were made by washing or sponging off the ink rather than blotting. ‘Wipe out’ is therefore more accurate for the idea of expunge.”[1] Not erased, but washed off. Kaiser offers a summary:
The sinner prays as David did that God will blot out, i.e. erase his transgressions and iniquities (Ps 51:1 [H 3], 9 [H 11]). God does so for his own sake and remembers those sins no longer (Isa 43:25). Thus sins which loomed as a thick cloud were blotted out (Isa 44:22). While God is omniscient, these sins he deliberately remembers against us no longer. The reverse action can be seen in Ps 109:14, and Neh 4:5 [H 3:37]. māḥâ is also used to describe the lifestyle of an adulterous woman who eats, wipes her mouth, and protestingly claims that she has done no wrong (Prov 30:20).[2]
Isaiah isn’t the only prophet to proclaim the good news of God’s laundromat. Consider Ezekiel:
Do I desire the death of the wicked? says the Lord God. Is it not rather in his repenting of his ways that he may live? Ezekiel 18:23 Chabad
Here we find the significant and frequent idea of returning. Repenting isn’t quite the answer. I can regret my error, feel remorse about its outcome, even wish it had not occurred, but unless there is a change in direction, unless I walk out of the laundry with thoroughly cleaned clothes, my regret and remorse mean little. The Hebrew verb, šûb, requires a return to the right way.
The Bible is rich in idioms describing man’s responsibility in the process of repentance. Such phrases would include the following: “incline your heart unto the Lord your God” (Josh 24:23): “circumcise yourselves to the Lord” (Jer 4:4); “wash your heart from wickedness” (Jer 4:14); “break up your fallow ground” (Hos 10:12) and so forth. All these expressions of man’s penitential activity, however, are subsumed and summarized by this one verb šûb. For better than any other verb it combines in itself the two requisites of repentance: to turn from evil and to turn to the good.[3]
Nothing matters if you don’t get back to the right way. As we’ve learned over and over, what counts is the subsequent behavior, not the psychological adjustment. Nothing gets wiped away unless there’s a change.
Topical Index: māḥâ, šûb, erased, return, Isaiah 44:22, Ezekiel 18:23
[1] Kaiser, W. C. (1999). 1178 מָחָה. In R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer Jr., & B. K. Waltke (Eds.), Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament(electronic ed., p. 498). Moody Press.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Hamilton, V. P. (1999). 2340 שׁוּב. In R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer Jr., & B. K. Waltke (Eds.), Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament(electronic ed., p. 909). Moody Press.




“Nothing matters if you don’t get back to the right way… Nothing gets wiped away unless there’s a change.” Emet!
Thanks be to God… “He has not dealt with us according to our sins, nor repaid us according to our iniquities…
For as the heavens are high above the earth,
so his loyal love prevails over those who fear him.
As far as east is from west,
so he has removed far from us the guilt of our transgressions.
As a father pities his children,
so Yahweh pities those who fear him.
For he knows our frame.
He remembers that we are dust. (Psalm 103 :10-14)
“Nothing gets wiped away unless there’s a change.”
This is a curious statement to me. I see that “it says what it says in Jeremiah 4:4, and that’s quite chilling actually. But what about the thief on the cross? He had zero opportunity to get back to the right way. Hands and feet nailed to a cross, death imminent. All he could do was acknowledge he had been living on the wrong path. “Today, you with be with me in gan Eden,” Could he possibly have been ignorant of Torah? Maybe he wasn’t even a Jew? The scriptures as far as I can remember didn’t say he was or was not. Or the woman at the well, or the woman caught in adultery about to be stoned? There’s no indication they were looking for salvation nor striving for holiness. The woman caught in adultery looks like a set up to me, mostly because the man who was the other adulterous participant was not sent out to be stoned. But I digress.
The benefit of pressing into the Hebrew Aramaic paradigm to me seemed to be that it primarily erased the old “out with the old, in with the new” replacement theology I was “gifted”, and brought significant cohesion to the entire scriptural account that I was taught didn’t exist. Law vs. grace. Yeah we keep printing and re-translating three quarters of the book we call the Bible but that part is mostly irrelevant.
”Man rarely comprehends how dangerously mighty he is”. Abraham Heschel. I’ve begun to see this, and the weight of it is sometimes too much. We’ve been granted the awesome and terrible power of choice, and the world has been shaking ever since.
Heschel also made this statement: “Transcendence is the test of religious truth. A genuine insight rends the closure of the heart and bestows on man the power to rise above himself”. Where is this power?
Thank you for sharing these substantial considerations, Kent.
Thanks for saying so Richard I appreciate it. I hope my comments did not come across as pugnacious in any way. I’m honestly wrestling with many things and my questions are honest questions, meaning I hope someone has an answer because I sure don’t!
I appreciate this forum very much and what Skip puts out here. After reading his article the day after this one I felt like he was setting us up a bit, and I always take the bait! 😁