The Utopian Rebellion – Guest Author

The Utopian Rebellion by Matt Woodward

In February 2026, Generative Artificial Intelligence advanced to Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Hornyack, 2025). Unlike Generative AI, which generates content when prompted, Agentic AI operates independently toward goals, using tools, making decisions, and managing workflows without ongoing human guidance. This shift prompts companies to reconsider how people, robots, and AI agents collaborate for faster, smarter decisions. Many view this as a future of abundance (Diamandis, 2026), while others remain unconvinced. As AI reshapes jobs, many individuals may be unmotivated to adapt or retrain. Society faces a turning point, dividing into three possible paths: embracing AI, succumbing to nihilism, or engaging in revolt.

The Scope of AI

As technology has advanced, “AI has handed every human being on the planet an extraordinary set of tools: the ability to build software, design products, generate content, start companies, and pursue ambitions that previously required teams of specialists and millions in capital… The question is not whether AI will transform everything. It will. The question is whether you’re the one doing the transforming… or the one being transformed” (Diamantis, 2026). According to Mo Gawdat, former chief business officer at Google, innovation is happening so rapidly that everything will change (Gawdat, 2026). Not only human jobs, but the entire economic system, government, and culture will be disrupted and transformed into something new.

Stanford University’s HAI reports that AI is advancing faster than benchmarks and quickly surpassing human-level performance (HAI, 2026). As AI adoption grows, entry-level jobs have decreased by 35% (WEF, 2026). Our current economic systems were not designed for an AI-driven world. Solutions like Universal Basic Income (UBI) and Universal High Income (UHI) might entirely reshape government and societal structures. While many in technology anticipate a near-Utopian abundance, a thorough examination of society’s systems is needed.

Past Meets Present

The argument for an abundant future often generalizes society. Yuval Harari highlights millions who may not willingly adapt to an AI world (Harari, 2017). He predicts a “global useless class” will arise, not only from unemployment but also from individuals becoming unemployable. As AI progresses, many people’s ability to keep up with necessary skills will diminish.

Sociologists have been studying shifts in culture for decades. Ascertaining the current analysis, four sociologists will be discussed. Weber, Durkheim, Simmel, and Bourdieu each offer insights into our current situation.

Max Weber recognized that one’s position in society shapes one’s attitude toward God; henceforth, these ideas about God could create a social and economic reality. He argued that the Protestant ethic, with its emphasis on universal priesthood, personal achievement, and individual judgment, produced cultures that stressed hard work, sobriety, savings, and traditionally defined ethical behavior. In turn, these religiously based values and behaviors provided the foundation of modern capitalist, productive, and democratic societies. Thus, Weber argued that theology could and did create society (Weber, 1976).

If AI and tech corporations are moving society away from a modern capitalist, individual, productive, and democratic society, what will it become? Weber’s theory holds that our individual identity comes from our work; yet if our work dissipates and becomes irreplaceable, how will many find purpose in life?  This is Weber’s most famous and haunting image. As capitalism rationalized and bureaucratized society, he argued that humans built a system so efficient and self-sustaining that it traps the very people who created it. Originally, people worked hard because of genuine religious conviction. But over time the system hardened into rules, institutions, and structures that compel behavior regardless of belief or meaning. He wrote that what was once a light cloak had become an iron cage — people are now locked inside a system of rational economic activity with no exit and no transcendent purpose to justify it.

Durkheim’s theory of Anomie is highly relevant in today’s rapidly advancing AI environment. Anomie refers to the breakdown of social norms guiding behavior. Durkheim describes it as a revolt or withdrawal from society’s controls. He believes all deviant behavior, including suicide, arises from anomie (Malik, 2022, p. 9). The weakening job market is expected to worsen as AI replaces more jobs. Those who choose to reskill and leverage AI may enjoy abundant opportunities, but many others may not. In Louisiana, 16% of youth aged 16-24 are unemployed and not in school; 16% of youth aged 18-24 lack a high school diploma; and only 53% of third graders read at or above grade level. Those with limited education or skills will face difficulty in the AI economy. Many may become part of Harari’s “useless class.”

