A Gift for You
Now I praise you because you remember me in everything, and hold firmly to the traditions, just as I delivered them to you. 1 Corinthians 11:2 NASB
Traditions – There is little doubt that the mixed assembly in Corinth had a lot of problems. Internal strife, immorality among the members, dissention and struggles with proper order are the subjects of much of Paul’s instruction to this group. But in spite of Paul’s concerns and stern correction, he can still say, “I praise you.” Why? Because this motley crew has held on to the paradoseis, the traditions delivered to them. Now what do you suppose that means?
The word paradosis (tradition) is used negatively in Mark 7:3 and 7:8 as a description of what men have added to Torah. Yeshua rejects such additions. But the word is used positively in 2 Thessalonians 2:15 and 1 Corinthians 11:2 as proper instruction handed down by Yeshua Himself. Obviously, there is a place for correct tradition.
But what is Paul talking about? The word itself implies that the traditions do not originate with Paul. Traditions are old. They have been in practice and have been part of the beliefs of the community for a long time. Paul is simply acknowledging that he passed them on to the Corinthians and they have been following them. That means Paul learned them from someone else. Where did they come from? Paul gives us a clue when he defends himself before Agrippa. “I have lived as Pharisee according to the strictest sect of our religion” (Acts 26:5). The verb is aorist active indicative. Paul doesn’t say that he used to be a Pharisee. He says that he still is a Pharisee. His life has always been governed by the strict code of the sect of the Pharisees. Notice that he refers to “our religion.” Actually, the Greek uses the word threskeia which means “form of worship,” indicating mostly the observable rituals and practices. Paul is saying, in essence, that he still holds to the Jewish form of life in daily expression and in worship. These are the traditions. They were passed on to him by his instructors and he is passing them on to his pupils.
It is simply too much of a stretch to claim that the “traditions” that Paul references began with Yeshua. Barely twenty years have passed since the resurrection, hardly enough time to establish traditions, especially since the assemblies of Messianic believers were still in their infancy. Furthermore, Paul’s comments to Timothy also indicate that the history of the “good news” and the associated practice in the community has a much older origin. It is reasonable to conclude that Paul’s remark refers to the centuries of Jewish practice and rituals. Christian practices and rituals separate from Judaism had not been developed when Paul wrote this letter. In fact, it took another 150 years for Christianity to create its own traditions.
Finally, we should note that the word paradoseis is derived from a Greek word that means “gift.” Traditions are gifts to the faithful. Why are they gifts? They aren’t earned. They are personal invitations. They don’t depend on personal righteousness. They come from previous experience with God and are delivered without charge to those who have joined the community. They carry only one obligation – pass them on to the next ones. Paul fully intended that the Corinthian believers continue the legacy of the traditions, but something happened. Somewhere between Corinth and the Vatican, these traditions were lost or replaced. Knowing how that happened is crucial if we ever want to find the lost gift.
Topical Index: tradition, paradosis, 1 Corinthians 11:2, Acts 26:5, Act 24
Something very radical happened to Paul, (formerly known as Saul),
~ and within an hour he was preaching in the synagogue of the Jews about Yeshua, that He is The Son of God ~ (Acts 9.20)
~ and all those who heard him were astounded and they were saying, “Was this not he who was persecuting all those who are calling on this Name in Jerusalem? And he was even sent here to bind them to convey them to The Chief Priests!” ~ (Acts 9.21)
~ But Shaul was strengthened even more and was agitating those Jews who were dwelling in Darmsuq as he was showing that This One is The Messiah ~ (Acts 9.22)
How was this “message” received? Christ was rejected the first time around- violently. “Let Him be crucified” is not exactly known as a warm welcome. But Shaul was shown- this is the Christ, the Chosen ONE Who was prophesied for centuries. His message was the same as John the Baptizer- “Behold the Lamb.”
~ And after that many days were fulfilled, the Jews took counsel to kill him ~ (Acts 9.23)
I can easily see how this message might “agitate.” And really- the crucifixion of the Messiah doesn’t make any sense at all.. He came to die? What victory is there in death? The Messiah should be a conquering King- right? Yes. He is. And He conquered Death- by dying- the only ONE ever who willingly chose to die a death that was not His own! Through His death and resurrection He conquered (in total victory) Death, Sin, the Grave and hasatan. Four enemies we have had since Adam. ~ O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? ~ (1 Corinthians 15.55) Someone has conquered Death and Someone has conquered the grave. Someone has accomplished (in totality) the victory over sin and hasatan- What is His Name? – and Who is this Man? (Who is this King of glory?) Who, (someone asked) rose from the dead- three days later? Who rolled the stone away? Who split the veil of temple in two from top to the bottom?- and why?
No one has ever come back from the dead. Only ONE Man. And we know Who this is, we know His Name, this ONE who has conquered. You want a King? You have ONE. Looking for a Priest?- Look no further. Looking for a Prophet? Here He is. Still searching for the Messiah? No need to look anywhere else, this is He of whom the prophets spoke. The promised Messiah has come.
The traditions of men? Wonderful. May all these traditions remind us of Him whose Body is the Bread. Of Him whose blood is the Wine. And when,during these times of remembrance and celebration, we enjoy life with each other, – let us (all) never fail to remember the ONE who gives us life and gives it more abundantly.
Indeed, not all traditions, nor cultures are unworthy of being kept. Some are quite scriptural based, e.g.
our Hebrew teacher taught us that it’s impolite to go empty-handed when invited first time to someone’s home. They always bring a gift. We are to bring something before ABBA too, and not meet Him empty handed!
YHWH go with you, Skip, on this trip. May many profit spiritually from your teachings.
Shalom, blessings and prayers!
???”They are personal inventions.”???
Not clear on what that means.
“???”They are personal inventions.”???
Hi Pam,
I think that is a typo, which should be “They are not personal inventions”
They are gifts from God
oooooooooooooooooh! K
Or invitations?
That was my first thought.
“Or invitations?”
“That was my first thought”
Hmmm
Nice thoughts but Skip doesn’t usually use wrong word 🙂
Invention for invitation?
Skip doesn’t USUALLY use the wrong word, but sometimes he does (by mistake). And this is one of those times. I have corrected it.
“personal INVITATIONS”
Thanks all.
“personal INVITATIONS”
Hi Skip,
Thanks funny (I meant to write “that’s funny,” really)
As something of an old Freudian, I tend to think of those mistakes as “Freudian slips”
Or “cosmic coincidences” depending on whether I’m in spiritual or secular mode
Because I actually got a kind of “invitation” to lunch yesterday from an old friend
What struck me about the invitation was her name, which I had never really noticed before
Her last name is Askari, and I usually see it as As Kari, but yesterday I saw it as Ask Ari
So I Googled Ari and was amused to find the following meaning of Ari
Hindi
‘Ari’ means “Not of Sin” in Hindi. Ari also means “one who shows the right path”
I met her shortly after “meeting” you when she worked under the same manager as I did
Actually it was the same “second line” manager, and when she “stepped down” from management
I sent her the first and only Today’s Word I had ever received from you
She was a great manager and it was a great Today’s Word
Skip, thanks for making the point about the verb being used in the “aorist active indicative”. I had recently given a ‘sub-scholarly’ effort to find out what tense that verb was in. It makes a HUGE difference in how to interpret other verses.
We’ll blame it on that dared spell check. 🙂