Chthonic Mysteries

My frame was not hidden from You, when I was made in secret, and skillfully wrought in the depths of the earth;  Psalm 139:15  NASB

In the depths of the earth– Did you think the Psalmist was writing about personal, human birth?  Perhaps you even read it as God’s inspired statement about your birth.  The Psalmist certainly is writing about some kind of birth, and the fact that whatever is going on in the dark and secret places before birth is well-known to God.  But ask yourself, “Was I made in the depths of the earth?”  Not likely.  Unless, of course, you are a Greek Titan.  So if human beings are not “skillfully wrought in the depths of the earth,” then what is this really saying?

Perhaps we need a few definitions:

Primordial: existing at or from the beginning of time, (especially of a state or quality) basic and fundamental.

Mythological: concerning a traditional story, especially one about the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events.

What happens in the depths of the earth?  Life!  Life comes from somewhere, and in Hebrew thought, life is intimately connected to ʾădāmâ (ground, see Genesis 2:7).  Men are a product of the dust of the ground and the Spirit.  They have been so since the beginning.  If ever there were a verse endorsing the theological idea of the Federal Headship of Adam, this might be the one, for it appears that the Psalmist sees human beings collectively expressed in the first Man, the dirt-man.  I doubt the Psalmist is a Calvinist, and he probably would be shocked at the further elaboration of Federal Headship, but it wouldn’t surprise me at all to discover that he thinks of God’s understanding of humanity as wrapped up in the first human being.

This reading is supported by consideration of the other words in this verse.  First, there’s ʿōṣem, translated as “frame” but really “might” or “strength.” It’s not the body that the Psalmist has in mind.  It’s the agency that human beings represent.  We might translate this as, “My actions were not held back from You.”  Oh, yes, that’s the verb kāḥad, translated as “hidden,” but really about keeping something back or refusing to make something known. If the poem is about chthonic mysteries, returning us to that supernatural event before Adam was placed in the Garden, perhaps the poet is reminding us that even though our earliest ancestor attempted to hold something back from YHVH, it was already known. That is supported by the implications of kāḥad, “In distinction from the other Hebrew words rendered ‘hide’ or ‘conceal’ (ḥābāʾ, ṭāman, sātar, and ʿālam, which see), kāḥad has to do with refusing to declare something.”[1]  Doesn’t this describe Adam’s response to YHVH’s confrontation in Genesis 3? Primordial and mythological, once more.

You will recall that we discovered the Psalmist used qānâ (in verse 13) rather than the usual words for human creation, that is, ʿāśâ or yāṣar.  When he described his personal development (“in my mother’s womb”), he avoided theses usual verbs, employing instead a verb that reminded us of the words of the woman in Genesis 4:1.  But now, when he writes about the ultimate mystery of human being, he goes back to the verb of Genesis 2, ʿāśâ.  There are, however, other considerations connected to this verb.

The verb ʿāśâ has the basic connotation of “do” or “make.” It is used in numerous crystallized expressions, always with the same basic idea.

Aside from the numerous occurrences of the meaning “do” or “make” in a general sense, ʿāsâis often used with the sense of ethical obligation. [2]

 What is formed in the secret parts is not simply the first body.  It is also the first commandment, the first obligation—and subsequently, the first thing to hide.  If the Psalmist deliberately switches from qānâ to ʿāśâ, he must want the reader to connect the dots.  This verse isn’t about contemporary human conception or development.  It’s about God’s formation of the original, and the mystery of why He made any of us.

“Skillfully wrought” is NASB’s way of interpreting rûqqam’ti.  The word is actually about weaving variegated cloth.  The idea implies embroidering colored thread into a piece of cloth.  We are well aware of the metaphor, but it’s worth remembering that God’s hand is often woven into the fabric of human beings in ways that are not obvious to the actor or actress.  If the poet wants us to recall this metaphor, we could easily associate the word with the lives of all the Genesis’ personalities.

Finally, we return to our opening inquiry.  What about “in the depths of the earth”?  Perhaps there is more than chthonic allusions.  Perhaps one of the constitutive elements of every human being is his or her ancestry.  Perhaps we are now connected to the other meaning of taḥtî, translated “depths.”  “ . . .in most of the cases of the usage with ʾereṣ (six times in Ezk, twice elsewhere) the reference is to the place of those who have died.”[3]  Human life arises from the mystery of the dust and Spirit and from the grave, the abode of everyone who came before us and the destiny of all who live today.  In those depths, life seems to be nothing more than a mystery that only God knows.