Durkheim’s Anomie arises when social functions such as industry or science are poorly regulated, often because rapid economic and technological shifts outpace the development of new moral rules. People may feel like “lifeless cogs,” repeating tasks without knowing their purpose or how they connect to larger goals. Durkheim argued that suicide can arise in societies where intense conformity and strict controls suppress criticism and dissent, blocking adaptation. Rebellion, not nihilism, becomes vital for social life.

Simmel’s Tragedy of Culture suggests humans create art, law, science, and technology to express spirit, but these forms become independent and impersonal (Leithart, 2006). At what point are creators replaced by creations—not just in jobs, but perhaps as beings? As AI and robots spread, some propose that these creations could become conscious (Bordea, 2026). If so, how would society and humanity respond?

Pierre Bourdieu describes the “Habitus” in his work The Logic of Practice.  Habitus is defined simply as a system of dispositions. “How much habitus is either a force of continuity or a force of change depends on one’s understanding of how informed the individual is of the complex social process in which the individual and collective ever-structuring dispositions develop in practice to justify the individual’s perspectives, values, actions, and social positions” (Grusendorf, 2016, p. 7). In other words, the bulk of an individual’s action may be understood to simply be a pre-reflexive response to the world around them, based not on their conscious decision to act, but rather the schema in which they were raised.

In a world dominated by social media, children’s schema comes less from family, teachers, pastors, or neighbors and more from devices that consume their time. Jonathan Heidt’s Anxious Generation notes social media drives addiction, mental illness, and suicide (2024). Sorting reality from propaganda is difficult and divides society. With advanced AI, complex algorithms will further shape society’s perceptions. For many, perception is reality, and people become what they repeatedly encounter.

Sociology and Motivation

As technology advances, jobs disappear, and people have more leisure time, humanity faces important questions. As some people thrive by integrating AI into their lives, others may be left behind. If work stops providing meaning and the government fulfills basic needs, life’s purpose becomes unclear. The sociologists discussed share motivational overlap with psychology’s SDT Theory, which centers on Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness (Ryan, 2022).

If motivation is found in video games and labor is replaced by AI robots, will this segment of society find meaning, or will nihilism eventually set in, causing an Anomie state of mind? The implications are significant: without meaningful engagement, society risks rising rates of suicide or rebellion (Edman, 2024, p. 67-68). Unaddressed, this tipping point may challenge the very foundation of our culture, demanding thoughtful action from leaders, educators, and policymakers alike.

The Tipping Point

As AI continues to reshape employment, a large percentage of society may not be motivated to reskill or retool for an AI future. Society is reaching a tipping point that may fork into three potential directions: AI immersion, nihilism, and revolt. Many will learn new skills and succeed by using AI to enhance their business, personal, and spiritual lives. For those who choose not to reskill, or who do not have the ability to do so, where will this part of society find purpose or meaning in life? The tech executives of Silicon Valley believe in a new Utopian reality with no need for retirement or income. Yet as Weber points out, work brings meaning.

Looking at Weber’s Iron Cage theory, those who embrace AI may find themselves inside the cage, yet finding no meaning. Those who embrace a video game solution may fall into nihilism, as Weber’s disenchanted subjects. All motivation has subsided and life becomes meaningless. Then, there may be those who attempt to break free of the cage. A revolt against the machine or the culture of AI. As Durkheim predicts, Anomie, a necessary rebellion against that which suffocates and destroys motivation for life.

The future of AI may not only accelerate disenchantment, but complete it by removing even the dignity of labor that gave Weber’s cage any justification. Moreover, Genesis 2:15 tells the story of man being placed in the Garden of Eden. He is given a task to work/ till the garden. The Hebrew word for work is abad, לְעָבְדָהּ, which also means to worship through service. Work and worship are the same word. It is in our work that we find meaning. As we speed into our future, leaders and sociologists may need to work together to redefine work, meaning, and purpose.

