Hebrew Anagrams

Naomi said to her daughter-in-law, “Blessed be he of the LORD, who has not failed in His kindness to the living or to the dead! For,” Naomi explained to her, “the man is related to us; he is one of our redeeming kinsmen.”  Ruth 2:20  JPS

Failed – “Hebrew words suggest each other,” says Eskenazi.[1]  What she implies is not limited to common phrases.  It’s true that we need to pay attention to the connections between similar Hebrew words.  For example, it is no accident that the same word is used to describe both Adam’s unconscious state when Havvah is formed and Abraham’s deep sleep when God establishes the covenant.  The phrase “listened to voice of your wife” in the story of Adam and the story of Abraham is deliberate.  But common occurrences are not the only way Hebrew draws connections.  Some ways are much more subtle.

Tikva Frymer-Kensky points out that the name “Boaz” (b-‘z) is the reverse of the consonants found in the word “abandon” (‘ –z-b).  The author of Ruth loves word games, and this is truly one of the most subtle of them.  Obviously, it can only be seen in Hebrew.  It makes the story about Boaz’ actions even more delightful.

Boaz is the kinsman redeemer.  You might ask yourself why Naomi never bothers to mention this to Ruth prior to Ruth’s encounter with him.  Nevertheless, at this point in the story Naomi confesses that there is in fact a man who can assist them.  The meaning of his name isn’t clear.  It might mean “there is strength in him” or it might refer to one of the two pillars in the Great Hall of the Temple.  But if the character of a man is revealed in his name, then the actions of a man display that character, and in the case of Boaz, we see a man of faith, compassion and strength.  More than anything else in the story of Ruth, we see a man who brings about the blessing of God.  He is the exact opposite of azav (to abandon).  This is the point of the anagram.  Boaz and “abandon” don’t go together.

With this anagram in mind, it might be necessary to re-read the story.  Ask yourself if Boaz doesn’t fulfill each requirement in the chain of hesed while all along crediting YHWH with the actions.  Boaz is the model of a man who does all that he can without thinking he is doing anything more than what is required.  He is the picture of hesed.  And that picture demonstrates what it means to reflect the character of the Most High God in a setting that hardly ever mentions God at all.  The anagram is more than a clever trick.  It is a call to become the living display of hesed in the lives of those around us.  It is turning failure into blessing.

Do you think that God might mix up the letters of your name and produce a demonstration of His character?  There’s only one way to find out.  Do hesed and see what happens.

Topical Index:  abandon, fail, azav, Boaz, hesed, Ruth 2:20



[1] Tamara Eskenazi and Tikva Frymer-Kensky, Ruth: The JPS Bible Commentary, p. 44.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael

“Do you think that God might mix up the letters of your name and produce a demonstration of His character?”

Hmmm

The first thing that comes to my mind is my Dog Max

As a dog, he is “man’s best friend”

And like God, Max gives me unconditional love

And like God, dog is a three letter word

And Max has an (X) in his name to contain 4 letters

The Door to

YHVH

Michael

8. The midrash
a. The promise of entering God’s “rest” still stands (v. 1).
1) The generation that perished in the Wilderness did NOT enter God’s rest (i.e., the “Promised
Land”) because they did not trust the LORD (v. 2).
b. Those who believe (i.e., trust God) DO enter His rest (i.e., the Olam Ha-Ba) (v. 3).

Hmmm

Just quickly reading through a PDF that I recently received from Rabbi Gorelik

And noticed quite a number of linguistic configurations like the “Olam Ha-Ba”

Made me think of a conversation today with my daughter who wanted to go to Cabo San Lucas (Xmas)

I really didn’t want to go to Cabo although my youngest brother Peter built a house there years ago

On the beach

My mother died there the year before my daughter was born and I have not been there since

I liked Cabo a lot and would go there to wind surf with Peter and my friend James who is like a brother

One time after wind surfing we were having a drink and some food in this little restaurant on the beach

And Peter met this wind surfer at the bar who was to become a good friend of ours

He was a very interesting guy who had lived and worked in the Soviet Union and spoke perfect Spanish

He was also fluent in Russian

Dennis M was living in Mexico City (DM) at that time and Jim and I went to visit him the following year

His younger son “Caleb” was about five at the time and we got along well together

There were a number of references to Caleb in Rabbi Gorelik’s PDF and it made me think of Caleb M

There was also a young man name Caleb where I worked recently

And we got along well together

Ann Hanks

I have a recently renewed interest in the book of Ruth. I had forgotten about the Jewish tradition of reading it during the Feast of Weeks, but remember thinking, years ago, how odd that seemed to me. Now I think I get it better. Ruth as the good wife, Boaz as the redeemer man, and Pentecost as a first fruits harvest feast now all just fall into place.

Gadu

Ruth wave, how we do oral communication of Ruth? is like root!!!! the root of the word. Ruth is the Root in a chain of events. Before i use the terms coincidence or is not by accident, than I use synchronicity and finally today I know that the best definition for those chained-event visible outside of the box can be defined as Phenomenology. Phenomenology that captures imagination through the four season (path of the Mazzaroth).