Topical Index: taḥtî, depths,qānâ, ʿāśâ, to form, ʿōṣem, frame, might, kāḥad, conceal, Psalm 139:15

[1]Oswalt, J. N. (1999). 972 כָחַד. In R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer, Jr. & B. K. Waltke (Eds.), Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament(R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer, Jr. & B. K. Waltke, Ed.) (electronic ed.) (436). Chicago: Moody Press.

[2]Mccomiskey, T. E. (1999). 1708 עָשָׂה. In R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer, Jr. & B. K. Waltke (Eds.), Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament(R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer, Jr. & B. K. Waltke, Ed.) (electronic ed.) (701). Chicago: Moody Press.

[3]Youngblood, R. F. (1999). 2504 תַּחַת. In R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer, Jr. & B. K. Waltke (Eds.), Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament(R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer, Jr. & B. K. Waltke, Ed.) (electronic ed.) (968). Chicago: Moody Press.

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mark Parry

My, my, my, delving ever deeper yet. We all where in the first Adam, just as we all who belive have our true life, our real life, in the second Adam and first real human being – Yeshua Messiah; our salvation from and guide out of the mud , muck and mire.

Brett Weiner B.B.( brother Brett)

Thanks skip for your references at the bottom. This reminds me that God is outside of our little box. God created something out of nothing. Faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of Things Not Seen. Put this together and we must put on the mind of Christ to even walk the righteous life. When we read about waiting on the Lord. This gives it A New Perspective. I’m sharing this one.. If that’s all right. The moon was great last night, yet should I be correct it and say this morning. All the myths that go with it. Just lead me to believe that God is misunderstood. It’s all about the revelation of his son. Even in this post God goes before us. We could bring that into a conclusion also. Shut up.

Laurita Hayes

This reminds me of “dust to dust”: we never get away from the humus component of embodied humanity: as dust goes; so go we. This rich weaving today (wow!) turned on a lot of light bulbs for me. Thank you!

I am also reminded of the allusions between the first Adam and the second (both singular). That allusion is also about source. Now we who enjoy life do so through the second Adam; not the first, who failed to pass life on through his humus (organic) body to us.

But finally, I think about the fact that we, in Eph. 4:13, are called to become the perfect MAN (again, singular): ” until all of us are united in the faith and in the full knowledge of God’s Son, … Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ”. I don’t think it is possible to be “perfect” in the singular, for perfection is about full, unencumbered, shared life BETWEEN. “Perfection”, in this verse, is about the collective, SINGULAR, (“richly woven”?) Body of Christ. We are perfect when we have figured out how to share life with each other.

The perfect singular, functionally speaking, then, is apparently only to be found in the perfect collective (sorry, ascetic holier-than-thou hermits). The amazing idea that God had – which was to invent matter as a substrate for “preparing” (through the exercise of collective free choice) a Body (temple) for Himself to “dwell in” – was apparently deliberate from the start. The command to “fill” (creative language) the earth with descendants who would perfectly love as a single unit was apparently not an afterthought of the cross for we find the thought fully developed from the beginning.

Laurita Hayes

Um, I meant to say “we AREN’T perfect UNTIL we have figured out how to share life with each other”.

Rich Pease

The mysteries of God are there to keep us
fascinated and intrigued with the how’s and
why’s of His creative purposes, as well as His
power, virtue and character.
As much as I know, I am just as comfortable
with what I don’t. It’s His business . . . and I
faithfully love and support Him as one of His own.

Theresa T

Before I read this today, I was grieved about how we as humans are harming the earth and the creatures God loves. We were supposed to care for His creation and each other but instead we polluted it with the precious blood of our murdered brother. That blood becomes part of the mystery of the dust and the Spirit and the grave. Skip, you have brilliantly revealed how the secret things belong to the LORD. Today I feel as far from the knowledge of God as the heavens are from the earth. I know, though, that life has meaning as I focus on the things revealed. You help reveal the incredible truth of Scripture. My prayer is that we would be inspired, rebuked, taught and trained in righteousness so we can function as we were created to function as one with YHVH, each other and our world. Messiah is worthy of our allegiance. That is life.

Irene

Never before have I felt connected to Adam, it was cool to feel apart of the bigger picture. Not so afraid to return to the dust either.

Amanda Youngblood

I think what blows my mind is how intelligent and deeply thoughtful David (and other Torah writers) was. I think sometimes we only look at the way he acted in other situations and assume he was more instinctive and primal, but when I read about the connections and subtleties of what he wrote, it’s incredibly complex. It makes what we write today feel like a pale comparison. Our language is nowhere near as subtle, and in a way that’s kind of sad, because I wonder if we miss so many things because we don’t really think about how something could have so many connections or meanings or purposes. Thanks you, Skip for bringing these beautiful threads to life and connecting these dots! 🙂