Sociology can diagnose the crisis, but the question of what replaces work as meaning may require a deeper answer than policy or the reskilling of work. It may take a recovery of wonder, something no algorithm can generate, to remind humanity why breaking free is worth the effort. “As civilization advances, the sense of wonder declines. Such a decline is an alarming symptom of our state of mind. Mankind will not perish for want of information, but only for a want of appreciation. The beginning of our happiness lies in the understanding that life without wonder is not worth living. What we lack is not a will to believe but a will to wonder” (Heschel, p. 41). Regardless of these words being over sixty years old, they ring ever true today. We need a voice of one crying out in the wilderness. A prophet for today, calling humanity back to wonder. It is here that we will find our meaning and purpose in life.

WORKS CITED

Bodea, M. (2026). Steps forward to synthetic consciousness measurement. Cognitive Processing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01341-9

Charles, K. (2021, March 9). Study: Improved video game technology contributed to decline in work by younger men. Yale Insights. yale.edu

Diamandis, P. (2026, April 9). A Disruptive Moment in Time. Metatrends. https://metatrends.substack.com/p/a-disruptive-moment-in-time?utm_source=podcast-email%2Csubstack&publication_id=6133698&post_id=193741466&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_medium=email&r=6h5e84&triedRedirect=true.

Diamandis, P. (2026, April 17). Humanity Is About to “Fork”. Metatrends. https://metatrends.substack.com/p/humanity-is-about-to-fork?utm_source=podcast-email%2Csubstack&publication_id=6133698&post_id=194518496&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_medium=email&r=6h5e84&triedRedirect=true

Edman, T. B. (2024). In the Mirror of the Matrix: The Labyrinth of Anomie and Simulation in the Digital Age. Temaşa Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi, (22), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.55256/temasa.1528180

Gawdat, M. (2026). Alive: A human’s guide to living in the world of AI. Bluebird.

Grusendorf, S. A. (2016). Bourdieu’s Field, Capital, and Habitus in Religion. Journal for the Sociological Integration of Religion and Society, 6(1), 1-13. https://sociologyandchristianity.org/index.php/jsc/article/view/84

Haidt, J. (2024). The anxious generation: How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness. Penguin Press.

Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow. HarperCollins.

Hornyak, T. (2025). Agentic AI Is Here—But Are We Ready? Research-Technology Management, 68(5), 59–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2025.2532320

1. A., & Malik, F. A. (2022). Emile Durkheim contributions to sociology. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR), 6(2), 7–10

 Heschel, A. J. (2011). Abraham Joshua Heschel: Essential writings (S. Heschel, Ed.). Orbis Books.

Leithart, P. (2026, May 3). Simmel, Faithfulness, and Gratitude. Theopolis Institute. https://theopolisinstitute.com/leithart_post/simmel-faithfulness-and-gratitude/

Ryan, R., Duineveld, J., Di Domenico, S., Ryan, W., Steward, B., & Bradshaw, E. (2022). We know this much is (meta-analytically) true: A meta-review of meta-analytic findings evaluating self-determination theory. Psychological Bulletin, 148(11-12), 813–842. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000385

Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI. (2026). Artificial intelligence index report 2026. Stanford University. https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report

The Data Center. (2025, December 16). New Orleans Youth Dashboard. https://www.datacenterresearch.org/data-resources/new-orleans-youth-dashboard/

Weber, M. (1976) The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner Talcott Parsons, Trans.

Weir, K. (2025, March 2). Self-determination theory:A quarter century of human motivation research.https://www.apa.org/research-practice/conduct-research/self-determination-theory

World Economic Forum. (2026, March 26). How AI is changing the nature of entry level work.https://www.weforum.org/stories/2026/03/how-ai-is-changing-the-nature-of-entry-level-work/

Young, K. (2016, December 3). The unemployed and video game addiction: New trends in the workforce. NetAddiction. netaddiction.com